...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Saint David

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Trust Carlson Bier for your Dog Bite Injuries legal representation. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our team has specialized expertise in handling complex dog bite cases with diligence and efficiency. We offer tailored legal strategies to assert the rights of Saint David residents who have suffered from distressing dog bite injuries. Our comprehensive understanding of Illinois law empowers us to fight diligently for full compensation on your behalf and we never back down when advocating for our clients’ interests. At Carlson Bier, fairness and justice are pillars that guide our work; hence every case receives meticulous attention it deserves until a satisfactory resolution is achieved. If you or a loved one has been bitten by a dog causing physical harm or emotional trauma, count on the skilled legal support of Carlson Bier – undeniably dedicated champions redefining excellence within Illinois’ legal landscape as renowned experts in the realm of Dog Bite Injury Law.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Saint David Illinois

Dog bites are traumatic experiences that can lead to serious physical injuries as well as emotional and psychological distress. At Carlson Bier, we understand the severity of dog bite incidents and the importance of holding responsible parties accountable for your damages. Our firm is positioned in Illinois with a team of dedicated personal injury attorneys who specialize in assisting victims of dog bite injuries in taking legal action against liable individuals or entities.

Dog bite laws may seem complex but our proficient attorneys have extensive knowledge and experience in these cases. According to Illinois law, pet owners are fully responsible for their pets’ behaviors. This means if an unrestrained dog attacks unprovoked, the owner is held liable for any resulting injuries and damages caused by their pet.

As experienced personal injury professionals, there are several crucial aspects we attend to when handling dog bite cases:

• Identification of the offending animal’s owner.

• Collection of relevant evidence such as medical reports, witness accounts etc.

• Negotiation with insurance companies on clients’ behalf.

• Pursuit of maximum compensation through litigation, if required.

The injuries resulting from a dog attack can range from mild to severe. Victims may suffer significant lacerations or punctures capable of introducing harmful bacteria into the body leading to infection. Additionally, other potential complications include rabies exposure, nerve damage, permanent scarring or disfigurement and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Therefore it is vital that victims contact appropriate healthcare providers immediately after experiencing a dog-bite incident to address those health concerns timely.

The considerable cost associated with treating such wounds compounded with lost income might become unbearable for victims dealing with this traumatic ordeal. At Carlson Bier Associates LLC., we strive tirelessly so you receive fair compensation addressing not only medical bills – both present and future – but also lost earnings during recovery time; expenses related to mental health counseling & rehabilitation therapy which may be necessary due to acquired fear or phobias; plus costs involved in cosmetic surgeries needed to diminish the physical scarring.

Our Carlson Bier personal injury attorneys also place particular emphasis on the aftereffects of such incidents. We understand that the impact of a dog bite goes beyond mere physical agony. Victims’ quality of life might be significantly affected with emotional stress and trauma being common side-effects – for which our lawyers duly seek compensation addressing these profound emotional setbacks during litigation or settlement negotiations ensuring clients receive full restitution for their ordeal.

We are passionate about providing significant value to our clients, firmly believing that legal proceedings should not add to one’s existing burden but rather help alleviate it. With us at your side, you can rest assured knowing your case is in capable hands; we will tirelessly battle through complex laws and aggressive insurance maneuvers so you can focus on recovery instead.

Being transparent, we wish to clarify: Carlson Bier isn’t physically located in Saint David as specified under Illinois law – this simply means allowing citizens of St David to benefit from our empathetic attorney team isn’t outside our scope; we represent personal injury victims throughout Illinois state regardless of geographical constraints, devising winning strategies that ensure they win their deserving justice and proper compensation.

Navigating through legal complexities post such traumatic experiences could feel overwhelming, but by aligning yourself with our committed Carlson Bier associates LLC., you’re investing in an unwavering support system devoted exclusively towards safeguarding your interests when negotiating settlements or fighting cases in courtrooms for these specific injuries.

Knowing what is rightfully yours could promptly set you on the path towards mental peace and resolution. To assist further, click on the button below providing a comprehensive assessment determining the worth of your case standing against all odds – because every victim deserves justice served fittingly while leaving nothing unclaimed.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Saint David Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Saint David

Areas of Practice in Saint David

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Supplying adept legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Extending experienced legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal services to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Stumble Injuries

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to guiding sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate settlement for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Semi Collision

Delivering experienced legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Construction Collisions

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to representing victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​