...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in East Cape Girardeau

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dog bite injuries disrupt your peace of mind, seeking justice becomes crucial. This is when you need the stalwart guidance of Carlson Bier. We are a team of premier personal injury attorneys dedicated to advocating for those affected by dog bites in East Cape Girardeau. Equipped with extensive experience and unrivaled expertise, we work tenaciously to pursue the appropriate legal redress against negligent pet owners that led to your trauma. Forget settling for lesser settlements, our assertive representation will ensure your rights are thoroughly protected and adequately compensated under Illinois law. When it comes to handling this niche area of litigation involving dog bite cases – nothing parallels Carlson Bier’s perseverance or commitment towards unearthing justice; Making us an ideal choice during such challenging times. Whether you’re looking for advice on receiving reparations from medical expenses, lost income or pain and suffering – reach out today! Together, let’s attain rightful compensation so that life returns back on track following such unfortunate instances.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in East Cape Girardeau Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our specialty is representing victims of personal injuries. Our extensive experience and expertise encompass a wide range of cases, including those involving dog bites. We understand the pain, distress and turmoil that can result from an unfortunate incident like a dog bite incident. With us in your corner, you can be rest assured we’ll go above and beyond to ensure justice is duly served.

We’re based in Illinois where statistics show an increasing trend in the prevalence of dog bite cases. In fact, a significant percentage of personal injury claims are related to dog attacks; circumstances that without doubt call for expert legal representation.

It’s important to understand that injuries from such scenarios have broader ramifications than physical harm alone – they bring along both emotional and psychological trauma as well. Here at Carlson Bier we adhere to a comprehensive approach when handling such unique cases, making sure all aspects – medical bills, loss of income due to the injury, emotional distress among others – are thoroughly addressed.

In onboarding Carlson Bier as your dedicated law firm there are several things you stand to benefit:

* Expertise: With years under our belt specializing in personal injury lawsuits within Illinois State boundaries including but not limited to Southern Illinois, Northern Illinois and Central Illinois regions–we possess vast experiential knowledge on intricacies surrounding different types of personal injury claims.

* Comprehensive Case Management: We handle every detail concerning your case right from collecting evidence supporting your dog bite claim starting with obtaining photographs displaying the severity of your injuries alongside gathering witness testimonies.

* Legal Consultation Services: Guiding you through what might seem like daunting legal procedures while offering personalized advice tailored specifically for your case.

* No upfront fees provision: You only pay after we’ve successfully won compensation for you emphasizing our belief in no win—no fee principle.

What is absolutely noteworthy is that despite the seeming simplicity portrayed by mainstream television shows or movies depicting court sessions–dog bite claims litigation isn’t always clear cut. It is in such a context that you’ll need experienced lawyers like the Carlson Bier team at your disposal. We also offer negotiation skills to ensure that settlements work out favorably for our clients before trial, saving time in both court proceedings and ensuring a swift resolution.

Right from initial case evaluation to filing for legal redress while factoring possible defenses including Illinois’s One Bite Rule– we are committed in walking every step with you, making seemingly complex procedures seem manageable. Approaching us ensures an empathetic professional bearing ready to serve your best interests passionately.

In various instances, victims of dog bites remain oblivious of their due compensation extent leaving insurance providers with undue advantage. Our team possesses not only the adequate qualifications but also practical know-how necessary to tackle such scenarios delivering what is rightfully yours.

The clock on the claim period begins running immediately upon suffering injury hence acting promptly remains paramount augmenting chances for viable legal recourse. Establishing and protecting your rights early enough increases chances of winning suitable compensation when faced by aggressive dog owners or opportunistic insurers determinedly seeking quick resolutions pro them.

Our steadfast approach at Carlson Bier translates into extensive help for our esteemed clients where we guide on appropriate medical care coupled up with meticulous documentation helping us build formidable cases right off the bat resulting in swifter compensation payouts.

No one ever expects an encounter with a seemingly innocent canine friend could turn so disastrous prompting engagements with law enforcement alongside healthcare providers amid overwhelming physical and emotional pain. When meted by such grave miss-instances, remember there exists assistance compass meant just for navigating these uncharted waters–Carlson Bier!

To find how much you’re eligible for as part of rightful compensation claims pertaining to dog bites, click below whereby we’ll be ready conducting an instant thorough analysis regarding viability reviewing each detail meticulously enabling us come up with accurate evaluations in line with Illinois compensation laws.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For East Cape Girardeau Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in East Cape Girardeau

Areas of Practice in East Cape Girardeau

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving skilled legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing specialist legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, delivering expert legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Tumble Incidents

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for harms and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering adept legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to offering expert legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Trauma

Focused on representing patients with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer