...

Wrongful Death Attorney in Stone Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When tragedy strikes in Stone Park, Carlson Bier stands as the premier choice for wrongful death representation. Our esteemed group of personal injury attorneys appreciate that the loss experienced by family members is insurmountable; therefore, we put every effort into fiercely advocating on their behalf. At Carlson Bier, our track record speaks for itself – vast experience in delivering justice through meticulous preparation and aggressive litigation strategy. As dedicated professionals well-versed with Illinois law, we ensure maximum compensation while empathizing with your emotional trauma during such challenging times. It isn’t merely about legal expertise: at its core, it’s about prioritizing human values and maintaining equality within courtroom boundaries—a principle upon which Carlson Bier thrives relentlessly every day. To engage a team that works passionately to impart courage and restore justices amidst profound grief choose none other than Carlson Bier when seeking Wrongful Death attorney services near Stone Park.

About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Stone Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated team of personal injury attorneys committed to advocating for individuals and families who have been tragically affected by wrongful death in Illinois. With our profound experience and mastery of the intricate legal landscape surrounding wrongful death, clients can rest assured that their case is in trustworthy hands.

Wrongful death pertains to circumstances where a person dies due to the negligence or misconduct of another party; usually these events are completely preventable making them all the more devastating. The loss experienced goes beyond emotional trauma – it often inflicts significant financial stress onto the decedent’s family. Here at Carlson Bier, our mission is aimed at redressing this imbalance by obtaining maximum compensation on behalf of our clients whose losses resulted from someone else’s negligence.

Essentially, when dealing with wrongful death cases, several pivotal elements need to be established:

• Proof of death

• Evidence showing negligence or direct causation

• Monetary damage as a result of the said death

Understanding these factors can be a challenge for those not conversely educated in law practices hence why retaining an experienced attorney is crucial during this demanding time. Our lawyers pledge to shed light on each aspect of your case allowing you to make informed decisions.

Comprehending how damages are calculated in wrongful death cases is equally vital. Compensation typically covers areas such as medical bills incurred prior to the person’s passing, funeral expenses, lost earnings (current and future), loss of companionship/consortium and much more. Having represented numerous families throughout Illinois over years gives us insight into accurately establishing such damages.

In addition – but seldom mentioned – loved ones may endure economic losses that can extend decades into the future following tragic events leading to wrongful deaths especially if they were depending on deceased’s income. Our priority involves ensuring that clients do not bear an undue economic burden added onto their immense emotional hardships.

Furthermore, there exists a statute of limitations for filing wrongful death claims which essentially sets a limit on the timeframe for bringing forth a lawsuit. In Illinois, such claims ought to be filed within two years from the date of the deceased’s passing; but there exist certain caveats. Without proper guidance one could unwittingly miss critical deadlines. Our attorneys will make sure all legal procedures and timelines are adhered to.

The level of representation you receive can significantly impact your case’s outcome – so might does your choice in an attorney. So why choose Carlson Bier?

• We offer free consultation: Engage with us without any financial commitment.

• No win, no fee guarantee: Our payment is contingent on winning your case.

• Extensive experience: With years of handling wrongful death cases we bring valuable insight and sharp legal strategies to fight for our clients’ rights.

Among others we stand out because of our strategic approach towards every unique case that lands on our desks underpinned by relentless determination to obtain justice for grieving families beset with devastating accidents leading to wrongful deaths.

Wrongful death situations are unfortunately more common than we would hope and undoubtedly tough on those left behind grappling with emotional torment that it brings forth making it imperative to have seasoned, supportive legal help in navigating these turbulent times.

With this background information about wrongful death, perhaps it seems challenging deciphering how much your potential claim may be worth after suffering such enormous losses both emotionally and financially. The value largely depends on different variables unique to each specific circumstance giving rise sometimes complex computations especially when predicting future earnings or placing value loss consortium simply not being feasible without professional help ensuing compensatory damages secured adequately represent client’s concerns.

While every detail shared here serves as a basic guideline around wrongful death laws in Illinois, feel encouraged click on the button below allowing you get immediate insights into potential worthiness your case according its own respective details guided by expert knowledge gleaned over years successful representations honing our craft remain steadfast champions justice states like ours fraught hurtful instances negligence leading fatal outcomes — because everyone deserves rightful compensation serve as beacon hope amid darkest times navigating legal maze.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Stone Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Stone Park

Areas of Practice in Stone Park

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or perilous conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending professional legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Incompetence

Extending professional legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying skilled legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Neglect

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Trip Injuries

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Damages

Extending legal aid for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Accidents

Accidents: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring professional legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Committed to defending patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer