FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Albers

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the aftermath of dog bite injuries, expert legal representation is critical to ensure you obtain a fair settlement. As your trusted partner, Carlson Bier can navigate through often complex legal processes on your behalf. Based in Illinois, our attorney group specializes in personal injury cases like Dog Bite Injuries and brings a wealth of experience to bear on any case concerning such incidents. We understand that every detail matters when building an ironclad case for damages; therefore, we meticulously examine all aspects of the incident – from establishing liability to quantifying damages appropriately. Not only does this approach maximize potential rewards but it also alleviates stress from victims who are already grappling with physical pain and emotional trauma after a biting incident. Don’t let fear or uncertainty deter you from pursuing justice; choose Carlson Bier as your advocate because we are committed not just to winning cases but ensuring no victim suffers unnecessarily due to another’s negligence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Albers Illinois

On the website of prominent Illinois law firm Carlson Bier, we appreciate the community’s needs for clarity and understanding concerning Dog Bite Injuries. Recognized as an expert in personal injury practice areas, our legal team offers comprehensive knowledge and experience to assist victims striving for justice.

Dog bites can lead to trauma surpassing physical injuries, extending into psychological distress and financial burdens from medical bills. At Carlson Bier, we believe in empowering our clients with crucial educational content that aids their understanding of these complex consequences. The key considerations following a dog bite incident include:

• The triggering factors: An important point relates to identifying what triggered the attack. A dog could react due to provocation or fear, in defense of its territory or puppies, or perhaps due to known aggressive behavior.

• Required documentation: Reporting any bites to local animal control agencies ensures there’s reliable documentation about the incident—critical when pursuing any legal action.

• Medical attention: Seeking immediate medical help is vital not only for addressing and documenting wounds but also potential disease transmission.

• Emotional fallout: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common aftermath of serious dog bite incidents which may require professional mental health treatment.

The laws governing this field vary across states; armed with detailed knowledge about Illinois’s specific statutes vis-à-vis dog bite liability lies at the heart of your claim’s trajectory. According to Section 16 of the Animal Control Act in Illinois, “If a dog or other animal attacks a person unprovoked on public or private property causing injury, then its owner is liable for civil damages.”

At Carlson Bier, we abide by rigorous scrupulousness regarding laws regulating legal advertising within Illinois state lines – compliance stands testament to our commitment towards ethical legal service provision. As professionals practicing law with admonitory integrity– acknowledging complexities surrounding geographical limitations asserted by law–we cater deeply committed representation without identifying linkages to locales devoid of substantive presence like Albers.

Detailing a fair settlement scale for compensation following dog bite incidents can be challenging without appropriate legal counsel. It hinges on multifarious factors including the severity of injuries, permanency of scars or disfigurement, medical expenses, any lost wages owing to inability to work during recovery – and not forgetting the emotional trauma experienced.

Since years Carlson Bier has diligently worked towards securing rightful compensation that covers these aspects for our clients in personal injury cases – your justice forms our foremost goal. Our expertise ensures we leave no stone unturned in guaranteeing victimized individuals receive recompense commensurate with the suffering endured due to irresponsible pet ownership.

We understand just how devastating such an incident can be; it’s our mission to navigate you seamlessly through this complicated process – setting sights on speedy and maximum possible settlements profoundly worthy of your experience and traumas endured. A steadfast commitment from Carlson Bier aids in asserting tangible justice rooted evidence-based legal arguments spun around unique merits embedded within individual case fabrics while addressing your worries about potential avenues for monetary relief following dog bite incidents.

Notably, the majority are unaware of their potential entitlements under statutes influenced by recent court rulings transforming dog-bite regulations. This highlights why seeking expert help is deemed crucial when dealing with cases like these – stepping up against negligent animal owners is a serious task requiring high-caliber professional guidance. Shouldering these burdens should never fall onto victims alone!

Unquestionably, Carlson Bier stands as an unwavering pillar—providing comprehensive know-how transparency translating doubts into confidence bolstered by credible legal insights that form your pathway towards reclaiming control over unfolding realities underlined within life post-incident experiences readable via physical scars accompanying invisible ones etched across mental health surfaces weighed down heavily by biting incidents rung alarmingly into birth by canine pets gone rogue.

Are you wrestling with traumas gifted unwelcome wholly by reckless pet owners? The time-tested proficiency hosted responsibly at the helm of Carlson Bier’s professional parade towards justice execution beckons. Engage us by clicking on the button below now to understand where stand in terms of correctly estimating how much your injury case might be worth. Let our extensive experience within this realm build bridges reconnecting you with life ascertained pre-incident causality underpins dog bite experiences unfortunately holding reign over personal turmoils right now! Would it not comfort knowing projections drawn around case-worth estimates await conveniently just a click away from being unveiled for cogent intake?

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Albers Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Albers

Areas of Practice in Albers

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering skilled legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring expert legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying skilled legal support to victims affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Tumble Accidents

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Incidents

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents get appropriate payout for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing expert legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Damages

Focused on delivering dedicated legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on defending persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​