Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Grand Boulevard

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a motorcycle accident in Grand Boulevard? It’s essential to have trusted legal representation to guide you through this distressing ordeal. That is where the acclaimed law firm, Carlson Bier steps in. With impressive expertise in handling personal injury cases, we specialize emphatically on motorcycle accidents litigation and support. Renowned for our exceptional approach, we prioritize your needs and well-being first while ensuring justice is served promptly and adequately. We’re familiar with the complexities of Illinois accident laws – allowing us to navigate astutely around your case providing practical strategies for settlements or court arguments if needed. Our dedicated team walks with you hand-in-hand through every process from gathering evidence to negotiating fair compensation terms within Illinois’s intricate legal framework.

Choosing Carlson Bier as your representative highlights our unwavering commitment towards safeguarding your rights when it matters most – following a traumatic motorcycle incident on Grand Boulevard.Journey alongside industry-leading attorneys – allow us at Carlson Bier help restore normalcy swiftly after such life-altering experience embracing compassion , integrity and relentless pursuit of fairness.The mere fact that we stake our reputation on each case like yours speaks volumes about the faith you can place confidently here.Choose proficiency; choose peace-of-mind; Choose Carson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Grand Boulevard Illinois

As a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier prides itself on providing specialized legal assistance for victims of motorcycle accidents. Having vast experience and deep understanding of such cases, our primary focus remains ensuring justice for those wrongfully injured. We endeavor to recover the maximum compensation possible to cover medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses that follow in the wake of these often catastrophic incidents.

Motorcycle accidents are particularly devastating due to exposed riders being confronted by larger vehicles. Notwithstanding safety equipment like helmets and protective clothing, they could still suffer life-altering injuries or even death as a result. These mishaps can arise from numerous causes which include:

• Driver negligence

• Poor road conditions

• Component malfunctioning

• Unseen road objects

Key factors we meticulously scrutinize while handling your case entail proof of negligence – demonstrating that another party’s reckless actions led to your accident; liability determination – asserting who’s at fault for the accident; and finally figuring out an equitable damage calculation strategy considering all potential damages.

Carlson Bier recognizes how complex personal injury lawsuits can take shape – especially when laws related to motorcyclists differ considerably from those concerning car drivers or passengers. Hence it becomes indispensable you engage with an attorney familiar with this specificity for optimum representation.

One important consideration is Illinois’ comparative fault rule which states if a crash victim has contributed partly towards triggering the incident (say for example was not wearing a helmet), they might potentially receive lesser compensation. Expert lawyers at Carlson Bier will ensure constructing strong legal arguments countering such claims.

A seasoned personal injury attorney from our team will guide you through processing the insurance claim including fighting off any attempts aimed at reducing its value unfairly or even denial completely. Filing lawsuit against liable parties, estimating comprehensive damages thereby arriving at a fair settlement figure, negotiation strategies with opposing counsel or insurance companies would constitute essential elements of their assistance package provided.

Contracting our services not only elevates the chances of winning your claim, but also allows you increased recovery time from your injuries without added stress of legal procedures. We invest adequate resources and time assessing each accident because we believe no two are identical – Mechanism and extent of injury, multiple parties involved, dealing with insurance adjusters etc.,differs from case to case.

Remember that in Illinois law mandates a statute of limitations in personal injury cases including motorcycle accidents. This law requires filing a lawsuit within two years from the date of the accident or discovery of injury. Here again our skilled lawyers will help meet all necessary deadlines ensuring crucial evidences aren’t lost over passage of time.

The initial consultation is always free at Carlson Bier because we believe it’s paramount for victims to learn about their rights and options before deciding on representation. Costs related to suit filing, court appearances, investigation – all are advanced by us – You owe us nothing unless we secure compensation for you!

At Carlson Bier, as mindful advocates for motorcycle accident victims across Illinois, we firmly pledge fighting tooth and nail for safeguarding your interests whether in court houses or at negotiation tables. Your peace of mind rests atop our priority list while seeking justice against erring parties causing unanticipated pain and suffering.

Act fast! The sooner you get started with Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys maneuvering your claim ,the quicker an able attorney can commence assembling essential documentation thereby setting wheels into motion towards acquiring rightful reimbursements owed to you.

Hesitant about what could be your probable monetary gain ? Gain access by clicking the button below discovering how much possibly worth could be linked to YOUR CASE… Get A step closer moving beyond this traumatic experience reclaiming deserved reparations ensuing confidently towards successful future endeavors irrespective complexities arrayed againts you !!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grand Boulevard Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Grand Boulevard

Areas of Practice in Grand Boulevard

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying professional legal support for patients of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering professional legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Tumble Occurrences

Professional in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on helping victims of car accidents get just compensation for wounds and harm.

Bike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering expert legal support for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Committed to delivering professional legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on assisting patients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer