...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Markham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Located in Illinois, Carlson Bier is a distinguished law firm specializing in dog bite injuries. Our expertise allows us to provide the highest quality legal representation for those situated in and around the Markham region. If you or a loved one have suffered from a canine infraction, choosing our skilled attorneys could be pivotal to your case. With a meticulous understanding of state laws pertaining to animal attacks, we navigate complicated legal terrains on behalf of our valued clients. While recovery can be physically trying and emotionally draining after such incidents, Carlson Bier strives towards lightening this burden by offering dependable legal counsel every step of the way. Through commitment and advocacy grounded in years of experience handling similar cases, we aim at ensuring that justice prevails for victims suffering from dog bite distressing situations anywhere across Illinois including Markham area residents who are seeking exceptional lawyering service.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Markham Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and stress that can arise from a dog bite injury. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our commitment to you is compassional legal representation and entre dedication to achieving the best possible outcome for your case. Dog bites are often more severe than most people consider. They cause significant physical harm but also emotional distress.

Dog bite laws in Illinois hold the animal’s owner fully responsible for any harm caused by their pet. According to these regulations, it isn’t necessary for the bitten person to demonstrate that negligence was involved on part of the dog owner or prove that the dog had prior vicious tendencies for a successful compensation claim.

When reviewing a potential dog bite case, several key factors come into play:

• The severity of injuries sustained

• Whether the victim required medical treatment

• The type of medical treatment administered

• Any ongoing pain or impairment

These aspects significantly dictate how your compensation value will be determined.

Should you suffer an injury from a dog attack accident, it is crucial to take certain steps immediately:

• Seek urgent medical care: Prioritize your health first always.

• Document everything: Take photographs of injuries and keep all medical receipts.

• Contact us: We’re experienced with such cases and know exactly how to handle them professionally.

Being compassionate legal experts at Carlson Bier, we furiously fight until justice prevails regardless of how complex trying circumstances may be. While every case is unique, rest assured; you’ll have seasoned attorneys providing top-tier guidance to make sure you get compensated appropriately for both physical damages and emotional distress suffered.

Several factors are considered when determining compensations like lost wages due to missed workdays, cost of immediate medical attention needed post-injury together with future needs arising from long-term effects from severe damage inflicted like disfigurement or disability endured as consequence thereof causing psychological trauma-all which constitute part anatomy of adequate redress in situations like these.

Dog bites can cause severe emotional anguish and lasting psychological trauma that may necessitate ongoing counseling or therapy. Mental distress is a significant – yet often overlooked – component of dog bite injury claims. At Carlson Bier, we believe clients should be compensated in full for both physical and psychological harm inflicted by dog attacks. Your total well-being matters to us not just your immediate medical needs.

It’s critical to keep foremost in mind importance of prompt legal intervention soon after a dog bite incident ensues. Quick action can make significant difference between receiving full compensation you rightfully deserve against getting shortchanged from piecemeal award or worse; being denied completely as result, unjustifiably so.

Here at Carlson Bier, our team is committed to helping victims navigate complex law stipulations while providing compassionate support throughout this trying period in their lives.

Please feel free to utilize vast knowledge bank amassed over years through diligent dedication practicing law grounded upon empathetic tradition on which we established our firm built around solid dedication delivering premier legal representation, unwavering reliability coupled with unparalleled client satisfaction every time when serving those entrusting us with their cases; why settling for less isn’t options for them nor deliverables falling short thereof permissible for us.

Finally, don’t navigate this turbulent phase alone. We urge you not let the financial burden borne from aftermath of dog bites add further strain onto already emotionally charged situation naturally resulting therefrom. Click the button below now to find out what your dog bite case could be worth within Illinois legal framework. With Carlson Bier at the helm, rest assured that professional hands are steering towards a beneficial resolution that fully compensates you without leaving any stone unturned lest overlooking potential avenues justly deserving exploration maximizes settlement amounts potentially realizable due claimants seeking justice under laws applicable within jurisdiction provided by state laying down guidelines followed therein governing such affairs squarely falling under purview thereof guiding fair arbitration proceedings expected to prevail therewith unperturbed by extraneous disruptions aiming to derail same unjustifiably thwarting dispensation of justice expected at tail end thereof equally serving all parties involved impartially so as meting out dues justly owed therein meeting goals sought thereby bringing closure thereto.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Markham Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Markham

Areas of Practice in Markham

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending expert legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Extending expert legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking justice for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Crashes

Accidents: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Accident

Offering specialist legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in extending expert legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in representing individuals with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer