...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Grafton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you have been subjected to a dog bite injury, it calls for swift legal advice and assistance. Here at Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing such cases efficiently and tirelessly. As a prominent figure in the Illinois legal scene, our skilled team is deeply committed to providing the highest quality of service for dog bite injuries. We offer clear communication on every step of your claim process while meticulously preparing each case with rigorous attention to detail. Our expertise allows us not only to steadily negotiate favorable settlements but also confidently stand against insurance companies seeking unfair resolutions for victims like yourself. The core aim rests on ensuring justice through rightful compensation whilst easing any physical or emotional trauma endured during your ordeal.Carlson Bier proudly stands as an advocate within Illinois’ borders helping you navigate these troubling waters smoothly.As astute advisors who understand local laws intricately especially in cases related to Grafton incidents.We are not merely looking out for your immediate needs; we endeavor towards securing peace of mind after a traumatic event.Those affected by dog bites rightfully deserve nothing less than excellence – exactly what Carlson Bier delivers!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Grafton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are seasoned Illinois personal injury attorneys who appreciate the physical and emotional trauma of dog bite injuries. We are highly skilled in representing victims inflicted by such unfortunate incidents and dedicate ourselves to helping them navigate through the complex legal process.

A significant number of Americans each year face distressing dog bite incidents that lead to severe injuries and traumas. The state of Illinois recognizes this issue and has enacted legislation holding pet owners accountable for their pets’ untoward actions. Crucially, in Illinois, the victim does not need to prove that a dog owner was at fault if an unprovoked attack occurs on public property or while lawfully on private property.

Dog bites can result in far more than just physical pain; they often leave psychological scars as well, impacting victims’ daily lives long after physical wounds have healed. Common consequences include:

• Physical Injuries – Ranging from deep punctures and lacerations to fractured bones.

• Emotional Trauma – This may include anxiety, fear of dogs (Cynophobia), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, sleep disorders, behavioral changes especially in children.

• Medical Expenses – These might include emergency room visits, surgeries, counseling services or rehabilitation costs.

• Loss of Income – When severe enough you might require time off work leading to potential income loss.

Victims should understand that compensation covering these damages could be available under the Illinois Animal Control Act which holds violators liable for veterinary medical expenses along with other quantifiable damages sustained by a person bitten by their dog-unprovoked-as well as any civil damages that may be proven.

At Carlson Bier, we not only fight for your rights but also educate you throughout the process so that you fully comprehend every aspect related to your case—ranging from the specifics of Personal Injury Law concerning canine bites in Illinois down towards what compensation claims might potentially entail given your particular situation. With our extensive experience dealing with such cases, we have formulated viable legal strategies that work best toward seeking reparations relevant to your unique needs and circumstances.

Whether the incident occurred in public premises or someone else’s private property—our skilled attorneys aim to seek justice by fighting for appropriate compensation rightfully owed to you according to Illinois law. This includes taking all necessary steps such as evaluating the extent of your injury, negotiating with pet owners or insurance companies, filing required documentation within the appropriate timeframe and if necessary, fiercely advocating on your behalf in court. Our in-depth understanding of dog bite injuries matched with unbeatable dedication makes Carlson Bier a strong ally for victims seeking just recompense.

We offer our expertise during this critical time when quick decision-making is essential but difficult due to trauma caused by painful incidents like dog bites. Being trusted personal investigators across Illinois—with no specific ties to Grafton—we’re committed to bringing about much-needed respite through lawful means.

As experts specializing in personal injury claims related specifically towards dog bite incidents—we cannot stress enough how important it is for affected parties not to delay reaching out. Each claim has specified statutory periods beyond which action might not be valid and potential entitlements could be at risk of forfeiture.

Our transparent online platform offers you an immediate estimate on what your case might be worth—giving victims that reach out to us an initial idea of potential outcomes right from the comfort of their home or hospital bed itself. The road to justice should never feel like a lonely journey, let Carlson Bier assist in avenging your rightful damages today! Click the button below now and figure exactly how much justice awaits at the end of this unfortunate incident—with Carlson Bier standing firmly by your side throughout this process.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grafton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Grafton

Areas of Practice in Grafton

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering specialist legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering professional legal advice for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending specialist legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Slip Mishaps

Professional in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Collisions: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents gain fair payout for damages and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Collision

Offering expert legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to extending professional legal support for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Expert in advocating for clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​