...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Saint David

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unpredictability of life results in personal injury, you need the assurance that comes with having Carlson Bier by your side. Representing a long history of dedication and unwavering expertise in personal injury law, our firm stands unmatched when it comes to defending your rights. Leveraging decades of experience handling sensitive cases from Saint David’s community, we understand the profound impacts these unfortunate occurrences can trigger on every level – psychological, emotional or financial. While any legal journey can be fraught with complexities, Carlson Bier ensures these hardships do not deter you from achieving justice and fairness. Our core mission is advocating for individuals who feel overwhelmed amidst challenging times due to no fault of their own . It’s not just about offering representation; at Carlson Bier we’re committed to walking alongside you through each step until resolution is achieved.At heart,Clients value our strategic approach combined with compassionate services making us synonymous with reliability across Illinois’ legal landscape.Middle Content

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Saint David Illinois

When you require trusted, knowledgeable representation in the complex field of personal injury law, turn to Carlson Bier – renowned across Illinois as a tireless advocate dedicated to fighting for justice on behalf of their clients. Our seasoned team of attorneys are committed to securing the highest possible compensation following an accident or incident caused by another’s negligence or wrongful behavior.

Personal injury law covers an extensive spectrum of scenarios and situations. Cases typically involve incidents where one party’s negligence or deliberate action has resulted in injuries, harm or distress to another individual. This can range from motor vehicle accidents and slip-and-falls at business premises, to medical malpractice cases and product liability claims.

• Motor Vehicle Accidents: These represent a significant portion of personal injury cases. If you have been involved in any vehicular collision due to other’s disregard for road safety rules, we are prepared with specialized knowledge necessary for successful resolution.

• Slip-and-Fall Cases: If you have slipped, tripped or fallen on someone else’s property because they failed to maintain a safe environment, Illinois law may entitle you to damages.

• Product Liability Claims: Were you injured due to faulty products? We can provide vigorous legal counsel against corporations and manufacturers who’ve made unsafe goods available to consumers.

• Medical Malpractice Cases: Did your health-care provider deviate from accepted standards causing harm? Through rigorous investigation and advocacy, our lawyers will battle relentlessly towards just recovery.

Striving ceaselessly towards holding negligent parties accountable while ensuring victims gain rightful compensation is what sets Carlson Bier apart. We navigate through nebulous complexities making this daunting process smooth, accessible and manageable even amidst emotional turmoil following personal injury incidents. Be assured that our commitment extends beyond abstract principles; every case presents us with an opportunity to uphold justice while alleviating distress caused by these unfortunate circumstances.

Our expertise rests not merely on litigating but diligently investigating each case amid intricate layers revealing true culprits hiding behind veils of obscure legalities. Depth, insight and meticulous preparation formulate our foundations for unassailable cases against those responsible for your harm.

Understanding the life-altering impact that injuries can cause, we offer compassionate representation tailored to every individual client’s specific needs and circumstances. Respected throughout Illinois’ legal community, we’re known for never shying away from persistently pushing forward until satisfaction is reached.

Drawing upon our formidable trial experience paired with an acute sense of empathy towards victims’ plight, Carlson Bier has proven exceptional ability not merely winning claims but also understanding complex pain trajectories forging stronger bonds with clients beyond conventional lawyer-client relationships. Our extensive network of medical professionals helps evaluate the long-term ramifications of various injuries, guiding case strategy and ensuring comprehensive claims include potential future damages.

We beckon you to trust our skilled team spearheaded under missions stressing unwavering dedication towards maximum recovery keenly aware that winners in injury claim cases are often those better prepared. Your decision today could profoundly influence tomorrow’s horizons altering the course furrowing through tricky judicial landscapes. We at Carlson Bier take pride in traversing these landscapes not merely as dutiful lawyers but wholly committed confidants standing firmly beside while steering you toward a more hopeful tomorrow.

In this complex realm of personal injury law where uphill battles challenge the toughest spirits – rest assured – at Carlson Bier – strength embraces adversity easing transitions restoring harmony to disrupted lives. Harnessing expertise borne out years valiantly fought cases paired with relentless determination confronting adversaries assures your search ends here!

For invaluable insight into how much your personal injury case may be worth, don’t hesitate! Reach out to us by clicking on the button below and let’s begin this guided journey towards justice together without further delay! You ask why Carlson Bier? Because when standing before towering legal challenges – Experience matters as compassion counts!! And remember — No recovery…No fee!!!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Saint David Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Saint David

Areas of Practice in Saint David

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing skilled legal support for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Extending expert legal assistance for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal support to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Trip Injuries

Adept in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal help for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding clients of car accidents receive equitable compensation for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Mishap

Providing specialist legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Brain Harms

Specializing in offering specialized legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on supporting persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​