...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Elkville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the distress of medical malpractice, you need an advocate who is experienced and relentless in achieving justice for victims. Carlson Bier is that ally – your voice amid chaos. We specialize in Medical Malpractice cases, ensuring individualized attention and commitment to every legal detail. Our law firm has a recognized statewide reputation across Illinois due to our tenacious pursuit of justice on behalf of our clients. From incorrect diagnoses to surgical errors or neglectful treatment, we fight tirelessly in these complex lawsuits against healthcare providers or institutions at fault. In such critical instances where trust was disregarded and resulted in loss or harm, we are determined to restore it by availing quality legal representation based on vast experience and innate diligence towards each case’s unique circumstances. Carlson Bier is not just any law firm; it’s the dependable force you need when seeking compensation for undue medical negligence outcomes: simply consider us as your home team advantage positioned for victory – no matter where the match takes place within Illinois’ jurisdiction.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Elkville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the importance of providing you with a clear understanding of medical malpractice cases. This monumental element in personal injury law involves an error made by a doctor or other healthcare provider that results in physical or emotional damage to a patient. Our mission is to cast light upon this complex concept, making it comprehensible while ensuring your rights are protected and justice is given.

A critical beginning point in exploring medical malpractice is being aware that not every undesirable outcome from a medical treatment or procedure equates to malpractice. For fault to be established, three key elements must be present: firstly, the existence of a professional duty; secondly, there has been breach of such duty; and thirdly, injuries directly resulted from the said breach.

• The presence of professional duty comes into play once a healthcareprovider-patient relationship exists.

• Any deviation from the standard care accepted by the medical profession will constitute as breach of duty.

• Proving that an injury was as a result of the aforementioned breach often proves challenging but can be demonstrated with proper evidence.

It’s crucial to understand these distinctions because they form the crux around which any case related to medical malpractice revolves. Importantly though, despite demonstrating fault- proving damages can sometimes prove exceedingly difficult without expert counsel such as ours at Carlson Bier.

Common instances leading up to possible claims could include:

• Surgical errors

• Failure or delay in diagnosis

• Unanticipated side effects from prescription medication

• Delivery complications resulting in birth injuries among others

Medical malpractice lawsuit time limits – referred commonly as statutes of limitations – also form an integral aspect requiring comprehension owing their specificity and influence on claim viability. In general terms within Illinois State:

Generally speaking, for most adult patients under normal circumstances, you have two years from when you knew or should’ve known about the transgression (but no more than four years after it occurred) to file suit against those responsible. For minors, under normal circumstances, they have eight years from when the transgression first occurred (provided that suit is filed before their 22nd birthday) to file a claim.

These specifics reiterate the delicate balancing act required in successfully navigating a malpractice case. Such complexities warrant expert representation and serve as motivation for us at Carlson Bier – amplifying both our relevance and unwavering commitment in guiding you toward achieving just compensation within Illinois State.

As esteemed personal injury attorneys – Carlson Bier associates and staff continuously strategize on positioning your litigation most favorably. Preexisting contacts with top experts empowering us in obtaining objective analyses; diligent exploration of facts to drive forward compelling arguments; aggressive negotiation techniques ensuring maximum settlements; typify grounds upon which our confidence draws breath. We strongly advocate professional healthcare but believe irresponsible practitioners should be held accountable.

Contacting an experienced attorney with immediate effect post-suspecting malpractice bear significant advantage given the intricate nature of these cases. You may feel blindsided by unexpected medical outcomes or overwhelmed managing recovery repercussions – rest assured, operating within this delicate confluence forms part of our mandate here at Carlson Bier.

Without trivializing any concerns lurking over what can seem like insurmountable challenges; we invite you to allow us into your world so together we might redefine circumstance into triumphs.

Your primary task? Click on the button below. Upon doing so, a free consultation awaits during which Carlton Bier aims not only to assess potential claims direction but moreover assigning compensation expectations based on merits of individual situations. So why wait? Act now- tap into experience, integrity and diligence defining cornerstone characteristics tied closely to every case presented before us at Carlton Bier Law Firm – proficient professionals dedicated solely towards championing client justice concerns while juggling themselves across medical malpractice nuances entrenched deeply within Illinois’ legal framework. Your empowerment begins with one step- taking action today anchors strength tomorrow!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Elkville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Elkville

Areas of Practice in Elkville

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Supplying specialist legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Offering professional legal advice for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing specialist legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Stumble Mishaps

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to assisting clients of car accidents get equitable compensation for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending expert legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to providing professional legal services for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and professional legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to representing persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer