Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Thomasboro

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with a life-altering spinal cord injury, it’s vital to secure the best legal representation possible. In such cases; Carlson Bier law firm in Illinois is one of your top choices for uncompromised advocacy. Our team of staunch personal injury lawyers specializes in handling spinal cord injuries, exhibiting an unmatched passion and dedication towards helping victims receive maximum compensation. Skilled professionals at Carlson Bier understand the catastrophic impact these serious injuries can have on you and your loved ones’ lives. Hence, we work relentlessly using our extensive experience and proven track record to fight for justice effectively on your behalf. The opportunity to serve residents of Thomasboro remains a significant part of our mission as personal injury attorneys dedicated to help those who are suffering from debilitating spinal cord injuries within their community too. We’re motivated by our commitment toward ensuring that negligent parties pay fair restitution while striving hard so that every client secures optimal care they rightly deserve after sustaining such profound traumas.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Thomasboro Illinois

Spinal cord injuries can be devastating, often involving life-altering consequences that significantly infringe on both an individual’s freedom and quality of life. At Carlson Bier, we recognize the weight these accidents bear on the victims and their families. As a trusted law firm based in Illinois, our highly dedicated team continuously explores every possible avenue to ensure you receive fair representation.

• Depth of knowledge: Our expertise in personal injury includes an indispensable depth of knowledge about spinal cord injuries that range from incomplete spinal cord injury (partial loss of function) to complete cord injury (total loss of function).

• Trained professionals: We have professionally trained attorneys who understand all aspects associated with such cases like medical complexities or circumstances leading to the incidence.

• Specialized approach: Each case is unique and requires a specialized approach. Carlson Bier adjusts and tailors its strategies as per your specific scenario.

Comprehending Spinal Cord Injuries

A basic understanding assists in appreciating why acquiring proper legal representation is critical. The spinal cord’s primary role is transmitting signals from the brain across your body; hence any harm disrupts this communication process causing functionality impairment. Depending upon the occurrence location and severity, it may lead to paraplegia or quadriplegia.

• Paraplegia implies when the person loses sensation and control over lower limbs; primarily due to incidents affecting thoracic level or below.

• Quadriplegia or tetraplegia denotes severe conditions where patients lose total control on limbs including torso; primarily those accidents impacting cervical spine area.

Frequently Asked Questions About Spinal Cord Injury Cases:

Understanding complex details involved could be overwhelming for clients which is why we present some most commonly addressed questions:

What are common causes? Motor vehicle accidents account for highest incidences followed by falls, violence-related scenarios or sports injuries.

Can I claim compensation if partially responsible for my injury? Illinois’ system follows modified comparative negligence rules meaning if you’re less than 50% responsible, you can claim respective compensation.

Can I sue the manufacturer of a defective automobile part that contributed to my injury? Yes. Under product liability laws, manufacturers are held liable for injuries resulting from defects in their product.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t merely offer representation; we provide reassurance and concrete actions underpinned by expertise for favorable results. We pursue exhaustive investigations to collate substantial supporting evidence focusing on elements essential in establishing negligence: responsibility breach causing your injury directly resulting in loss/damage.

Why Choose Us:

• Profound understanding: Our experienced attorneys understand extensive nature of these cases’ physical, emotional and financial implications.

• Unyielding commitment: The gravity of these cases compels our unyielding dedication towards achieving fair compensation entitled to you- whether medical expenses, pain or suffering, rehabilitation costs or lost wages.

• No upfront fees: Knowing how financially straining such situations could be, we work on contingency basis which means no payment unless successful recovery for your case.

As an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois with special focus on Spinal Cord Injuries, Carlson Bier does not shy away from standing up against insurance firms trying to dismiss claims unjustly. We diligently shine light into negligence leading to your unfortunate episode making sure injustice doesn’t prevail.

Now being enlightened about key facets associated with spinal cord injuries should fortify faith regarding soundness of seeking legal aid along this life-altering journey! Bring closure by ensuring accountability is met and deserved compensation provided. To ease this decision process further for your peace of mind – click below! Obtain free evaluation determining worthiness on pursuing litigation process with us – reinstating control over a situation injuriously snatching it away originally!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Thomasboro Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Thomasboro

Areas of Practice in Thomasboro

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying professional legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Incompetence

Extending experienced legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal assistance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Tumble Incidents

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents get equitable remuneration for damages and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Big Rig Incident

Delivering expert legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Committed to delivering dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer