...

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in White Hall

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a motorcycle accident, Carlson Bier is the most appropriate choice for legal representation. Combining our informed understanding of Illinois state law with our profound experience in personal injury cases, we deftly handle each client’s case taking care to protect their rights and secure maximum compensation for losses incurred. In White Hall, accidents involving motorcycles often result in serious injuries; sadly some prove fatal. When catastrophe strikes, count on us for your legal defense. Our ability to navigate complex litigation matters sets Carlson Bier apart from other firms; calling upon experts when necessary to establish fault and negotiate diligently with insurance companies ensure optimal results are achieved promptly. The reputation of excellence that precedes Carlson Bier across Illinois stems from years of tenaciously pursuing justice on behalf of those who have been personally injured during a motorbike accident adding value beyond just winning lawsuits but also promoting safer roads for all riders within the beautiful Prairie State.

About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in White Hall Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier legal expert’s portal, a recognized law firm specializing in personal injury cases and an authority on Motorcycle Accident Laws in Illinois. For many bikers, exploring the open road on two wheels symbolizes freedom and thrill. However, they unfortunately also find themselves particularly exposed to grave injuries in case of accidents.

Expertise shows that motorcycle accidents often result in severe damages because riders lack the physical protection that normal automobile drivers enjoy. Such incidents can have ripple effects including incapacitating injuries or financial devastation arising from loss of work or medical bills. Therein lies our role as Carlson Bier – we strive relentlessly to help accident victims navigate these troubled waters by demystifying Illinois state laws and ensuring rightful compensation.

One unique feature about personal injury law in Illinois is that it follows the “modified comparative negligence” rule. This means you may still receive compensation even if you were partly at fault for your accident, provided your degree of fault is less than 50%. Notably:

• If you share no part of blame, expect full compensatory payment.

• Proportional deductions apply if your partial fault contributed towards the event.

We’re highlighting this aspect because such critical insights form just one fragment of our extensive dedication towards client education. We believe knowledge truly empowers; hence we continually invest time simplifying complex legal jargons into digestible information for you.

Another important factor to note – the statute of limitations varies greatly by case type in Illinois State Law. Time limits to file a lawsuit typically include:

– Two years’ limit for most personal injury claims

– Five years for property damage claims

This deadline countdown begins either when the accident occurs or when you discovered (or should’ve reasonably discovered) the sustained injury following said accident.

At Carlson Bier, we understand every single second counts post-accident. Immediate assessment contributes significantly toward strengthening your claim by ensuring all necessary evidence like medical records or eye-witness testimonies are meticulously gathered while still fresh. Delaying action could potentially dilute your case, resulting in less than the desired compensation.

We strongly advise not to shoulder these burdens alone. Your focus should be on healing and rehabilitation post-incident. Let our experienced team at Carlson Bier worry about legal technicalities, procedures involved or negotiation of a fair settlement. We prioritize simplifying this stressful period for you by reassuring expert guidance all through this journey.

Remember though – Motorcyclists also have roles toward ensuring their own safety on roads. These practices include:

• Always wearing helmets – it reduces brain injury risk significantly.

• Adherence to traffic laws – obeying speed limits, parking guidelines etc.

• Regular vehicle maintenance – it ensures optimal performance during rides.

At Carlson Bier we undertake an individual approach with each client’s case because we understand no two accidents are identical in nature; every outcome is equally unique accordingly. This is why many clients trust us as their personal injury attorneys after motorcycle accidents: our commitment stands unparallel towards investing time, effort and resources securing best outcomes for victims seeking rightful compensations.

Our ethos thrives on ‘equal justice under law’, hence always strive towards achieving same for accident victims regardless of size of claim. Do remember that contacting us doesn’t mean you’re under any obligation to pursue a lawsuit — neither does it cost anything!

Ready to learn more? Find out today how we could assist recovering right compensations fitting perfectly into your unique situation and experiences post-accident by clicking below . You will discover just how much your case may be worth without any further obligation! Remember – Knowledge is power; equip yourself well today with Carlson Bier Legal Experts Portal!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For White Hall Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in White Hall

Areas of Practice in White Hall

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Offering skilled legal help for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing experienced legal services for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to aiding patients of car accidents obtain appropriate remuneration for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring expert legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for hurts.

Building Incidents

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in ensuring dedicated legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer