...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Aledo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve experienced a dog bite injury in Aledo, Carlson Bier’s team of dedicated personal injury attorneys are ready to fight for your rights. Our expertise includes severe lacerations, puncture wounds, psychological trauma and infections caused by canine attacks. With the rapid escalation of dog-related injuries nationwide, our firm takes pride in advocating for victims within Illinois and holding negligent pet owners accountable. While focusing primarily on compensation aspects including medical costs or lost wages due to recovery time off work – we never overlook the emotional turbulence that accompanies these unfortunate incidents. Each client receives personalized attention at Carlson Bier as we understand every case is unique; however traumatic they may be. We fully leverage years of practice in personal injury law to ensure that we give nothing but the strongest representation possible—making us stand out amongst other law firms dealing with similar cases. Trust that choosing Carlson Bier means investing not just in proficient legal counsel but peace of mind during this challenging time too.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Aledo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing legal assistance to those who have experienced the trauma of dog bite injuries. Based in the heartland of Illinois, our team is well versed not only in national laws pertaining to personal injury but also carries specialized knowledge regarding state-specific legislation. With a proven track record, we aim to provide thorough and comprehensive education on this specific area of personal injury.

Dog-bite injuries range from minor punctures to severe attacks that can cause permanent disfigurement or even death. Certain breeds may be more prone to biting than others and contribute disproportionately towards these cases, yet it’s essential to understand that any breed can be dangerous under certain circumstances. Quick statistics suggest that between 4.5–4.7 million people suffer from such incidents every year within the U.S., subsequently implying the magnitude of this issue.

Experts at Carlson Bier believe that an informed client is a confident client; hence, we wish to shed light on key details:

– Dog owners are liable for their pets’ behavior: In Illinois, unlike some other states which operate under “one bite rule,” dog owners are strictly held accountable for their dogs’ actions regardless if there has been evidence of previous aggressive behavior.

– Time limitation: The statute of limitations in Illinois gives you a two-year window following the attack incident to file your case legally.

– Role of negligence: If it gets proved that your behavior triggered or contributed significantly towards attack instigation then it might reduce overall compensation

Now some facts about what damages could extend towards:

– Medical Expenses: These encompass all costs right from emergency care immediately after the accident through ongoing medical treatment.

– Pain and Suffering: An often-underestimated factor involving physical pain endured along with emotional stress caused over time.

You need robust representation navigating this complex network of laws besides negotiating adequate settlement claims successfully; This calls upon specialists like us at Carlson Bier dealing exclusively in personal injury cases. We always work diligently to maximize your potential compensation.

Getting precise answers for dog bite incidents depend on multiple factors including, but not limited to the victim’s age and physical condition, severity of injuries, negligence status etcetera. Our team thus recommends immediate consultation following such an incident.

Imagine converging all your focus towards recovery rather than dwelling in the intricacies of law and protocols – What a relief that would be! That’s precisely where Carlson Bier steps in; we handle everything from case investigation documentation through aggressive litigation or skillful negotiation as needed.

Remember, seeking experienced legal help at the earliest could significantly influence the compensation you are rightfully entitled for your ordeal – This might range from thousands to hundreds of thousands potentially depending upon individual case specifics!

At Carlson Bier, we do not believe ‘one size fits all’ hence consider every single detail while analyzing unique statement circumstances before mapping out strategic action plans. By keeping clients informed every step forth, we ensure transparency builds trust which subsequently reflects within our thriving client-relations.

Our objective is simple: Advocating uprightness within our practice benefiting justice processes concerning victims rightfully claiming desired compensations – after all fairness is core human privilege regardless of situations defining it.

Circumstances following dog bite incidents can often appear seemingly overwhelming with layers of confusing bureaucracy impeding straightforward resolution paths however with us beside no situation feels unnavigable indeed. The power lies within awareness; indeed you CAN pivot distress into success leveraging proper guidance combined with competent representation!

Time proves critical here! Do not delay reaching out— taking immediate action increases chances garnering earned justice perfectly supported by potential comprehensive claims assuring passageway towards restoration consequently.

Take advantage now by clicking on the button below to have one of our dedicated legal experts assess your unique case specifics comprehensively illuminating legitimate claim worth potentially awaiting just round-the-corner — After all being informed denotes first decisive victory step leading towards complete empowerment progressively!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Aledo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Aledo

Areas of Practice in Aledo

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or risky conditions.

Thermal Damages

Supplying adept legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Negligence

Delivering specialist legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Collisions: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents receive fair settlement for hurts and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Specializing in assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer