...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Wilsonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When experiencing the aftermath of a motorcycle accident in Wilsonville, reliable legal support is crucial. Carlson Bier firm offers expertise and dedicated service to victims caught up in such predicaments. Handling cases with meticulous attention to detail, they understand the nuances specific to motorcycle accidents while applying Illinois law effectively. Victims can depend on them for aggressive representation against insurance companies seeking to minimize compensation unfairly. Their comprehensive understanding allows them to assess intricacies often overlooked, ensuring nothing gets left off the negotiation table that could amount into significant value of rightful claims — examples include future medical costs, reduced earning capacity or alterations needed at your residence due to injuries suffered from an accident. Being able not only advocate but actively pursue justice and restitution makes Carlson Bier an exceptional choice for those facing the repercussions of a motorbike incident. Make no mistake; when dealing with such vital matters related directly affecting lives post-accident— choosing skilled litigators at Carlson Bier should be given serious consideration.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Wilsonville Illinois

Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm in Illinois, specializes in providing comprehensive legal services to victims of motorcycle accidents. Our profound experience and expertise extend widely within the complex boundaries that define this sensitive field. We understand how traumatizing a motorcycle accident can be – physically, emotionally, and financially. Therefore, we commit ourselves to dutifully fight for our clients’ rights and ensure they achieve the justice they deserve.

Motorcycle riders bear an increased risk of experiencing severe injuries given their exposure to direct impact during accidents. Common injuries sustained from such incidents include road rash, bone fractures or breaks, head or brain injuries, and spinal cord injuries. However, please remember these conditions not only lend to monumental medical bills but also lead to loss of wages due to recuperation time away from work.

• Physical damages

• Medical expenses

• Loss of earnings

• Emotional distress

The above points encompass some key factors considered while assessing your compensation claim post a Motorcycle Accident in Illinois.

Understanding the intricacies around the legality and proceedings following a motorcycle accident is critical.

– Determining Fault: Establishing who was liable during the incident plays a pivotal role as it directly affects any potential compensation claims.

– Understanding Injury Claims: Injury claims often comprise multiple components such as pain & suffering owing to physical injury alongside other elements like lost wages caused by inability to work through recovery durations.

– Insurance Issues: Dealing with insurance companies can be overwhelming considering their reluctancy during times of disputations regarding coverage circumferences.

At Carlson Bier, we cater diligently to all these concerns facing our clients with utmost vigor. We advocate assertively on behalf of our valued clientele against insurance firms and help them decipher convoluted coverages while ensuring appropriate compensation reaches their hands timely.

Our approach rests heavily on trust-based relationships nurtured strictly under confidentiality agreements safeguarding your information profusely. Buttressed by years spent mastering personal injury laws specific to Illinois, we skillfully tailor appropriate legal strategies delivering profound results. Always keeping our clients’ best interests at heart, we ensure the journey towards achieving just compensation does not deepen your emotional wounds further but begins paving a peaceful passage for healing.

The intricacies involved in motorcycle accident cases extend well beyond simply understanding who is legally at fault. It includes dealing with insurance carriers refusing fair settlements and fighting diligently on your behalf against parties responsible for the incident irresponsibly. Hence entrusting this herculean task upon Carlson Bier’s seasoned shoulder feels less daunting; primarily given our long history of significant success stories earning compensations rightfully belonging to victims suffering from dire circumstances undeservedly.

Trust us when we say there isn’t any question too insignificant or trivial in such distressing times! Our team excels at taking time ensuring all client queries get addressed comprehensively leaving no room for doubts behind. We advocate under two setups – Contingency Fee Arrangements (no upfront costs, fees cut post win) & Hourly Rates, tailored as per individual requirements serving maximum convenience coupled with quality service.

Fetching justice never flagged absent due to financial constraints stands amongst pivotal ethos pillars of Carlson Bier’s foundationally strong structure built on high integrity moral grounds.

Click on the button below right now if you wish sailing through these turbulent times easing anxieties hanging ominously over your heart. Allow us an opportunity identifying how much worth behold your case! Trust Carlson Bier to deliver justice punctually and efficiently while you focus primarily on recovery enduring a challenging chapter patiently yet courageously within life’s uncertainty-filled narration.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Wilsonville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Wilsonville

Areas of Practice in Wilsonville

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Burns

Giving specialist legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Extending dedicated legal advice for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing adept legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Trip Mishaps

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable recompense for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Ensuring expert legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Construction Collisions

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Damages

Specializing in providing dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and skilled legal representation to ensure compensation.

Backbone Injury

Dedicated to defending victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​