FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Hometown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you experience a slip and fall accident in Hometown, seeking legal help quickly is essential. This is where Carlson Bier steps in – your most reliable partner for unwavering support and expert legal representation. Our skilled attorneys have an unparalleled track record of handling these particular types of cases with finesse, securing favorable outcomes for our clients. At Carlson Bier we understand the distressing aftermath of such accidents; hence, each case’s approach embodies empathy, precision and dedication whilst keeping Illinois laws governing personal injury at the forefront. With us by your side, navigating through complicated legal processes becomes less daunting since we prioritize clarity every step along the way making sure justice isn’t just served but also understood. Choose Carlson Bier to champion your cause after a slip-and-fall accident in Hometown because when it comes to safeguarding your rights within complex correctness boundaries – no one does it better than us.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Hometown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to aiding victims of personal injury resulting from various accidents, including the all-too-common slip and fall incidents. As a reputed law firm headquartered in Illinois, our attorneys are well versed in handling cases related to these unfortunate mishaps – often caused by uneven surfaces, unmarked obstacles or insufficient lighting. With a deep understanding of Illinois laws concerning property owners’ obligations towards potential hazards on their premises, we strive to bring you justice if you were harmed due to someone else’s negligence.

Slip and fall accidents can result in varied levels of harm- minor bruises and sprains or severe injuries like fractured bones, spinal problems, or traumatic brain injuries. These physical repercussions lead not only to medical bills but also financial loss owing to lost wages during recovery time – a double blow that is both unfair and unacceptable. That’s where we step in at Carlson Bier. We help ensure that people responsible for maintaining safe environments bear liability for any harm that comes through their neglect.

Key aspects about slip and fall lawsuits include:

• The paramount requirement: To show that the owner failed in his duty of care toward ensuring safety on their premises.

• Proof aspect: Demonstrate causal links between the owner’s negligence and your injuries.

• Comparative negligence: In some circumstances, even when you’re found somewhat at fault, Illinois follows comparative negligence law which still allows compensation – albeit reduced by your degree of fault.

The legal landscape associated with such personal injuries could be intricate; hence choosing an experienced attorney becomes key in reclaiming rightful damages.

Remember this:

• Medical evidence plays an instrumental role in such claims – always seek professional help post-incidents.

• Report the incident immediately (if occurring on commercial properties.) Preserve evidence if possible–photos/videos etc.

• No immediate obvious injury doesn’t mean no harm–some issues present late; consult professionals nonetheless.

Carlson Bier takes pride in harbingering skills honed over years of dedicated service, particularly in slip and fall injury law. Unfailingly staying abreast with ever-evolving laws ensures our lawyers battle every claim assertively – maximizing compensation for victims.

The key to a successful slip and fall claim is immediate action. Most importantly, remember not to discuss your case or sign any documents from insurance companies without first consulting with an attorney – these companies are focused on reducing their payouts and initial offers might not be fair compared to actual losses incurred.

At Carlson Bier, we offer free case evaluations where you can learn more about potential legal avenues open after such an accident. We operate on a contingency fee basis which means that we only charge if you receive compensation– ensuring no financial risk at this challenging time.

Our goal at Carlson Bier is simple: deliver value-rich services and ensure just outcomes for those unfortunate enough to experience harm they didn’t invite upon themselves. Our team bear testament to our commitment–determined trailblazers equipped with the knowledge, resourcefulness, and dedication needed to advocate relentlessly for clients’ rights.

Finally never underestimate the worth of your case! Far too often, individuals accept settlements far below what they deserve simply because they aren’t aware of their full entitlements under Illinois’ personal injury laws. This dilemma ends today by letting us aid you in understanding the rightful worth of your predicament. Ready to take control? Click on the button below for a free evaluation of your case; let’s discover how much it’s truly worth together- all part of providing seamless legal assistance where needs exist simply because justice delayed might as well be justice denied–a notion absolutely unacceptable here at Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hometown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hometown

Areas of Practice in Hometown

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving expert legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering specialist legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, providing professional legal assistance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents receive fair compensation for hurts and impairment.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering expert legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Dedicated to offering compassionate legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Specializing in defending clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​