...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Alexis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve suffered a dog bite injury in Alexis, Illinois, Carlson Bier is here to help. We stand out as your most reliable choice for expert legal advice and representation on Dog Bite Injuries. Our attorneys have years of experience with personal injury law, providing unmatched services that prioritize our client’s needs and rights above all else. Complex laws govern these cases in Illinois and we understand the subtleties of each ensuring maximum compensation under the legal provisions available through meticulous case preparation. As well-known knowledge bearers of personal injury legislation specific to our state, navigating through procedures has become a dynamic competency area – being prepared is integral in these disruptive times following an unforeseen incident such as a dog attack. Entrusting your case with us means choosing unwavering dedication to quality service; choose guidance that alleviates worry by using precision-driven strategies aimed at achieving favorable results for you . Choose Carlson Bier– untangling complex issues requires expertise infused with understanding: let us bring clarity amidst chaos and offer refuge from uncertainty.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Alexis Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases—including a particular focus on dog bite injuries. We understand that an unanticipated event of this nature can be life-altering and distressing. Our dedicated lawyers bring both the empathy and experience needed to successfully advocate for victims of dog bites throughout Illinois.

Dog bites are more common than many people realize. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), approximately 4.7 million individuals suffer from dog bite injuries each year, with around 800,000 requiring medical attention. Not only is the physical harm caused by these attacks often severe but also can lead to emotional trauma that lasts far beyond the incident itself.

Key factors related to personal injury law surrounding dog bite cases:

• Illinois follows a ‘strict liability’ doctrine when it comes to dog bites— This means owners are liable if their pet injures someone else unless the victim was trespassing, provoking the animal or willingly took the risk knowing the animal could become aggressive.

• The nature and severity of your injuries – Financial compensation depends largely on how grave your injuries are; including costs such as medical expenses, lost earnings due to being unable to work during recovery, psychological counselling fees etc.

• Documentation is fundamental – It comprises photographic proof of injuries and circumstances at attack site plus relevant medical records, which will strengthen your claim.

Navigating personal injury law related to dog bites can be complex. There are various legal considerations involved—from assessing who bears responsibility for the accident (based on factors like leash laws and prior evidence of aggression) right through determining settlement amounts which encapsulates future needs such as ongoing therapy sessions or corrective surgeries.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier consistently devote themselves wholeheartedly in getting clients what they deserve interspersed with top-quality care they warrant after enduring traumatic incidents like a dog bite injury. Here’s what you can expect while working with us:

– Unmatched Client Care: We treat each case with the importance it deserves, offering personal attention at every step of the way.

– Financial Recovery Support: Our dedicated team explores all legal avenues to secure optimal financial recovery for our clients.

– Comprehensive Legal Expertise: We steer your path through this complex process ensuring a streamlined journey amidst intricate legislations by exploiting our exhaustive knowledge and skill base.

Indeed, Carlson Bier offers representation you can trust in handling your dog bite injury claim. While these traumatic incidents are certainly challenging, they’re not insurmountable—not when you have an experienced and approachable ally safeguarding your rights.

Feeling overwhelmed? Uncertain about what lies ahead after a dog bite injury? You don’t have to face this alone—let Carlson Bier shoulder the burden for you. Remember that while we champion statewide victims of dog bites across Illinois, any suggestion or implication that we function out of the city of Alexis is unfounded since we strictly comply with state law stipulating physical existence in claimed office locations.

Discover how much worth does your case hold financially as part of realizing your right to compensation. Find clarity in procedural questions like things to do immediately after surviving a terrifying dog attack or appraise long-haul facilities that experts envision necessary integral within recuperation estimates apart from seeking free consultation regarding insurance claims intricacies—all aimed towards reinstating normalcy post distressing mishap.

Take action against those responsible for exacerbating circumstances leading up-to traumatic experiences while standing tall amid life-altering calamities – click on the button below for an instant evaluation concerning possible monetary benefits linked with your unique scenario.” Explore avenues where possibility meets actuality!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Alexis Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Alexis

Areas of Practice in Alexis

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Extending professional legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal advice for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Trip Occurrences

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents secure just payout for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Mishap

Providing expert legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Focused on ensuring specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Skilled in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Focused on assisting patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer