...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Allendale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you are looking for proficient representation following a dog bite injury in Allendale, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our distinguished team specialises in personal injury cases similar to yours and possesses the expertise to achieve favourable outcomes with dog bite injuries. Guided by an understanding that every case presents unique challenges, our attorneys proactively address each concern with diligence and professionalism. We provide guidance on Illinois state laws regarding animal attacks, help determine liability, and advocate tirelessly for your rights as a victim of such unfortunate incidents.

Our vast experience in this specialized field makes us second-to-none when it comes to handling intricate legal processes around these situations. Indeed, we attribute our outstanding reputation within Allendale not just to court victories but also client satisfaction being at the heart of every decision made at Carlson Bier.

In dealing with the aftermath of a traumatic event like a dog bite incident neutrality is crucial; allow us here at Carlson Bier safeguard your interests against insurance companies so you can obtain fair compensation whilst focusing on recovery from trauma sustained physically or emotionally.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Allendale Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expertise lies in the realm of personal injury law and we’re centrally focused on representing those affected by dog bite injuries in Illinois. Navigating through the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be overwhelming; not only do you grapple with physical pain but also emotional trauma that persists long after the incident. Our aim is to alleviate these distressing facets by diligently fighting for your rights and ensuring that you receive rightful compensation.

Understanding what constitutes as a dog bite injury is crucial towards building a robust case. According to Illinois Animal Control Act, liability follows from any instance where an animal attacks or injures a person without provocation while out of their property boundary. Consequently, dog owners bear full responsibility should their pet inflict harm upon someone else in such circumstances.

The havoc posted by dog bites often extends well beyond ordinary flesh wounds – consider these catastrophic outcomes:

• Severe lacerations and puncture wounds

• Significant blood loss

• Possible fractures or dislocations

• Infections including rabies or cellulitis

• Psychological trauma which may result in fear or post-traumatic stress disorder

It’s noteworthy to remember that immediate medical attention takes precedence over everything else following such incidents. It serves dual purposes – firstly addressing health concerns effectively, secondly establishing accurate documentation of inflicted injuries which becomes invaluable during litigation processes.

Subsequently assessing the value of your claim depends on multiple variables –

• The severity and nature of injuries sustained

• Cumulative medical expenses inclusive diagnostic tests, treatments, surgeries if applicable, prescriptions etcetera.

• Lost wages due to inability to work during recovery period.

• Compensation seems viable even for non-economic damages for trauma endured – fear & anxiety predicated on statistical findings stating nearly 20% adults develop cynophobia (fear of dogs) following pathological encounters with them.

At all junctures it’s imperative maintaining detailed records corroborating your ordeal which acts instrumental while claiming compensations. This includes everything from medical bills, records of treatment procedures undergone to evidence demonstrating mental anguish and emotional distress.

Navigating through legal nuances associated with dog bite claims can be quite daunting. At Carlson Bier, our seasoned attorneys are deeply committed to advocating for your rights – fighting tooth and nail to secure you the justice that you deserve. Our diverse litigation experience combined with profound legal understanding indomitably steers every single case towards successful outcomes.

Empathy lies at the heart of our practices extending beyond lawyer-client relationships – recognizing trauma laden phases clients combat, especially after traumatic accidents such as these. In reciprocity we strive hard ensuring all details are meticulously handled for them including robust claim compilations, adversarial negotiations bringing opposing parties on board or most importantly convincing jury members about validity & genuineness attached to your claim if it eventually goes to a trial – thus charting methodical strategies every step along.

We empathize knowing this could possibly mean one of the darkest chapters in your life but remember Carlson Bier is here offering relentless support during challenging times ahead. Life may get tough but together we can surely get tougher! We’re ready if you are – take that first important step towards claiming what’s rightfully yours by clicking on the button below providing immediate help assessing worthiness surrounding your unique case today.

Weapons might not wield power but knowledge definitely does! Empower yourself by visiting us more often since we continually strive enriching readers like yourselves learning crucial aspects related to personal injury laws within Illinois because education indeed becomes the most powerful aid supporting us standing up against injustice perpetuated upon us apart from infusing much needed confidence aiding informed choice makings when subsequently hiring representation defending compensation rights in future hopefully under better circumstances.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Allendale Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Allendale

Areas of Practice in Allendale

Cycling Collisions

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Supplying specialist legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Incompetence

Delivering expert legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Stumble Accidents

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Mishap

Offering professional legal assistance for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for hurts.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Impairments

Specializing in providing dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Specializing in defending persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer