...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Algonquin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal representation for dog bite injuries in Algonquin, Carlson Bier embodies an unparalleled commitment to justice. With potent expertise concentrated on personal injury law, we specialize in navigating the complex intricacies of dog bite cases. Our team at Carlson Bier meticulously assesses each case to devise strategic plans geared towards securing maximum compensation for victims. Dog-related injuries can be severe and life-changing; our seasoned attorneys ensure thorough exploration of every aspect of your claim, verifying comprehensive evaluation of medical expenses, psychological trauma and potential loss earnings. We understand that surviving a traumatic incident requires unwavering support; hence we offer unceasing dedication from initial consultation up until the closure of your case. With a proven track record extending beyond Illinois borders; clients entrust their legal battles to us with confidence because we consistently demonstrate aptitude by transforming adversity into triumphs. Choosing Carlson Bier will not just provide you access to leading experts in dog bite litigation but also align you with compassionate advocates who pursue rightful recompense relentlessly amidst challenging circumstances. Experience unparalleled service with us today – championing justice is our foremost pursuit!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Algonquin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that uncertainty and confusion often surround the adverse situations of personal injuries, particularly the ones inflicted by dog bites. As a renowned Illinois-based Personal Injury law firm, our primary objective is to guide you through the complexities associated with dog bite injuries. Despite being widely normalized and often shrugged-off, these injury cases can be quite severe, encompassing both physical and emotional traumas. We believe that solid knowledge about your entitlements and legal rights during such instances is crucial for justice.

Dog bites lead to serious injury consequences – they may not only leave you physically scarred but also emotionally traumatized. Injuries vary from minor ones like bruises or scrapes to major ones including deep puncture wounds or even amputations in extreme cases. While physical injuries are apparent, psychological impact often goes unnoticed – victims may suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders or severe phobias related to dogs.

Here are some key aspects related to dog bite injury settlements:

• Identifying Liability: In majority of cases it’s usually the dog owner who’s held liable for their pet’s aggressive behaviour unless provocation on the victim’s part can be established.

• Understanding ‘One-Bite Rule’: Illinois operates under this rule which states if it’s proven that a dog has never shown aggression in past than its owner may not be held responsible for its first biting incident.

• Insurance Claims: Approximately 98% of all bodily injury liability insurance claims paid out is ascribed to dog-bites annually thereby placing great importance on insurer-party negotiations.

• Illness and Diseases: Dog bites could lead to infections requiring extended treatments; rabies being one of lethal diseases one might contract.

In view of these severities around dog bite incidents, we at Carlson Bier strive hard towards making sure victims get wholesome compensation for their suffering while offering adept representation throughout legal proceedings. Our tried-and-tested strategies aim at securing maximum recovery, thereby helping clients to cope with their medical treatments and therapies swiftly.

The documentation of bite incidents is a compelling aspect of these injury cases. Comprehensive records such as photographs of injuries sustained, medical reports reflecting the severity of the injury, location where the incident took place and any witness accounts are vital features that our skilled attorneys emphasize on extensively. It’s of paramount significance to understand how accurate evidence can strengthen your lawsuit ensuring fair justice.

It should be known that Illinois statute limitations allow you two years from the date of biting-incident to file a lawsuit for compensation. While this may seem long it really isn’t when you consider gathering substantial evidences along with spot-on legal consultation. Delaying could potentially result in loss of important proof which can dangerously debase your claim. Hence seeking immediate legal advice advantageously positions you better within suit frameworks by retaining most crucial information.

At Carlson Bier we don’t just prepare strong defense aspects with laudable arguments but also try making entire process smoother for our clients through compassion and detailed counseling assistance. We’re fervent about easing victims’ agonies however possible while relentlessly battling injustice faced by them emphasizing accountability and rightful compensations.

To wrap it up, if you’ve been bitten or attacked by a dog resulting in personal harm, knowing your rights under law would enable claiming reimbursements releasurably whereas adept legal representation will amplify chances towards gaining large overlooked compensations consequently benefiting from otherwise strenuous circumstances.

Now imagine: having access to professional representation without exorbitant costs; plentiful consultations navigating legal terrains seamlessly; expediting settlements while maximising recoveries – Click on button below now! And let no precedence deterred immediately ascertain what your dog bite injury case worths leveraging comprehensive expertise from Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys at once!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Algonquin Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Algonquin

Areas of Practice in Algonquin

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying professional legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Extending experienced legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on assisting patients of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Providing experienced legal support for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in providing specialized legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in supporting persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer