...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Belleville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, it’s essential to have representation from a highly skilled law firm. Carlson Bier, renowned for its extensive experience in Spinal Cord Injuries litigation across Illinois, is your preeminent choice for reliable legal representation. Our dedicated attorneys understand the life-altering impact of such injuries and will seek maximum compensation on your behalf. We focus on providing personalized services attuned to our client’s unique situations and needs; ensuring swift resolution while maintaining utmost professionalism.

Moreover, Carlson Bier takes pride in employing state-of-the-art techniques — with thorough investigation methods being our hallmark. The firm’s expert understanding of spinal cord functional anatomy and associated complications gives us a distinct advantage when devising case strategies.

Regardless of how intricate or overwhelming the situation might be; trust that you are choosing unparalleled expertise and commitment with Carlson Bier—a testament proved through past success stories—making us one stellar choice when seeking guidance related to Spinal Cord Injuries litigation anywhere across Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Belleville Illinois

At the Carlson Bier law group, we understand how catastrophic spinal cord injuries can be for victims and their families. We emphasize on providing comprehensive assistance from initial consultation right up to conclusion of your case through accrued experience in injury litigation. Our firm is based in Illinois and proficient in handling critical personal injury cases judiciously.

Spinal cord injuries are often life-altering, resulting from serious vehicular accidents, falls, sports-related incidents or direct violence. Such instances may lead to severe implications including paralysis (paraplegia or quadriplegia) or compromised control over limbs resulting not only in physical suffering but also significant emotional distress and financial hardship.

To provide you with a clearer perspective:

– The severity of spinal cord injuries ranges broadly from mild strains to complete ruptures that cause full body paralysis.

– Symptoms accompanying these traumas include pain, weakness in the muscles, loss of sensation and impaired function of organs.

– Medical events such as heart problems, pressure ulcers, blood clots and lung complications frequently occur as secondary issues aggravating patient’s medical status further.

– Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation remains lengthy requiring constant medical care which often leads to mounting debt burdens along with lost wages owing to inability to continue regular employment ties

When it comes to legal provisions surrounding spinal cord injury scenarios:

– Injured victims have an absolute right under Illinois law to assert a claim against any entity liable for their harm.

– A wide scope of recovery damages apply encompassing past/future medical expenses, loss incurred due to inability-to-work (lost wages), diminished quality-of-life besides pain & suffering endured by victim directly related to inflicted trauma.

Carlson Bier successfully represents clients across Illinois who are affected by said traumatic experiences while consistently striving towards securing maximum feasible compensation for them. You can rest assured our priority being safeguarding your interests with dedication rooted deep into a solid foundation of supreme professionalism blended seamlessly with empathy considering plight faced by each client coming under our purview. We assure you, at Carlson Bier group, you’re not a case number but an individual whose rights are given paramount importance.

Every spinal cord injury poses unique clinical and legal implications that demand comprehensive understanding on part of your chosen attorney for strengthening your claim to the highest capacity. The skills honed by our lawyers over years coupled with compelling advocacy techniques direct us towards delivering justice swiftly while aligning ourselves steadfastly with standing Illinois laws. Our credibility is anchored in successful representation of clients resulting in recovering millions of dollars which instills faith into new victims approaching us for assistance and guidance bolstering their chances of rightful recovery.

Navigating through legal intricacies can be daunting, making choosing the right legal counsel imperative for holding accountable parties answerable. Thus catering to this crucial aspect we invite you to utilize free initial consultation service provided ensuring utmost transparency simplifying complicated facets related to spinal cord injuries evidencing our devotion towards assisting those seeking justice leveling playing field favorably on their behalf against bigger formidable opponents we often face courtrooms representing them fearlessly.

The road to recovery from a spinal cord injury requires immense strength—physical, emotional, and financial—which should ideally commence right after sustaining such critical trauma. Remember; time is precious because Illinois law stipulates specific time constraints called statutes-of-limitations where delayed action might render your rightful claims void post expiry period allowed legally! Hence acting promptly becomes essential advocating your causes assertively without losing precious time!

Click on the button below now if you or your loved one have suffered from severe impacts of Spinal Cord Injuries, explore what provisions potentially available await unsuspectingly for turning lethal misery into a significant monetary relief easing hardships faced drastically during arduous journey towards recuperation! Let’s find out how much YOUR case could possibly be worth together marching forward shoulder-to-shoulder bravely conquering adversities lie ahead positively!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Belleville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Belleville

Areas of Practice in Belleville

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending adept legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Providing expert legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Tumble Mishaps

Adept in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their damages.

Childbirth Injuries

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on aiding clients of car accidents obtain equitable payout for hurts and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering specialist legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Committed to delivering specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Committed to representing victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer