FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Danville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident, all facets of your life can be affected. Carlson Bier specializes in Pedestrian Accident cases and is dedicated to ensuring that their clients receive the best possible outcomes for these often-debilitating injuries. Our team of seasoned attorneys have years of experience handling personal injury cases throughout Illinois and possess a proven track record. We work persistently to secure maximum compensation for medical treatment costs, lost wages, emotional distress, and any related expenses –ensuring our client’s rights are protected at each step. At Carlson Bier, we treat every case with utmost importance—regardless of its complexity—to deliver top-tier representation tailored specifically to meet the needs pertaining to pedestrian accidents. While many law firms may make similar claims, what sets us apart is our commitment toward thorough preparation in every single case which aids us attain favorable settlements or verdicts promptly & efficiently without compromising on quality counsel or personalized service! Trust Carlson Bier as your key advisor when navigating the complexities following a pedestrian accident; let our expert guidance help you land back on your feet swiftly after an unfortunate mishap.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Danville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our specialty lies in navigating the intricate landscape of personal injury law in Illinois with a passionate focus on pedestrian accidents. The unfortunate reality is that such incidents are more prevalent than one may think, where the balance between everyday life and catastrophic event precariously hangs by the thread of an unexpected moment. It’s critical to remember pedestrian rights and responsibilities under Illinois law, a subject matter we’re poised to guide you through.

Pedestrian accidents can be triggered by diverse components – reckless driving, intoxication, failure to yield, or even simple distractions. But it’s not merely about ascertaining fault – understanding the regulations governing pedestrian rights plays a significant role in pursuing this category of personal injury claim which unfortunately is often mired in misconceptions. Here are certain fundamental facts:

• Pedestrians hold right-of-way at both marked and unmarked crosswalks

• Drivers must stop for pedestrians within crosswalk-aligned safety zones

• Pedestrians shouldn’t suddenly leave curb into oncoming traffic

• In areas without sidewalks, pedestrians should walk against direction of traffic

Accident victims might believe insurance policies will them cover comprehensively; however they tend to overlook that insurance firms persistently work towards minimizing payouts. Understanding post-accident obligations becomes paramount here. Victims should immediately seek medical attention regardless of perceived injuries – because what might seem trivial could spur latent health complications down the line.

Documentation serves another vital function – from immediate police reports establishing on-site accident details, video surveillance footage if available, witness contact information, photographic evidence indicating vehicular damage and injuries sustained etc. Preserving these pieces of evidence bolsters your claim significantly since disputes frequently arise over liability hence solid proof assists substantiating your case.

Most importantly though is when you consult with experienced legal counsel like Carlson Bier who delve deep into these complex cases regularly thereby ensuring your interests aren’t compromised but instead maximized thoroughly relevant avenues like negotiation or trial lawsuits with insurance firms.

Pedestrian accidents also put forth questions regarding the extent of damages, medical expenses incurred and future projected, loss of income, mental trauma among others that a competent attorney adept in this specialization takes into account. Adjusters from insurance companies frequently seek settlements that don’t equitably cover victims’ damages hence professional legal advice is invaluable here to navigate towards deserving compensation.

Remember, you are not alone; our personalized approach at Carlson Bier ensures your individual case receives dedicated attention it deserves. Our powerhouse team of skilled attorneys relentlessly work towards securing optimal restitution. Your journey to recovery should focus on health restoration and let us worry about intricacies involving claim processing like negotiating with stubborn insurance adjusters or battling big-time corporations putting bottom-line ahead of your best interests.

By partnering alongside Carlson Bier’s expert professionals who understand nuances of pedestrian accident law within Illinois landscapes extensively, you can rest assured knowing we’re tirelessly advocating on your behalf. We realize each story is unique with divergent circumstances hence we make certain to consider every possible detail exclusively tailoring strategies best suited for your case standards thus making sure justice isn’t merely sought but served diligently.

We invite prospective clients interested in understanding their legal positioning post pedestrian-accident scenarios better – Click below to get started with our comprehensive case evaluation form designed to establish what your case could be potentially worth! Trust in the expertise offered by Carlton Bier where dealing with victim rights awareness and navigating personal injury laws specific to Illinois counts upholding plaintiff’s entitled compensations lies at heart of our core operations. Remember – when it comes to fighting for just compensation after experiencing life-altering mishaps – look no further than Carlton Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Danville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Danville

Areas of Practice in Danville

Cycling Collisions

Proficient in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying expert legal advice for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring specialist legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Stumble Incidents

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Damages

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to helping individuals of car accidents secure just settlement for harms and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Incident

Delivering expert legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for damages.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to offering compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Damage

Expert in representing clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​