Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Godley

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a spinal cord injury can have far-reaching and potentially devastating impacts on your life. Every case is unique, warranting personalized attention and comprehensive understanding offered by Carlson Bier – your reliable personal injury law firm in Illinois advocating robustly for spinal cord injuries. We understand the anguish and trauma an individual endures following such impairments, as our primary focus centers around alleviating this burden through outstanding legal representation. At Carlson Bier, we emphasize justice for our clients; integrating an intelligent approach with vast experience that culminates into unflagging advocacy powerhouse to earn successful results tirelessly. Our proficient lawyers comprehend the complexity of these intricate cases while meticulously constructing solid litigation strategies to secure optimum compensation every victim undoubtedly deserves without compromise. If you or a loved one are grappling with the aftermaths of a spinal cord injury, choosing us means entrusting yourself in capable hands dedicated toward helping you navigate this challenging journey towards rightful restitution. We represent resolute commitment; accelerating beyond boundaries to ensure your voice carries weight against adversities arising from spinal cord injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Godley Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are poised to underscore the severity and legal implications of spinal cord injuries, with a focus on catering our expertise to individuals in Illinois. Spinal cord injuries can be profoundly life-altering events causing detrimental repercussions such as paralysis or severe weakness in parts of the body below where the injury occurs. Navigating through these challenges requires expert guidance which is just what you get when choosing Carlson Bier personal injury attorney group.

The successful management of a spinal cord injury case starts with an understanding of its causes. Such injuries most commonly occur following accidents like motor vehicle crashes, falls, sporting accidents, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. The subsequent physical trauma can cause disruption or even damage to nerve fibers within the spinal cord disrupting normal functioning; henceforth leading to partial or complete disability.

A key concern for victims suffering from spinal cord injuries is the immediate medical costs that can be overwhelming – from initial hospitalization, surgical interventions if required, during rehabilitation phase – which all adds up quickly. Furthermore, ongoing treatment costs associated with managing long-term health impacts (like persistent pain) continue over time. Often overlooked are collateral damages – loss of wages due to disability combined with drastic lifestyle changes including altered family arrangements or significant modifications for accessibility at home – all contributing to socioeconomic burden.

For cases concerning compensation related to a spinal injury it’s important you keep certain things in mind:

• Immediate consultation with an experienced lawyer post-accident.

• Documenting your condition thoroughly right after sustaining an injury.

• Maintaining a record of doctor visits aligned chronologically.

• Following prescribed treatment plans religiously without lapse so there’s evident proof that any residual disabilities you might struggle with were directly caused by your accident.

Working promptly on these considerations will improve chances your claim establishes liability effectively and ultimately results in maximum possible compensation.

In situations derived out from negligence – someone else’s reckless behavior inflicted harm unto you- it’s crucially important we work to establish that evidence strongly. Gathering valid proof, corroborating witness accounts of the incident, and further validating negligence through forensic data where available is done meticulously and promptly by our team at Carlson Bier. Our dedicated approach has proven successful for countless victims that now realize a fair outcome –

It’s equally important however that clients understand the limitations within Illinois law – namely the statute of limitations. Basically, you have a limited time after sustaining injury wherein you can file a lawsuit legally in Illinois State courts; this window generally lasts for two years from date of said accident or knowledge thereof on your part. Understanding these kinds of intricate, specific laws involving personal injury law (like Spinal Cord Injuries) demands having expert legal counsel like us at Carlson Bier who address client matters adeptly.

At Carlson Bier our commitment signals fervent representation ensuring painstaking precision with your case every step along the way – always starting out by understanding deeply how such an incident disrupted life as you may have known it before. Your spinal cord injury undoubtedly caused more than just physical harm possibly resulting in emotional trauma which shouldn’t be minimized when making a claim.

In light of all the complexities inherent within raising Spinal Cord Injuries related claims successfully under Illinois law, consider securing aggressive yet compassionate legal representation from us at Carlson Bier where we continually serve crucial support necessary for our clients to tide over turbulent times offering them sturdy closure doing so too.

We extend an invitation now encouraging you to capitalize upon our expertise hereafter using our interactive tool towards better understanding what compensatory value might exist relevant to your specific case potentially – click below henceforth assessing deserving remunerative justice coming to hinges bringing about much-needed peace going forward thereby facilitating restoration serenely post-adversity unto victory achieved eventually expeditiously – backed by Carlson Bier steadfastly therein navigation throughout resiliently by side reinforcing.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Godley Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Godley

Areas of Practice in Godley

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending adept legal support for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending expert legal services for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Trip Accidents

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for damages and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Accident

Offering expert legal assistance for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Committed to delivering expert legal representation for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and expert legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Focused on defending individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer