...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Mansfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re seeking the expertise of a reputable Medical Malpractice attorney in Mansfield, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our distinguished reputation is founded upon an unwavering commitment to champion the rights of individuals who have suffered due to medical negligence. We endeavor to secure fair compensation for loss and injuries, demonstrating our dedication to justice with each case entrusted to us. Possessing decades of combined experience handling diverse medical malpractice cases, we have honed a polished legal acumen; ensuring optimal outcomes for our clients while navigating intricate legislation seamlessly. We understand how life-changing these situations can be and ensure compassionate counsel paired with aggressive advocacy on your behalf at all stages of litigation.

At Carlson Bier, bringing accountability where it’s due isn’t just a befitted service – it’s a shared passion that fuels every endeavor we undertake. Choosing us as your Medical Malpractice attorney inherently means choosing tireless advocacy backed by superb competencies unrelenting towards delivering justice under Illinois law — because no one should confront malpractices alone.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Mansfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we recognize that sustaining an injury due to medical malpractice is not only physically challenging but can also involve a complex and stressful legal trail. As dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our foremost commitment is to enlightening you about the intricacies of this particular area of law.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider such as doctor or nurse delivers care that falls below the accepted standard, causing harm to the patient. These standards are established by the medical community and deviations can result in dire consequences for patients. Examples include misdiagnosis, surgical errors, delayed treatment, medication errors and more.

Recognizing incidents of medical malpractice involves understanding some key elements:

• A doctor-patient relationship existed: This means there was an agreement between you and the healthcare professional where they agreed to provide treatment.

• There was negligence: The healthcare provider did not meet the accepted standard of care. However, it’s important to note that unfavorable results do not always prove negligence.

• The negligence caused harm: It must be proved that it is ‘more likely than not’ that your healthcare provider’s incompetence directly led to your injury.

• The injury led to specific damages: Even if it’s evident that your healthcare provider performed below-par which may seem like clear cut malpractice – you cannot sue for malpractice unless you suffered harm. These may come in several forms including physical pain, mental anguish or financial loss.

Understanding these nuances is crucial when pursuing justice for any injuries sustained owing to medical malpractice. At Carlson Bier, we adopt a compassionate approach while accurately deciphering your case facts against these legal parameters.

We further emphasize advocating precautionary information dissemination allowing individuals access early damage control measures even before they seek formal legal advice. Always communicate openly with your doctors asking clear, frank questions relating treatment actions and probable outcomes; proactively read all medical documents before signing them; ensure speedy follow up on test results thereby mitigating chances of a misdiagnosis; familiarity with personal medical history, regular conditions and medications are valuable in all healthcare interactions.

Nevertheless, we acknowledge that despite best self-cautions at times unfortunate circumstances do occur. If you believe you’ve been a victim of medical malpractice,hiring competent legal representation should be one of your primary steps to determining the validity and potential value of your case. Personal injury law is complex, especially when it involves the vast field of medicine where defining standard care can be complicated.

Carlson Bier empowers truth seeking clients with our extensive expertise in personal injury cases related to medical malpractices, helping navigate expert consultations, facilitate critical negotiations or represent indomitable arguments in front of an Illinois juror – whatever it takes on the road to justice. Our relentless dedication isn’t merely about servicing clients but more importantly assembling profound evidence to justify each claim facilitating rightful closure for victims and their families.

As experienced professionals we understand that every claimant’s foremost concern remains how much their case could potentially be worth. It’s not just about compensation – it’s also crucial affirmation from liable parties about accepted negligence resulting in damages suffered by victims like yourself. Transparency forms the backbone here at Carlson Bier hence our sustained efforts ensure all preliminary discussions address these concerns directly.

If you’re ready to determine how strong your medical malpractice case might be or looking to acquire understandable insights – simply click on the button below right now! We are confident about delivering well-deserved justice for wronged clients like yourself fully supported by our seasoned acumen limned around what compensatory amount your unique case deserves thereby providing invaluable clarity easing your pursuit for justice. Remember disclosures at Carlson Bier prioritize ultimate client-specific confidentiality translating into optimum peace-of-mind during trying times.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mansfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Mansfield

Areas of Practice in Mansfield

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending adept legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering expert legal assistance for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering specialist legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Slip Mishaps

Expert in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal guidance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents obtain equitable recompense for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Crash

Providing adept legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Specializing in extending specialized legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Harm

Committed to defending victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer