FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Wapella

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re grappling with a product liability case in Wapella, Illinois, it’s vital to engage a robustly competent and accomplished law team. Look no further than Carlson Bier for your legal representation. As trusted personal injury attorneys who carry an impressive history of reverberating success stories, we exert every effort into ensuring our clients are fully compensated for injuries from defective products. Our team at Carlson Bier has unswerving dedication to understanding the case details and intricacies unique to product liability claims. Moreover, we harness deep industry knowledge and significant courtroom experience against major manufacturers whose negligence result in injurious consequences. We are steadfastly committed to equality under the law! For those dealing with the aftermath of preventable harm owing due to faulty goods; trust us—your reliable Products Liability attorney group—to champion your rights while deflecting undue pressures that can come along heavy-handed firms focusing on big businesses instead of individual lives affected by defective products. Choose confidence in expertise — choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Wapella Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our consistent endeavor on behalf of our clients revolves around the pursuit of justice for personal injuries connected to product liability. A law firm that has cultivated a distinguished reputation within Illinois’ legal canvas, we are dedicated to representing individuals who have been victims of various forms of negligence arising from faulty products. Our team provides expertise built upon years of successful representation and deep familiarity with the intricate aspects of product liability law.

Product Liability is an area in legal jurisprudence wherein manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, or retailers can be held accountable if their products prove to be defective causing harm or injury. This might pertain to any damages inflicted due to design flaws, manufacturing defects, or improper instructions related to usage. At Carlson Bier, it’s our primary obligation to ensure that you are fully capable of understanding this comprehensive field.

• Design Defects: These are innate flaws stemming from the designing stage itself. Even where manufacture and assembly are perfect, such defects can lead a product being inherently hazardous.

• Manufacturing Defects: Sometimes even well-designed products turn out harmful during their manufacture or assembly phase which can result in unexpected accidents.

• Marketing Defects: These defects occur due when consumers aren’t provided with appropriate instructions about use or adequate warnings concerning potential risks involved.

Allow us at Carlson Bier guide you while navigation through these complexities. We believe in delivering justice through compassionate representation and relentless litigation while fostering empowerment through education.

Moreover, as your diligent advocates in prosecuting cases pertinent to Product Liability claims, we highlight certain prerequisites essential for strengthening your case:

1) Injury/harm must have occurred

2) The said product was defective

3) The defect was a directly resultant factor causing injury

4) The product had been used as intended

In claiming reparation under Product Liability Law’, it becomes equally significant to note that certain stipulations exist within Illinois boundaries: Statute-of-limitation – lawsuit filing must take place within two years of the injury. Additionally, for product liability claims, the product must not have been purchased more than 12 years ago or possessed by the plaintiff for a period exceeding ten years.

Furthermore, Illinois advocates ‘modified comparative negligence’. This infers that if a person is found to be partially at fault, a percentage reduction from the compensation would follow subject to the degree of their accountability.

The professionals at Carlson Bier arm you with critical guidance necessary while walking on this legal tightrope. We aim to foster an alliance wherein our role extends beyond representation; paving avenues for informed decision-making repercussions deserving justice and rightful compensation.

Keep in mind that every case differs regarding its individual characteristics and complexities entailed therein. The aforementioned elements broadly encapsulate primary constituents comprising Product Liability lawsuits. However, intricacies might vary across different legal landscapes and specific case outlines.

Carve your path towards much-deserved justice armed with information plucked straight out of fundamental legal frameworks while also leveraging professional prowess distilled through countless successful prosecutions at Carlson Bier.

As one final note, we would like to bring emphasis on complying thoroughly with state laws which mandate not claiming presence in any city minus a physical office there within the state of Illinois. It’s our endeavor ensures absolute compliance concerning this statute.

Consequently, every damaged victim deserves complete reparation – and nothing less! We want you bear witness our undying commitment as your trustworthy personal injury attorney crusading tirelessly against injustice impelled by defective products; taking cognizance right down to most intrinsic details aiding signature strategies maximized for victory!

No matter how intricate or straightforward your situation may appear initially, allow us at Carlson Bier extend our support guiding you efficaciously across all stages vital towards securing triumph!

Now is the time! Take control today before another moment flickers past denied justice especially when consequences touch upon something as monumental as personal well-being flanking peace of mind thereby finely affecting life’s quality. Hence, we at Carlson Bier are waiting to embark upon this challenging endeavor on your behalf.

Ready to ascertain the rightful worth of your case? Wonder how much compensation you truly deserve for bringing the liable party to book? Don’t let any further doubts hinder your progress towards claiming what is rightfully yours. Click the button below now and take control in seeking out justice subjected because of others’ negligence! Let our expertise be your guiding beacon as we strive relentlessly ensuring fair remuneration within Illinois product liability law’s periphery. Take a firm step forward; today certainly counts!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wapella Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Wapella

Areas of Practice in Wapella

Bicycle Collisions

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving skilled legal advice for people of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal guidance to victims affected by defective items.

Aged Malpractice

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Slip Occurrences

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Crash

Delivering specialist legal advice for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Building Collisions

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to extending specialized legal support for individuals suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and expert legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Focused on supporting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440