...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bradford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or your loved ones fall victim to a dog bite injury, it’s imperative to seek representation by an experienced attorney. Carlson Bier claims our position as the leading choice for this type of personal injury case in Illinois. With a deep understanding of the complexities involving dog bite law, our firm offers dedicated counsel and comprehensive legal strategies honed by years of practical experience. Our compassionate approach towards clients coupled with aggressive advocacy aims to secure maximum compensation for medical costs, pain and suffering, lost work income among others related damages. Working with us means harnessing proficiency in navigating stringent legal frameworks surrounding canine attack incidents; thus saving you from stress encountered through litigation while optimizing chances of fair redressal recovery. Furthermore, being well-versed about the specific intricacies within Bradford’s local judicial systems significantly strengthens your case when against adverse parties including insurance companies that may undervalue your claim. Choose Carlson Bier for superior representation today – passion-fueled expertise at its finest.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bradford Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that an encounter with a canine can, at times, transform into an unforeseen tragedy. Dog bite injuries are more common than you might think and they hold the potential for serious harm or far-reaching consequences. Distinctively based in Illinois, our experienced personal injury attorneys comprehend this reality and are deeply invested in guiding victims through their legal journeys.

Dog bites can result in severe physical trauma such as puncture wounds, lacerations, nerve damage, scarring or even infectious diseases like Rabies and Tetanus. Nevertheless, the impact isn’t limited to just physical damage but extends to psychological traumas too such as fear and anxiety disorders. It is crucial to know that the consequent medical costs for treatments shouldn’t add blows to your grievances.

To help demystify dog bite laws in Illinois here are few key points one should be aware of:

• The state employs a ‘strict liability’ dog-bite law stating that the dog’s owner is liable if their dog causes injury to another individual without being provoked.

• There’s no ‘one free bite rule’ either which means even if it was for the first time that the dog exhibited dangerous behavior its owner could still potentially be held accountable.

• A victim may not however claim compensation if he was trespassing or provoking the dog at the time of injury.

Being cognizant of these aspects empowers you to grasp your rights after suffering from a dog bite injury better. Moreover; countering such incidents requires proficient legal guidance on health regulations, animal control laws and insurances relative to Illinois jurisdiction.

Apart from providing detail-oriented counsel right from accusation filing up until resolutions, our focus lies equally on compassionately acknowledging what each affected party had endured because of someone else’s negligence. Carlson Bier maintains resilience when representing cases involving children who are often most susceptible to these attacks due to their size and inability yet to fathom danger completely.

We commit ourselves to apprise you on how the claim process flows – aimed at compensating you for your pain, suffering, medical bills and loss of earnings; all while ensuring that repercussions follow to avoid recurrence of such unfortunate incidents. Your peace of mind and a safe environment align more than anything with our mission.

The aftermath attributed by a dog bite injury vastly differ from one case to another. For this very reason the worth of each claim must be calculated meticulously taking into account specifics of an incident. From contemplating liability confines up until corresponding falls in prospects future net earnings every minute detail needs consideration for fair remuneration.

Carlson Bier ardently believe that no victim should suffer silent hardships due to another’s negligence; which is why we have made obtaining legal help after dog bite injuries as seamless possible – free initial consultations followed by contingency based payment on recovery sums after winning lawsuits unlike charging hourly or flat fees upfront.

Through years serving Illinois, the team here has procured substantial settlements for clients who were victims of dog bite injuries. We are committed not just in assisting them embark onto their life post-trauma journey but also vigilantly educating communities about preventive measures and risk factor assessments reducing potential threats around respectable neighborhoods.

Injuries from dreadful circumstances like these present both physical agony and emotional distress to victims. At Carlson Bier, we understand this turmoil and pledge to tirelessly work, navigate complex laws and ensure maximum compensation owed makes way back home where it truly belongs.

Whether you are familiar with how compensations work or feel daunted by its regulations; if stuck at whether your situation merits legal action; remember knowledge empowers people hence understanding where you stand within law during adversity becomes paramount.

Ready to find out how much your case could be worth? Should you decide navigating these waters alone isn’t feasible anymore do click the button below without any qualms – because at Carlson Bier convenience meets justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Bradford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bradford

Areas of Practice in Bradford

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving specialist legal advice for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal services for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal services to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Trip Accidents

Professional in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Collisions: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents secure fair settlement for harms and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Crash

Providing specialist legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for harms.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in ensuring specialized legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to supporting individuals with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​