...

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Hutsonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you are searching for a top-notch Pedestrian Accident attorney in Illinois, look no further than Carlson Bier. We represent victims of pedestrian accidents and strive to obtain the best possible outcome on their behalf. Our team undertakes comprehensive investigations and navigates complex legal landscapes with tact to secure our clients’ rights effectively. Choosing Carlson Bier brings more than just our vast experience in these matters; it means that your case benefits from cutting-edge strategies crafted by determined advocates renowned statewide for their superior proficiency in handling Pedestrian Accident cases. To residents across Hutsonville looking for uncompromising representation following a pedestrian accident, there’s simply one name: Carlson Bier – an indisputable choice borne out of exceptional services aimed at championing your cause while prioritizing human dignity above everything else. A consultation with us marks the inception of faultless progress towards achieving desired relief and compensation after suffering from an unforeseen mishap like a pedestrian accident within Illinois state limits.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Hutsonville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases with a significant focus on pedestrian accidents. Based in Illinois, our competent team of lawyers possesses extensive knowledge and experience advocating for victims involved in pedestrian mishaps.

Pedestrian accidents constitute one of the most severe types of personal injury lawsuits. A split second is all it takes to change a person’s life forever due to an unexpected encounter with a motor vehicle. Unfortunately, their consequence usually involves catastrophic harm given the fact that there is nothing to shield pedestrians from impact during such incidents.

• First off, the severity of injuries: Pedestrians affected by such situations often sustain significant physical damage—some lead to permanent disabilities or even fatality.

• The aftermath: Apart from immediate harm, victims may face substantial medical bills for ongoing treatment, pain and suffering, loss of income due to disability, and emotional distress including PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder).

• The legal aspect: Though each case varies based on specific factors such as driver negligence or lack of proper infrastructure for pedestrians’ safety; suing parties responsible whether individuals or institutions must be taken into consideration.

One might wonder why getting skilled representation from experienced law professionals like those at Carlson Bier matters so much? Here are some reasons:

• Expert handling of your case: From gathering evidence supporting your claim to negotiating settlement amounts with insurance companies, the role we play can make all the difference.

• Accurate compensation estimation: An important part of any lawsuit includes correctly assessing damages incurred as a result of the accident.

•Legal procedures & protocols adherence: Navigating litigation processes without specialized knowledge is highly challenging—it’s where our expertise comes in handy ensuring the best possible outcome for each case.

At Carlson Bier, we handle every case meticulously using thorough research techniques—equally effective strategies that allow us to create strong arguments improving chances for favorable verdicts while ensuring clients’ rights get respected throughout proceedings.

A crucial aspect tied to pedestrian accidents revolves around establishing negligence. It’s important for victims to prove that the accident occurred due to someone else’s neglect—whether another commuter or an entity responsible for maintaining safety standards on roadsides and crosswalks. Our team gathers substantial evidence—including CCTV footage, eyewitness accounts, traffic reports and more—to help build a credible case substantiating your claims.

We work diligently towards achieving maximum compensation possible. No one should have bear the financial burden triggered by somebody else’s negligent actions—that’s firm ethical principle we stand by.

• Medical expenses: We fight for complete coverage of your health bills which would include both past treatments and future medical care related to the accident injuries.

• Loss of Earnings: If an injury leaves you unable to work either temporarily or permanently; you deserve rightful compensation for lost wages as well as any negative impact on future earning capacity.

• Non-economic damages: These encompass emotional distress, pain and suffering—it forms a major part of our claim preparation inline with Illinois law.

At Carlson Bier, understand that it’s not just about winning cases but also giving clients peace of mind—a commitment underlining our approach in every action undertaken. Pedestrian accidents can be overwhelming—with physical damage accompanied by psychological trauma induced stressors; hence we adopt client-centric perspective aimed at simplifying legal proceedings making sure that you feel supported throughout this journey.

Navigating through such emotionally strenuous situations is daunting—we strive to streamline this process while focusing on securing justice complemented with rightful compensation settling all grievances incurred from accident aftermath impacts endured by affected individuals—it’s more than just professional obligation—it’s deeply ingrained Prairie State value shared across board striding hand-in-hand aiding lives get back onto feet.

By clicking on button below now, find out how worthful your personal injury case stands out potentially unveiling full-fledged compensatory owed amount concluding impactful stake ensuring brighter tomorrow awaits—your first step towards closure starts right here at Carlson Bier.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hutsonville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Hutsonville

Areas of Practice in Hutsonville

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Providing professional legal services for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing professional legal assistance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Accidents

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping patients of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for wounds and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Semi Incident

Offering adept legal advice for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cerebral Damages

Expert in offering professional legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Focused on defending clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer