FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in White Hall

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, our commitment to providing unparalleled legal service for Spinal Cord Injuries is unwavering. As a top-ranking personal injury attorney group in Illinois, we thoroughly understand the complex nature of spinal cord injuries, their life-altering impacts and the need for aggressive legal representation. Our firm has an impeccable record in successfully pursuing compensation claims related to these types of injuries against negligent parties. We assiduously advocate for our clients’ rights, with emphasis on securing comprehensive recompense for medical expenses, loss of income and all other ancillary damages they have suffered due to spinal cord injury negligence or malpractice. Moreover, Carlson Bier boasts an esteemed collective experience spanning years – granting us unique insights into personalized strategies yielding best possible outcomes in these cases. Despite certain geographical considerations concerning White Hall clientele; rest assured that steadfast dedication paired with proactive communication underpins everything we do at Carlson Bier as your most reliable consideration when seeking exceptional counsel regarding spinal cord injuries law matters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in White Hall Illinois

At the esteemed law firm of Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing exceptional legal services to victims of personal injury, with a particular emphasis on Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). We realize that suffering any form of physical trauma can not only bear monumental repercussions on one’s health but also significantly impact your quality of life. This impact is felt exceedingly more when dealing with spinal cord injuries due to their extensive implications.

Spinal Cord Injuries can occur as either complete or incomplete injuries. Complete SCIs result in total loss of all motor function and sensation below the level of injury i.e., if an injury occurs at or above the mid-back, it may affect the individual’s ability to use their legs(paraplegic). An injury occurring at or above the neck region will likely affect both arms and legs (quadriplegic). On the contrary, incomplete injuries encompass a wide range of conditions where there is some degree of sensation or movement below the site of injury.

Furthermore, such injuries could be attributed to numerous causes: traffic accidents account for nearly half while falls take up another substantial portion; moreover, violence and sports-related incidents contribute notably too. Nevertheless, irrespective of the cause or severity, seeking immediate medical attention post-injury enhances chances for recovery substantially.

Our profound understanding about these cases’ complexity drives us at Carlson Bier to offer comprehensive legal assistance for victims affected by such profound life-altering circumstances. Contrary to popular perception, building an SCI case involves more than dealing with insurance adjusters alone – from working alongside medical experts to validate claims effectively through developing a supportive network including vocational rehabilitation specialists and life-care planners; our experienced attorneys pledge relentless support during every step throughout this arduous journey towards securing justice rightfully due.

Of critical importance are following components when constructing an effective SCI claim:

– Determining Liability: Essential to pinpoint those accountable for your traumatic ordeal whether an individual/corporation/government entity.

– Assessing Damages: Calculating the actual costs you’ve incurred from medical care, projected future costs, lost wages, loss of earning capacity and incorporating intangible factors such as mental trauma or reduced quality of life.

– Negotiating Settlements: Here’s where our expertise truly shines—we negotiate aggressively to ensure that you are compensated fairly since most cases culminate at this stage.

– Trial Representation: If required, we’re ready for trial litigation leveraging solid legal strategies ensuring rights are upheld before a jury if necessary.

At Carlson Bier SIC-cognizant legal team doesn’t merely strive to win your case. Our ultimate objective is to restore dignity enabling victims to reclaim their lives whilst providing the robust support system needed throughout this endeavor—no stone remains unturned in securing maximum compensation rightfully due post these devastating incidents for all clients entrusting us with their faith.

Do recall though – every personal injury claim ensues within a predefined time framespace known as ‘statute limitations’; so prompt action is highly advised. Feel free to lean on our collective wisdom borne out of decades spent fighting passionately for rights of SCI victims; harnessing unwavering resolve throughout these reputed years enabling countless others reclaim their deserving justice amidst facing similar adversity.

In axiom, personal struggle should never stand in way of seeking express legal recourse nor let inadequate information hinder progress towards deserved reparation. Let professionals at Carlson Bier guide you through complex landscapes navigated here within Illinois Injury Law bringing closer towards fuller recovery. Uncertain about next steps? Click the button below and receive an instant assessment specifically tailored according personalized circumstances determining exactly how much your case worth – All strictly compliant under Illinois state law regulations safeguarding interests best!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For White Hall Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in White Hall

Areas of Practice in White Hall

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing specialist legal support for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Extending expert legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying skilled legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Fall Injuries

Expert in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing experienced legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Construction Accidents

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in offering dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Expert in defending patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​