FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wilmette

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate reality of dog bite injuries in Wilmette, you require more than compassion, you require dedicated and experienced legal representation. At Carlson Bier, we fully understand the trauma such events can cause both physically and emotionally. Our emphasis on strong advocacy paired with our deep knowledge of Illinois’s complex personal injury laws makes us an ideal choice for your representation. We are a firm that listens attentively to our clients’ concerns while crafting personalized strategies aimed at securing fair compensation for medical bills, psychological distress or loss of wages associated from such incidents. Compassion is only effective when it’s backed by action. Carlson Bier excels not only because of their extensive experience in handling dog bite cases but also their relentless commitment to pursuing just compensation for victims who have suffered due to others’ negligence regarding pet ownership. Trusting us means entrusting your case to a team whose resolve is as unwavering as yours when fighting against injustice related to dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wilmette Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, esteemed personal injury attorneys based in Illinois. We are dedicated to championing for the rights of injury victims, with a special focus on dog bite cases. Understanding dog bite injuries is crucial as they not only cause physical damage but can result in psychological trauma that lasts long after the wounds have healed. Our firm prides itself on providing insightful and valuable information about this area of personal injury law.

Dog bites can occur unexpectedly, impacting victims’ lives dramatically. Notably, severe medical issues such as nerve damage, scarring, infections and emotional trauma may arise from these incidents – all factors addressed meticulously by Illinois legislation. In fact, under the Illinois Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5/16), if a dog or other animal without provocation attacks an individual resulting in injuries, the owner is liable for damages. It’s important that you understand your rights when dealing with such incidents particularly because the burden of proof rests upon you—as the victim—to establish that there was no provocation before the attack.

• Key point: No fault needs to be proven against the dog owner; therefore the case hinges on proving lack of provocation rather than owner negligence.

• Key point: You also have five years from the date of your accident to file a lawsuit according to Illinois state law.

• Key point: The state employs strict liability laws where pet owners are responsible for injuries caused by their pets irrespective of whether they knew their pets were dangerous.

Here at Carlson Bier, we work diligently toward mitigating further harm while securing just compensation for victims related to medical expenses (both present and future), loss of income during recovery and additional costs linked with rehabilitation efforts like therapy sessions or plastic surgery required due to disfigurement.

Moreover, it’s essential to remember that addressing these challenging situations alone can inadvertently weaken your position legally. Having experienced legal representation ensures proper investigation into scenarios involving potential shared liability—where both parties may be at fault—or cases involving multiple dogs or owners. It also affirms strength in negotiations with insurance companies who often aim at minimizing compensation awards.

• Key point: Hiring a personal injury attorney greatly improves your chances of obtaining substantial compensation.

• Key point: Experienced lawyers can guide you through potential pitfalls and ensure that no crucial details are overlooked.

• Key point: An attorney can engage effectively with insurance companies on your behalf ensuring your rights are adequately defended.

As established legal professionals, the Carlson Bier team is positioned to provide you with valuable guidance and representation during this challenging time. We leverage our extensive knowledge of Illinois law combined with compassionate, individualized attention to help victims navigate this process as smoothly and as stress-free as possible. Ultimately, we endeavor to secure justice for our clients aiding them onto paths of physical, emotional and financial recovery.

Imagine having the peace of mind knowing that proven experts in the field got your interests covered while you focus solely on healing? Our commitment extends beyond words; it’s conveyed through action reflected in countless successful outcomes over years serving Illinois’ area clients just like you. Hence, if you were involved in a dog bite incident causing injury requiring medical attention or causing significant pain or suffering, consider allowing us to evaluate how much value rests within your case.

The possibility of gaining fair deserved compensation directly correlates with possessing proper knowledgeable legal assistance—a resource we proudly offer here at Carlson Bier—to assist those invested parties such as yourself. Are you ready to find out what entitlements could be due for those unexpected hospital bills, specific therapy sessions or lost wages? Click on the button below so we can analyze accurately just how much value holds within your case based upon facts presented. Take the first significant step toward reclaiming control over life post-injury by prioritizing knowledge because empowerment begins there!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wilmette Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wilmette

Areas of Practice in Wilmette

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing specialist legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying adept legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Stumble Incidents

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Committed to aiding patients of car accidents get just payout for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for losses.

Building Site Accidents

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Passing

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Harm

Focused on assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​