FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Abingdon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When considering an attorney for spinal cord injuries representation in Abingdon, the law firm Carlson Bier is a top choice. With profound expertise and relentless dedication to justice, our professional team effectively advocates for clients affected by spinal cord trauma. Your well-being is our priority; we ensure you receive deserved compensation while recovering from your traumatic ordeal. Being a reputable personal injury firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier doesn’t merely offer legal services – it provides steadfast support throughout what may be one of life’s toughest battles.

Our knowledge and skill in navigating complex health care laws are unparalleled–that’s why many put their trust on us when grappling with such critical instances requiring legal action. Whether dealing with delicate negotiations or assertive court representation against those responsible for this harmful negligence, every client’s case receives our utmost attention to detail and tenacity.

Spinal cord injuries can dramatically alter lives forever—don’t face it alone! Trust that at Carlson Bier, we focus on your case so you can focus on healing. Partner with us today- let experience triumph where circumstance threatens injustice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Abingdon Illinois

Spinal cord injuries represent one of the most catastrophic and life-altering events a person can experience. Through no fault of their own, individuals dealing with such adversities encounter not only physical pain but also emotional turmoil and immense financial stress. At Carlson Bier, we extend our expertise in personal injury law to robustly champion for victims of spinal cord injuries throughout Illinois.

Understanding the magnitude of spinal cord injuries is central to acknowledging how significantly they impact lives. The spinal cord operates as an essential information superhighway between the brain and body. Damage here often leads to partial or complete loss of motor control and sensation below the level of the injury – termed paralysis.

Such injuries are classified into two: complete and incomplete spinal cord injuries. Complete suggests total lack of sensory and motor function below the injury level while incomplete indicates some remnant functions still exist. Both forms result in varying degrees of paralysis – paraplegia (affecting lower limbs) or tetraplegia (affecting both upper and lower limbs).

• Paraplegia results in impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities.

• Tetraplegia implies impairment affecting all four limbs, including torso muscles.

The origin of these severe medical conditions ranges from road accidents, falls, violence incidents, sports-related accidents to diseases like cancer. Moreover, there may be lasting effects beyond mobility loss that include respiratory complications, bladder problems, bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction among others.

Navigating these complexities requires a wealthful knowledge base on both medical aspects intertwined with understanding legal perspectives involved – areas Carlson Bier excels at integrating effectively. As dedicated advocates for injured persons across Illinois; we consistently bring forth aggressive representation to hold accountable those responsible for causing such devastating consequences.

Further highlighting this scenario’s seriousness underlines why affected parties must pursue adequate compensation from liable entities promptly due to:

1) Extensive long-term medical costs

2) Rehabilitative therapy expenses

3) Loss of earning capacity

4) Replacing or fixing damaged property

5) Coping with emotional pain and suffering

The Carlson Bier Group takes on the task to significantly relieve your stress by proactively handling your case and therefore allowing you to focus more on recovery. We diligently assemble strong cases backed by supportive evidence, expert testimonies, thorough analysis while considering uniquely individual needs. Our law firm’s long-standing track record of securing just compensation, which aptly mirrors our clients’ injuries severity and impacts on their life quality, proves itself testament to our absolute commitment.

Legal interventions in spinal cord injury cases are complex; the negotiation process can be arduous; insurance companies might employ tactics to devalue claims or delay settlements. Yet with Carlson Bier’s significant experience working with insurance companies’ modus operandi, we empower our clients when it matters most – all through the labyrinth of legal proceedings till justice prevails.

Remember, time is crucial in filing a personal injury lawsuit due to Illinois’ statute of limitations typically limiting such action within two years from the date of accident causing the injury. The sooner you connect with us at Carlson Bier, the earlier we can initiate processing your claim steadfastly towards achieving optimum results in recovering suitable damages for suffered trauma.

Spinal Cord Injuries undeniably turn lives upside down but finding appropriate legal recourse shouldn’t further burden already strained victims or their families. You’re not obliged to face this daunting pursuit alone – Trust in Illinois-based Carlson Bier’s powerhouse representation that profoundly resonates both compassionately and fiercely when it counts!

Our conveniently located offices across various cities ensure that wherever you are throughout Illinois – be it Chicago or Rockford – help is never far out of reach!

Don’t let another day pass without taking steps towards reclaiming your life post-accident cause every moment lost could potentially result in losing rightful compensation you deserve standing up against those responsible parties. Simply click the button below to find out how much your case is worth today!

Choose Carlson Bier – Your rights, our fight!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Abingdon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Abingdon

Areas of Practice in Abingdon

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving specialist legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Incompetence

Offering experienced legal advice for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering adept legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Tumble Injuries

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents get reasonable payout for harms and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Mishap

Delivering expert legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for losses.

Building Crashes

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Specializing in ensuring expert legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in representing persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​