...

Personal Injury Attorney in Wapella

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to personal injury cases in Wapella, Carlson Bier tops the list as an exceptional advocate. Skillful, responsive and committed; this law firm ensures each client receives utmost attention. Their team of personal injury attorneys has a splendid reputation for legal proficiency composed from years of experience serving Illinois residents. Whether you’ve been injured in a car accident or suffered harm due to medical malpractice; Carlson Bier is synonymous with justice well-achieved.

With an impressive record of securing favorable settlements and verdicts, they prioritize your recovery while navigating the complexities of these claims on your behalf. Every case is fought with diligence and dedication that stems from their unwavering commitment towards delivering positive outcomes.

What’s more? Carlson Bier cherishes transparency imbued with compassionate legal advice which lightens the burden off victims’ shoulders during such demanding times. Engaging them means assigning knowledgeable advocates who firmly believe in taking prompt action while ensuring client satisfaction throughout their representation journey – solidifying Carlson Bier’s standout position within Illinois’s Personal Injury law arena even beyond its base borders.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Wapella Illinois

Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, is committed to guiding you through the complex legal landscape of personal injury claims with confidence and clarity. When unfortunate instances lead to physical or emotional harm, our skilled team of attorneys steps in to champion your cause for justice and compensation. Let us illuminate some indispensable information regarding personal injury.

Personal injury cases are typically characterized by damage inflicted because of another party’s negligence, intentional wrongdoing or strict liability – a concept where someone may be held responsible irrespective of negligence or intent. The compass points of these cases can range from car accidents to workplace injuries, slip-and-falls accidents at public places, defective products causing harm, dog bite injuries and medical malpractice — each arena demanding its unique approach to proving fault and assessing damage.

To lay claim in a personal injury case effectively requires proving four key factors; Duty, Breach, Causation & Damages:

• Duty refers to the responsibility one individual has towards others’ safety.

• A breach happens when this responsibility is overlooked leading to potential harm.

• Causation bridges the breach with the occurrence of an actual adverse event.

• Lastly and perhaps most importantly, damages quantify the aftermath into financial terms encompassing lost wages, medical costs and pain/suffering inflicted.

At Carlson Bier we bolster these pillars for your case with seasoned insights on liability laws specific to Illinois’. Also understanding that time is crucial after an accident occurs–not only physically but legally as well—the statute of limitations (the time frame within which you must file a suit) for personal Injury Cases in Illinois stands at two years from the date of incident or discovery.

On occasion if you assume partial blame for your injuries it may inadvertently decrease potential compensations however at Carlton Bier rest assured knowing that per the Comparative Negligence Rule implemented across Illinois: even being partially liable doesn’t debar you from claiming damages– though they might be reduced proportionate to your fault.

While traversing these details our experts never overlook the toll such incidents can have on your emotional and physical health. To alleviate your stress, we adopt a contingency fee policy—a ‘No Win, No Fee’ commitment that ensures you only pay if the case is won, turning our victories monetary and moral into yours too.

Success in personal injury cases hinges heavily on adequate representation with the right blend of empathy and expertise. At Carlson Bier, we understand this balance as highly essential for providing legal counsel par excellence. With us you’re not just availing seasoned lawyers but also relatable individuals ready to stride alongside you in pursuit of justice and rightful compensations.

Your case might be elaborate or straightforward; multi-faceted or narrowly-defined – irrespective, it’s vital to leaving no stone unturned when determining where to place the gavel of responsibility for damages sustained. As leading personal injury lawyers based in Illinois—equally knowledgeable about statewide laws as well as local practices—we are ideally poised to bring clarity amidst complexity.

Are you curious about what value Carlson Bier can add effectively towards achieving successful outcomes from your unique circumstances? Rightfully so! The detailed analysis required in personal injury suits often pivots them from being mere trials to becoming inquiries revealing significant findings—the returns on which however are commensurate with appropriate guidance sought promptly. This makes engaging expert legal professionals early pivotal for chances of optimal results.

In carrying forth our torch—as trusted advisors possessing nuanced knowledge combined seamlessly with genuine dedication—you are choosing a law firm completing hundreds of triumphant professional journeys while shaping many more personal ones simultaneously.

We encourage you to explore further how employing this resolve may assist your unique situation better by clicking the button below—it leads not just towards an approximation of what “worth” your case holds but progressively forward bolstered by allies who truly comprehend its worthiness within both courtrooms and everyday lives alike…remember at Carlson Bier, we don’t just advocate for you–we amplify you!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Wapella Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Wapella

Areas of Practice in Wapella

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Extending skilled legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending professional legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Fall Mishaps

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal aid for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for hurts and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Extending adept legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on providing expert legal support for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Focused on representing persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer