Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Aledo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re facing the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, you need representation that’s both compassionate and aggressive. Carlson Bier prides itself on bringing not only tenacity to the courtroom but also personal dedication. Our legal expertise in handling spinal cord injuries is second to none, offering robust services within Aledo for those affected by life-changing circumstances. Every case we take is treated with utmost respect and priority because we understand how critical this situation can be — your health, your future, it all matters greatly to us. We at Carlson Bier work tirelessly to ensure maximum compensation for medical costs or lost wages, addressing clients’ concerns with empathy and extensive knowledge of Illinois’ laws surrounding such injuries. Let our proven track record serve as assurance; we’ve stood up against insurance companies unflinchingly before – always with our client’s best interest at heart – and continue doing so fiercely even today. Choose Carlson Bier—partnering unparalleled attentiveness with potent advanced litigation strategies—for representing your spine injury case.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Aledo Illinois

Spinal Cord Injuries are complex injuries that can have a profound impact on the quality of life for those who experience them. Whether resulting from car accidents, falls, sports injuries, or any other circumstances leading to severe trauma to the spine, these injuries often result in partial or complete paralysis and long-term disability. Recognizing this immense challenge faced by our clients, we at Carlson Bier have honed our expertise in representing spinal cord injury victims and fights tenaciously for their rights.

The physiology of Spinal Cord Injuries can be quite intricate; hence an understanding is necessary. The spinal column consists of delicate nerves that facilitate communication between your brain and various body parts. Damage inflicted upon this structure often disrupts these signals, leading to a loss of feeling and control over limbs below the injury site, otherwise known as paralysis.

Spinal Cord injuries entail two distinct types:

• Complete – where there’s total loss of sensory and motor function beneath the level of injury.

• Incomplete – where some nerve impulses can still travel pass the point of injury.

Depending upon location along your spine where an injury occurs determines what functions get disturbed. For instance:

• Cervical (Neck) injury will likely affect both arms and legs also referred to as quadriplegia.

• Thoracic (Chest Level) might affect legs only called paraplegia.

Here at Carlson Bier, we understand how overwhelming it can be dealing with such devastating physical changes concurrently navigating daunting legal complexities related to personal-injury lawsuits. Our team compassionately walks with you through every step while tirelessly advocating for maximal compensation encompassing medical costs, rehabilitation expenses, lost wages during recovery time, pain & suffering caused by accident-induced disabilities.

We also guide you through crucial elements constituting Spinal Injury based lawsuits like establishing negligence from opposite party – fault or carelessness causing harm- proofing linkage between apparent negligent behavior leading directly/indirectly to your injury, demonstrating the comprehensive impacts of spinal injuries on your life. It may include outlining complete scope for past and future challenges plus quality of life disruption prompted through harm inflicted upon you.

Treatment prognosis for such kind of injuries vary depending on severity in each case. However, typically Spinal Cord Injury treatment encompasses immediate emergency care, possibly surgery(decided on case-by-case basis) followed by protracted rehabilitation including physical therapy. Part of our responsibility involves ensuring that resulting compensation cover these long-term medical costs along with providing aid for necessary accessibility modifications to client’s home or transportation ongoing nursing care/home health aide if required and addressing any other related concerns arising during course of recovery period.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that every injured person deserves fair justice against those who caused their condition unknowingly or negligently. Through our dedicated support system combined with relentless legal pursuit anyone grappling with aftermath of tragic spinal cord injury can manoeuvre their new reality while feeling vindicated knowing they got comprehensive justice wherever legally possible.

An experienced advocate handling personal-injury lawsuits in Illinois will inevitably have an intimate understanding of local court procedures and state laws protecting personal injury victims allowing them make appeal better framed within suitable legislatures optimizing chances for successful outcome further strengthened by partnering up with expert witnesses like doctors therapists occupational-specialists thereby creating a powerful case designed intending maximum reward potential.

Navigating personal-injury claim after a severe occurrence like Spinal Cord Injury can be complex challenging hence don’t shoulder this burden alone instead contact Carlson Bier today start strategizing towards reclaiming deserved compensation aiming brokering semblance peace given situation unleashing newer possibilities beyond concern about financial uncertainties.A bit curious? Why not click on the button below to receive a fuss-free indicative assessment about what your specific case could be worth; remember it’s entirely without obligation seguing opportunity investigate options would best suit pursuing around these disturbing circumstances.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Aledo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Aledo

Areas of Practice in Aledo

Bike Crashes

Specializing in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering professional legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Providing professional legal advice for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering expert legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Slip Accidents

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal aid for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents receive just recompense for wounds and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring adept legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to extending expert legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in defending clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer