Construction Site Accident Attorney in Wamac

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate event of a construction site accident in Wamac, your top priority should be choosing an experienced and reliable attorney. Look no further than Carlson Bier, a specialized personal injury lawyer firm offering exceptional representation throughout Illinois. Our team has handled countless cases involving complex litigation for Construction Site Accidents to ensure clients receive what is rightfully theirs. With our years of experience and exceptional legal prowess combined with comprehensive knowledge about Workplace Safety Act and Occupational Health Acts, we are uniquely equipped to safeguard your rights diligently. Choose Carlson Bier because we believe that you deserve nothing but the optimal level of compensation after such distressing incidents. Our vigorous advocacy paired with personalized client attention sets us apart as a beacon of trust in these trying circumstances. Being victimized on any construction site shouldn’t preclude you from attaining justice – lean on Carlson Bier experts not just as attorneys but also as steadfast allies throughout this process.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Wamac Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that Construction Site Accidents can have devastating impacts on workers and those neighbouring the site. As a team of respected Personal Injury Attorneys based in Illinois, we are conscious of your legal rights and dedicated to ensuring the best possible outcomes for our clients involved in such accidents.

Construction Sites are bustling with activities; countless workers, heavy machinery, volatile materials – all these can pose threats if not managed properly. An accident may result from neglected safety measures or simple oversights, causing innocent people to suffer grave injuries or loss. These occurrences raise multiple questions about liability and compensation that only an informed attorney from Carlson Bier can adequately address.

Some key factors that generally contribute towards construction site accidents include:

– Poorly maintained equipment

– Lack of training

– Negligence of safety protocol

– Structural failures

Our expertise spans across numerous aspects related to Construction Site Accidents, from determining culpability to calculating fair compensation figures rooted in comprehensive investigations and expert knowledge.

As victim’s rights lawyers specializing in personal injury cases, it’s crucial for us at Carlson Bier to educate our clients about their situation. Amidst initial shocks and potential hospital visits post an accident, victims might feel overwhelmed with legality jargon while dealing with insurance companies or guilty parties. That is why we strive to simplify these matters through easy-to-understand legal advice catered specifically for your case.

In Illinois law, construction workers injured on-site possess the right to pursue claims against third-parties responsible for their injuries. Different scenarios may add more players into the mix – sub-contractors who did not uphold their duties, property owners who overlooked glaring hazards etc., thereby making each case unique with its specifics — which requires tailored strategies supported by robust advocacy skills along with fundamental understanding of various laws applicable in different directives.

Usually involving complex areas like Workers Compensation Law and Product Liability Laws depending upon individual circumstances,a successful claim hinges on meticulous groundwork and steadfast representation. The severity of your injuries, the extent of negligence from the counterparts, amount required for medical expenses, loss of earnings or even wrongful death – are all taken into account while building your case. We pride ourselves over our history of securing substantial settlements in favor of our clients facing such unfortunate circumstances.

Your trust in Carlson Bier signifies entrusting passionate experts who consider client welfare paramount. Our commitment towards holding guilty parties accountable underlines our mission to see justice served on behalf of victims deserving rightful compensation. For any queries regarding Construction Site Accidents cases you might have, we stand ready to listen and provide guidance suitable for your situation.

We believe that information is empowering. Hence,knowledge about potential rights and options at disposal assures victims an equitable chance during confronting situations.We ensure keeping clients updated through each step relieving unnecessary stress clamped from legal complications.Our past victories illustrate our dedicated pursuit until last moment seeking maximized compensations offering victims recoveries they rightly deserve

To conclude, if you’ve fallen victim to a Construction Site Accident in Illinois— don’t navigate this complex scenario alone. Allow us the opportunity to represent you ensuring fair procedures.You might still be wondering how much is your claim potentially worth? A team member at Carlson Bier law firm can aid you estimate implications after comprehensively reviewing your specific instance.To find out more ,we encourage reader’s click on button below this text revealing monetary value related with their case.Remember,you’re not just hiring a Personal Injury lawyer —you’re engaging a staunch advocate committed towards winning the fight for justice! Remember Justice prevails when truth triumphs!

Remember – choosing Carlson Bier means making an empowered decision all while warranting justice.

Please hit on “Next” Button below allowing us explore possibilities together rendering transparency throughout aiming for best possible outcome

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wamac Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Wamac

Areas of Practice in Wamac

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering skilled legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing professional legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Stumble Occurrences

Professional in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Injuries

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for harms and damages.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending specialist legal representation for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for harms.

Building Collisions

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Damage

Committed to advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer