...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Alsip

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bite injuries are serious incidents that demand immediate legal expertise. In such trying times, choosing the right representation is crucial for you to successfully navigate through the complexities of Illinois dog injury laws. Trust none other than Carlson Bier, a distinguished personal injury law firm with an exceptional record in handling dog bite cases across Alsip and its environs. They have demonstrated unparalleled proficiency in mitigating challenging circumstances related to dog attacks: identifying liability, assessing damages, and working tirelessly to secure fair compensation. What sets them apart is their deep understanding of integral provisions governing such issues within Illinois jurisdiction; knowledge they deploy effectively so justice isn’t just pursued but diligently served. Their adeptness goes beyond familiarity with municipal statutes like leash laws or negligence codes—it entails empathizing with clients’ plight while striving relentlessly towards optimal results. Bound by commitment and fueled by compassion—Carlson Bier offers invaluable legal assistance in these distressing times; making them undeniably your assured choice when selecting a competent attorney for dealing with Dog Bite Injury cases across Alsip area.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Alsip Illinois

Welcoming you to Carlson Bier, your trusted personal injury law firm based in Illinois. Our specialization extends across a vast spectrum of cases, one prominent type being dog bite injuries. This form of injury is more common than you may think and the legal pathway accompanying it can be quite complex to handle alone.

Any experience with dog bite injuries can often be traumatizing due to the physical pain and emotional distress it carries. Contrary to popular belief, dog bites are not limited to just puncture wounds; they may also lead to fractures, lacerations and in some occasions could result in serious infections such as rabies or tetanus. The repercussions are especially grave if the victim happens to be a minor or an elderly person with pre-existing health conditions that might exacerbate their recovery process.

When it comes to dealing with Dog Bite Injuries, there are several key aspects that Carlson Bier excels at:

– Expertly handling insurance company negotiations thus ensuring our clients have a smooth journey towards compensation.

– Adept understanding of state-specific laws on significant issues like who can file such lawsuits, what constitutes negligence in these matters etc.

– Successfully demonstrating damages suffered by victims including medical expenses incurred along with substantiating negative impacts on our client’s quality of life post-injury.

Navigating through the maze that is Illinois law while competitively countering arguments presented by counter parties is not an easy task for someone without legal background. Our team brings years of expertise rooted in careful strategic planning and tireless dedication towards every case we undertake – No matter how challenging a situation might seem initially.

Being focused extensively on personal injury law allows us unparalleled insight into these situations hence providing reliable guidance throughout your legal journey: from initial discussions up until final judgement is reached. What’s important here is – You never walk alone during this journey when you choose Carlson Bier as your designated representatives

Sometimes, even the most well-intentioned pet owners might lack sufficient control over their pets, thereby leading to unfortunate occurrences like a dog bite injury. It’s important you understand often these are not regular mishaps but could be legitimate personal injury cases where Illinois law bends towards the victim. Grappling with hospital bills, physical trauma and potential psychological stress in such times is overwhelming – Getting honest legal advise shouldn’t exacerbate your troubles.

Laws regarding dog bite injuries can seem abstruse to anyone who’s not a legal professional. We at Carlson Bier aim to make things simpler for you by providing comprehensive assistance every step of the way. This isn’t just about financial compensation, it also includes getting closure and ensuring such incidents don’t repeat in future.

We would like to highlight that Carlson Bier does not represent itself as ‘personal lawyers’ stationed in specific locations within Illinois such as Alsip. Our services extend across the breadth of Illinois maintaining adherence to state laws regarding our conduct.

In this era where information is at your fingertips, we believe one must make informed decisions especially when they concern matters which significantly impact your life – One such decision is choosing the right Personal Injury Law firm. Providing educational content via this platform continues being part of our commitment towards this intent.

Our role doesn’t stop at representing you legally; we consider ourselves partners bearing collective responsibility towards achieving justice for our clients- An association riveted on trust and compassionate understanding.

Understanding complex legal jargon or determining if your case does merit filing litigation needn’t be strenuous tasks any longer – Let us bear that load while you focus on healing from your ordeal; because serving justice & comfort should never come as mutually exclusive conditions! Curious about what your case could potentially be worth? Click on the button below, allow Carlson Bier’s expertise work miracles around those uncertainties circling your mind today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Alsip Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Alsip

Areas of Practice in Alsip

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing expert legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Negligence

Extending expert legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents receive reasonable recompense for injuries and damages.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Offering adept legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Building Incidents

Focused on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Expert in extending dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to defending patients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer