...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Zeigler

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating through the repercussions of a canine-related incident can be challenging. Carlson Bier, providers of accomplished Dog Bite Injuries attorney services, understand what you’re going through and are committed to help. When it comes to representing clients who’ve experienced such traumas in Zeigler, our expertise is unparalleled. Our skilled attorneys have vast experience interpreting complex Illinois laws relating to animal attacks and applying them effectively for utmost client benefit. At Carlson Bier, we focus on safeguarding your rights while striving for maximal compensation so you can concentrate solely on healing physically and emotionally from these distressing experiences. Decades-long dedication has honed us into masters at dealing with hurdles that may arise during settlement or trial proceedings related to dog bite injuries lawsuits; all aimed at securing justice efficiently and swiftly for you! Thus when considering legal counsel pertaining to dog bite incidents in Zeigler, remember one name – Carlson Bier – as your trusted companion on this path towards unprecedented legal resolution assistance.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Zeigler Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases, offering expert legal advice and representation to residents of Illinois who have encountered unfortunate events such as dog bite injuries. We understand the trauma and pain that these incidents can cause, not only physically but also emotionally; hence we work diligently to ensure justice is served for victims of canine aggression.

Dog bites can be a traumatic event leading to serious injury. Many victims may not understand their rights or what action they ought to undertake after an incident. Various studies even show that the majority of dog bite injuries occur at residences and are caused by dogs owned by family members or friends. To navigate through this complex process efficiently you need the guidance of knowledgeable lawyers like us at Carlson Bier.

Victims should realize that injuries from dog bites aren’t confined to physical harm alone; they often include psychological distress too. Some people who experience dog bites might suffer post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), requiring extensive therapy sessions causing them more suffering.

Let’s enumerate some pertinent pointers regarding Dog Bite Injuries:

• Illinois’ Animal Control Act holds pet owners strictly liable for any unprovoked attacks perpetrated by their pets.

• Be it minor or severe, medical attention is necessary following a dog bite incident.

• It is crucial to identify the animal accurately so its vaccination records can be checked.

• Reporting the incidence promptly allows local animal control agencies to investigate properly keeping everyone safe potentially.

• Damages recoverable include hospital bills, future medical care, wage loss due to absentia from work during recovery time, emotional anguish, etc.

Legal processes surrounding these incidents can sometimes be confusing because every case stands unique in terms of circumstances leading up to the accident, severity of sustained injury & damage assessment from varying angles – economic and non-economic both. Let our practiced attorneys help untangle this complicated conundrum while advocating fiercely on your behalf against those accountable.

Working with skilled personal injury attorneys such as ourselves will allow you to focus on your recovery. At Carlson Bier, we commit ourselves thoroughly into every case we undertake and our primary objective is securing the maximum compensation possible for our clients. We understand how crucial this damage relief can be towards successful rehabilitation of a victim post such distressful events.

Remember not only does the physical pain from dog bite injuries need time to heal, it also significantly impacts your daily life, potentially creating financial pressure due to medical expenses or lost wages during recuperation. Carlson Bier’s competent legal team stays with you all through these trying times offering full assistance.

Finally, at Carlson Bier we believe it’s essential for you as a potential client to know what value sits on your case. True knowledge grants power by putting control back in your hands whereby informed decisions may be made free from influence or fear. Thus offer us an opportunity to provide detailed information about where your situation stands legally speaking when after suffering Dog Bite Injuries accidents via the button below. Find out in moments what entitlements could be rightfully yours by unveiling potentials vesting within your unique personal injury incident circumstances right away.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Zeigler Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Zeigler

Areas of Practice in Zeigler

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering expert legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Mishaps

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Newborn Wounds

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Accidents: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Crash

Providing experienced legal support for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on offering specialized legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Backbone Impairment

Dedicated to representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer