...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Alhambra

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the heart of Alhambra, nuances around Dog Bite Injuries can often be complex and overwhelming without expert legal guidance. Understanding these intricacies is a specialty perfected at Carlson Bier, an exceptional personal injury law firm located in Illinois. With impressive tenacity and unparalleled expertise in this field, our attorneys are adept at navigating the uniquely challenging dynamics associated with Dog Bite Injury cases. As your trusted advocates, we meticulously dissect all facts surrounding each occurrence to ensure victims get fair compensation for their injuries while maintaining absolute adherence to Illinois legal provisions . At Carlson Bier, it’s not just about closing case files; it’s about changing lives one successful case result after another. We strive to deliver remarkable legal representation that transcends beyond winning litigation by creating impactful experiences through empathetic understanding and unwavering commitment to our clients’ recovery journey. Turn potential stress into relief by trusting us as your ultimate defender against dog bite injustice because at Carlson Bier, everyone deserves justice prevailed over their pain!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Alhambra Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we seek to provide insight and guidance through the complex nexus of personal injury law, particularly in the realm of Dog Bite Injuries. Having served clientele throughout Illinois with unwavering dedication for years, our status as experienced personal injury attorneys equips us to champion your rights assertively and efficiently.

Dog bite injuries are an unfortunate yet common occurrence across households in the state. As practitioners well-versed in Illinois’s unique legal framework surrounding this issue, it is imperative to throw light on several fundamental aspects that victims need to consider.

• The Severity of the Injury: Once medical attention has been sought after a dog bite incident, it’s vital to evaluate how grave or otherwise debilitative the injury is. Such understanding plays a crucial part in calculating compensation figures later on.

• Examination of Evidence: Whether it’s photographs of injuries sustained or vet records of the involved animal – these pertinent pieces give shape to an effective lawsuit strategy.

• Determining Liability: Proving the dog owner’s negligence can be a pivotal point in securing favorable outcomes. If you show that excessive leniency was granted towards a potentially dangerous pet, then chances are high for achieving damages recovery.

Exercising caution around unfamiliar animals is always true wisdom; however, unanticipated incidents might occur nonetheless. When they do happen, seeking redress promptly becomes necessary as per Illinois Law since victims generally possess two years from their accident date within which to file a case. Our team at Carlson Bier can come alongside you during such times – working tirelessly behind-the-scenes while offering attentive counsel that steers you through often nerve-racking legal proceedings proficiently.

Legal recourse under scenarios like Dog Bite Injuries aligns with principles underlying broader tort law – encompassing right-to-safety notions for citizens amidst society space shared commonly with pet owners who ought maintain responsible ownership over their animals within reasonable limits set by regulations keeping public interest upfront.

Damage categories that potential claimants can explore, based on eligible situations, are as follows:

• Medical & Future Treatment Expenditure: Any current or predictive future medical costs stemming from the incident – this includes doctor’s visits, surgeries, medication, therapy etc.

• Emotional Distress: This takes into consideration the psychological impact of the event. Trauma and fear are common occurrences post serious dog bite incidents.

• Loss of Income: If time-off work was needed for recovery purposes or if one’s earning capability got reduced due to permanent injuries.

Here in Illinois, all these aspects garner high importance before legal courts upon determination of deserving recompense figures. Carlson Bier carries a commendable track record towards advocacy within such nuanced sectors – our personal injury attorneys serving profitability interests for those we represent diligently across each case phase till final settlement derives successfully.

As your personal advisors and champions during such challenging times, Carlson Bier emanates assurance that you’re not alone with growing complexities surrounding Dog Bite Injury Lawsuits. Our team prides itself on impeccably handling nuances about other individuals’ negligent actions whilst seeking justice and rightful compensation therein vehemently on your behalf.

To find out how much your case might be worth and take one step closer towards getting desired relief through professional assistance at Carlson Bier – click the button below now! Remember – seeking redress via claiming damages is not just within your rights but can contribute importantly in bringing accountability towards pet owners while sending signals encouraging more responsible behavior community-wide. We assure devoted representation with unabridged commitment blended meticulously with mastery over tort law specifics making us second to none when it comes to guarding victims’ best interests amidst adverse aftermaths of unfortunate Dog Bite Incidents. We’re here to guide you along every step beginning your path towards recovery while leaving no stone unturned ensuring justice prevails duly following adversities sustained from grievous canine-related injuries!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Alhambra Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Alhambra

Areas of Practice in Alhambra

Bicycle Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving adept legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering expert legal services for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Stumble Injuries

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents obtain just payout for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing adept legal advice for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Specializing in delivering specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Focused on defending victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​