FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Albany Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or your loved ones face the trauma of a dog bite injury in Albany Park, it’s essential to have dedicated legal representation. Trust Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based personal injury law firm specializing in dog bite injuries. We understand how these cases can be emotionally draining and financially taxing. Our committed attorneys will meticulously work to investigate your claim, identify liability, and pursue maximum compensation from all responsible parties on your behalf. Equipped with extensive experience in handling intricate injury cases across our state jurisdiction, including Albany Park region; we apply our targeted knowledge and expertise to ensure every client receives justice. Recognizing that strong relationships often underpin successful outcomes; we prioritize personal attention at each step of the legal process. Partnering with us means entrusting a firm proven for its relentless determination towards achieving favorable results for clients impacted by dog bites incidents. Regardless of the nature or complexity of the case, Carlson Bier stands ready supported by years validated commitment exclusively serving victims throughout Illinois; strengthening resolve as unwavering defenders against negligence causing harm.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Albany Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to providing comprehensive legal support for victims of dog bite injuries across the state of Illinois. As a leading personal injury law firm with decades of combined experience, our skilled team addresses some of the most common concerns and aspects related to such incidents in an endeavor to provide our readers with valuable insight.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical and emotional distress, often necessitating extensive medical treatment and time off work. A significant impact could be on a victim’s quality of life, potentially restricting their daily routine due to complications stemming from these injuries. The extent to how much this affects you only emphasizes why it’s pertinent that there is someone who can rightfully advocate your cause – offering guidance through the complex layers that entail a personal injury lawsuit associated with dog bite cases.

Understanding Illinois’ Dog Bite Statute is critical when pursuing compensation for your injury, as specific elements need proving:

• Showing uninspired or unrestrained action by the dog

• Verifying you had lawful grounds where the incident occurred

• Certificate that points out no provocation from your side towards the attack

If successfully proven, then you could receive financial compensation covering more than just immediate medical costs. Depending upon circumstances like severity, recovery duration or long-term effects of the bite may invite eligibility for pain, suffering or even lost wages during recovery.

There are precise statute limitations on filing a claim for a dog bite injury in Illinois. Generally, you have two years from the date of your biting incident to file an official claim; however, distinct complexities might affect this duration. Delayed legal action could potentially jeopardize your ability as well as right to recover damages. Hence establishing early contact with experienced attorneys like us at Carlson Bier would assist in navigating these pitfalls effectively.

As expert personal injury lawyers confronting numerous cases each year attains us proficiency understanding distinction between breeds besides identifying compelling evidences coupled strategically planned counterarguments safegaurding rights while maximising potential for increased compensation.

Carlson Bier, insists on personal approach prioritizing your conveniences: offering free initial consultation schedules, minimal disruption routines as all procedural activities handled by our team and “No win-No fee” service commitment guarantees you pay nothing unless we successfully claim indemnification rewarding your patience and trust in us.

In addition to representing dog-bite victims, it’s also important to address information related with preventative measures. Never provoke or approach a strange dog without the owner’s consent; avoid eye contact which can be interpreted as direct threat and always provide space when encountering dogs with puppies. Additionally teaching children appropriate behaviour when interacting with pets could significantly reduce associated risks for minor age groups being involved in such incidents.

Facing a dog bite incident is undoubtedly traumatic but staggering financial burdens coupled physical pain need not linger beyond necessary – that’s where the understanding legal experts of Carlson Bier step in! They say “every dog has its day”, make sure yours doesn’t come at the cost of your well-being.

The first steps after suffering an injury are difficult ones – knowing what course to take next can often lead to more questions than answers. If recent unfortunate circumstances have left you or someone you care about bitten, scarred or immensely terrified due lost sense of security post a canine attack incident then having your queries adequately addressed may light an obscured path towards justifiable recovery. We encourage you to take advantage of our available resources elucidating rightful actions after battling an unfortunate event including significant insights that may answer common concerns aiding clearer perspective searching justice. Click on the button below today and find out how much your case is potentially worth; contending rights necessitates powerfuy knowledge one mustn’t hesitate acquiring if it helps their cause!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Albany Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Albany Park

Areas of Practice in Albany Park

Bicycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Providing expert legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Offering expert legal services for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying professional legal services to clients affected by defective items.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Trip Mishaps

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Traumas

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents receive reasonable payout for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Crash

Offering specialist legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Harm

Expert in defending patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440