...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Flanagan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to legal representation for Spinal Cord Injuries, depend on the unrivaled expertise of Carlson Bier. We understand that dealing with a spinal cord injury disrupts your life significantly; our attorneys are here to reduce your stress and guide you through the complex legal process. Our world-class firm comprises seasoned and compassionate lawyers who prioritize your welfare while focusing fiercely on securing fair compensation for all damages suffered due to another’s negligence. Capitalizing upon years of experience in personal injury law, we excel at promulgating persuasive arguments using rigorous investigation methods intertwined with our deep understanding of Illinois laws regarding spinal cord injuries. Moreover, Carlson Bier’s phenomenal success rate testifies its dominance in this niche over competitors across Flanagan—making us an outstanding choice for representing victims like you affected by such serious injuries. Placing great value on transparency and integrity, we promise diligent engagement with every client’s case ensuring that each detail is meticulously evaluated before formulating a strategic plan-of-action tailor-made to meet their specific needs effectively.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Flanagan Illinois

Spinal cord injuries can certainly be life-altering events with far-reaching implications, but the emotional pain and suffering endured should not go unrewarded. When it comes to seeking justice for your spinal cord injury, trust Carlson Bier, a renowned law firm in Illinois equipped with expert personal injury attorneys who are devoted to their clients’ rights and well-being. Spinal cord injuries encompass an array of afflictions ranging from herniated disks and pinched nerves to severe conditions like paralysis. It is important that clients understand these nuances, which is why we have provided extensive educational content below.

First among them, it’s crucial to comprehend how spinal cord injuries occur. They usually result from traumatic events such as vehicle accidents or falls that exert significant force on the spine. Sports incidents or violent encounters could also cause this kind of damage.

• Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: This ranks highest among types of spinal injury conditions. Their sudden onset due to external physical impact leads directly to damages onto the spine.

• Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: These develop over a longer period due to disease processes within the body affecting the spine progressively.

At Carlson Bier, our objective extends beyond court proceedings; it includes facilitating knowledge sharing that eases comprehension of complex legal technicalities related to spinal cord injuries.

Filing a claim after a spinal cord injury can be complex; however, understanding the following bullet points when pursuing a lawsuit can prevent potential mishaps:

• Statute of Limitations: You typically have two years from the date of injury in Illinois under most circumstances to file suit, but there may be exceptions.

• Demonstrating Negligence: To win compensation in any personal injury case, one must prove negligence – establishing how another party’s reckless act led directly to your injury.

• Evaluating Damages: Accurate calculation of damages involves consideration for present medical expenses alongside future care needs, lost earnings (current & future), psychological vision, and pain & suffering.

Given the nature of these critical factors to consider when dealing with spinal cord injury cases, it’s wise to consult with experienced personal injury attorneys like us – Carlson Bier. Our commitment towards fighting for our client’s rights transcends through our persistent pursuit of maximum compensation packages paralleled with providing clients essential knowledge about their case type.

The journey post-spinal cord injuries can indeed be daunting and filled with uncertainties. However, know that you barely have to face it alone as long as a reputable law firm like Carlson Bier is on your side. Our litigation track record, coupled with demonstrated expertise in personal injury law across Illinois stands tall amongst competitors ensuring you the best chance at securing ample compensation.

We hope that this content has brought valuable knowledge regarding spinal injuries directly before you. Remember, engaged enlightenment serves as the first step towards empowering yourself enough to confront adversities head-on after enduring a spinal cord injury. For more tailored advice concerning potential personal injury lawsuits surrounding spinal cord affliction incidents – reach out today to your trusted advocate – Carlson Bier.

Lastly, know how much your case may be worth before advancing forward under legal proceeding landscapes. As specialists in tackling personal injury scenarios around Illinois, we at Carlson Bier extend an invitation for you to discover what monetary damages you could potentially claim through our special ‘case worth’ feature just below—a simple click could unveil great insights related directly to your unique circumstances—an advantageous initiation heading into realizing eventual justice claims over time! Your strength aided by our potent support system ensures winning prospects headed your way in the face of adversity post spinal-injury experiences.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Flanagan Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Flanagan

Areas of Practice in Flanagan

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Supplying specialist legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending experienced legal advice for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Tumble Incidents

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Accidents

Collisions: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents gain equitable compensation for injuries and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Committed to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to providing professional legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Wounds

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Focused on advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​