...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Scott Air Force Base

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Are you a victim of a dog bite injury in the Scott Air Force Base area? The highly skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier specialize in personal injury cases such as these. Dog bite incidents can be traumatic, causing physical pain and psychological trauma compounded by medical bills and lost income. It is crucial to have experienced legal counsel like Carlson Bier on your side to ensure fair compensation for your suffering. Our team possesses an unparalleled understanding of Illinois’ complicated dog-bite laws, fighting tirelessly with dedication to advocate for our clients’ rights. We take pride in our comprehensive approach that includes investigating the incident thoroughly, negotiating assertively with insurers, and readying ourselves for trial if necessary—all aimed towards reinforcing your cause. Choosing Carlson Bier means opting for superior legal guidance—you are not just another case number; we personally resonate with each client’s situation because restoring justice is what drives us every day! Put proven expertise on your side—choose quality representation from Carlson Bier in matters concerning dog bite injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Scott Air Force Base Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we recognize the importance of educating our valued clients about personal injury law – particularly in relation to dog bite injuries. These unfortunate incidents can result in significant physical and emotional trauma, often leaving victims unsure of how to navigate their legal rights and seek appropriate compensation.

Broadly speaking, Illinois holds a stringent stance regarding animal attacks. If you or your loved ones suffer from a dog bite injury, it is crucial to understand that under the Illinois Animal Control Act (ACA), the liability for these attacks rests primarily with the pet owners. Consequently, if an unprovoked attack occurs within public space or lawfully in private space, causing bodily harm, you are entitled to receive compensation.

Three key elements need to be established: proof of ownership of the offending dog; confirmation that there was no provocation on your part, and fact-backed evidence confirming that you were behaving peacefully when attacked. In showing this supporting evidence, it becomes possible to persuade judgment in your favor under this Statute

Factors affecting your claim:

• Severity of Injury- The severity of injuries as confirmed through medical records help increase potential compensatory amounts.

• Intention behind Defense – Convincing defense narratives such as trespassing accusations could inhibit claims.

• Psychological effects– Emotional distress falls under compensable damages –the victim’s life post-attack significantly matters.

• Medical expenses– Costs for treatments including surgeries, medication, and counseling sessions factor into settlement considerations.

For further comprehension around unique facets associated with specific laws like ‘Leash Laws’ (a local ordinance) or ‘One Bite Rule’, consultational advice becomes necessary.

Regardless if it’s basic lacerations or serious conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD) subsequent to dog-bite encounters; mounting healthcare costs alongside ensuing pain & suffering may overwhelm those affected. This tumultuous scenario escalates demands for adequate reparation for accrued damages – which is where we come in!

Our authoritative and comprehensive knowledge of dog bite injury law allows us to build solid, effective cases for our clients. We work diligently, harnessing our vast resources and legal prowess to fully investigate the specifics surrounding your incident, ensuring no stone is left unturned in the bid for justice.

Document evidences promptly such as photographic records along timelines of progressive wounds, contact information belonging to eyewitnesses or medical treatment details can provide inherent advantages when processing claims. Similarly valuable is a prompt case filing; statute-driven time limitations apply within Illinois territory- hence agile action is critical.

While based in Illinois– not Scott Air Force Base – we at Carlson Bier are adaptive problem-solvers taking immense pride in standing up for personal injury victims. Our unwavering commitment lies inherently towards enforcing their rights whilst securing legally fitting recovery amounts inclusive of economic compensations (medical bills & lost earnings) alongside non-economic reparations (pain, suffering or life-quality reductions). We dole out aggressive representation targeted towards cultivating optimum outcomes; individual circumstances aligned with intelligent strategies form groundwork behind all endeavors undertaken by us!

Despite widespread notion; traversing legal terrains doesn’t need an innately combative experience, instead let it be one replete with sound guidance coupled with keen expertise steered by empathetic understanding around how devastating trauma snapshots impacting routine existence feel like!

Investing into professional assurance pays off across personal injury landscapes where singular hunches barely scratch thorough understandings reflected through years of hands-on experience. Dog-bite injury lawsuits get intricate—choosing adept champions yields monumental differences! Through every step within legal pathways‐ you get more than mere words; confident actions echo louder commitments featured on core ethos setting Carlson Bier apart from law-practicing contemporaries.

Embark this journey involving victorious strides towards reclaiming life post-trauma- trust personalized maneuvers aimed towards doggedly pursuing what’s rightfully yours! Remember – our success hinges upon yours – thus turning proverbial tables towards fair compensation becomes inherently crucial!

Let us support you in determining the worth of your case as per Illinois laws, with a detailed evaluation by our team of knowledgeable personal injury attorneys. Engage with us to explore options that best suit your situation – click on the button below for an instant quote. Your path to rightful recompense may just be one-click away! Muster strength – renew lost trust…embrace Carlson Bier’s expertise cultivating hope amid uncertain times- right now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Scott Air Force Base Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Scott Air Force Base

Areas of Practice in Scott Air Force Base

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Offering specialist legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Providing expert legal representation for victims affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Fall Injuries

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents get appropriate recompense for hurts and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Expert in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Collision

Delivering specialist legal support for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Construction Accidents

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Specializing in delivering expert legal advice for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Committed to assisting victims with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer