FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Altona

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For any unfortunate incidents involving Dog Bite Injuries in Altona, Carlson Bier stands as your steadfast legal companion. Specializing in personal injury cases statewide, this Illinois-based firm skillfully navigates the complex aftermath of a dreadful dog bite incident. As experienced negotiators and trial attorneys, they fiercely advocate for your rights ensuring maximum compensation under Illinois law. Understanding that each case brings its own unique challenges, Carlson Bier guarantees personalized service with an empathetic approach to help you recover – physically, emotionally and financially. The expert lawyers here are meticulous in their investigations gathering crucial evidence while working collaboratively with medical professionals and animal experts to strengthen your claim. With Carlson Bier on your side; extensive knowledge of local laws coupled with strong commitment make contesting dog bite injuries less daunting affording you time to focus on healing whilst we ardently pursue justice on your behalf. Choosing a trusted ally like Carlson Bier signifies entrusting the finest firm leading you through this journey firmly yet compassionately enabling victory against these unpredictable hardships.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Altona Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys not only understands the immense physical and emotional trauma a dog bite can cause but also the intricate legal issues associated with such an unfortunate incident. We are committed to serving Illinois residents who have found themselves victims of dog bites or other animal inflicted injuries. Let us help you navigate this daunting legal journey.

Dog bites can lead to unexpected medical expenses, suffering, pain and even lost wages due to missed work time recovery. Such instances demand justice and compensation for the victim. The states of Illinois provide protection to its citizens through stringent laws penalizing pet owners in case their pets attack another person unprovoked.

• In Illinois, a dog owner is held ‘strictly liable’ for any damages caused by his or her pet.

• The law covers not just actual bites but also injuries sustained from being knocked over by a dog.

• You could be entitled to compensation if you were lawfully present at the location where the incident occurred.

• Owners can’t escape liability by claiming they didn’t know their dog was dangerous.

The Carlson Bier legal team stays updated about each clause and provision defining liability concerning dog bite cases in Illinois; thus ensuring proficient advocacy for your rights.

When it comes down to making a successful claim after a canine attack, evidence plays an essential part. Gather as much information as possible from the scene including names, addresses of witnesses, pictures of wounds before they are medically treated. Don’t hesitate on reporting the event immediately to local health officials and animal control agencies which will develop registered documentation that may eventually serve as necessary proof later on.

Navigating these complexities becomes exponentially more manageable when backed by competent well-informed representation like Carlson Bier’s credible attorneys. We aim at easing out stress and worry encompassing your ordeal so you can focus solely on recovering from your injury while we stand guard protecting your interests throughout,

we are experts in aggressive negotiations with insurance firms aiming at optimal possible settlements saving you from a prolonged court trial. Nonetheless, we stand ready to go to court if necessary to obtain the justice that our clients deserve.

• We’ll conduct thorough investigation in timely manner.

• Our team will compile every minutest evidence supporting your case.

• Clinical consultations with medical professionals for detailed injury assessment.

• Crucial negotiations with insurance firms for securing an advantageous settlement.

Every dog bite scenario varies and so does its consequences. The degree of psychological trauma or physical disfigurement largely affects each claim’s respective compensation value. There isn’t a standard set figure that applies for all victims involved in similar incidents. It is influenced by various factors such as measure of fault imposed on Dog’s owner, sufferer’s corresponding degree of negligence, out-of-pocket expenses concerning medical treatment costs incurred, future predicted medical costs, lost wages because of inability to work alongside estimated future financial losses and much more.

Finding out how much compensation you could be entitled to after being bitten by a dog can feel daunting; luckily, we are here at Carlson Bier law firm ready and capable of equipping you with the vital legal support required throughout your path towards rightful recompense. Your battle becomes ours from the very moment you decide on entrusting us with it. If you’ve been injured due to a dog bite attack in Illinois allow our experienced personal injury attorneys evaluate your case meticulously outlining potential recovery theories while rectifying associated apprehensions & misconceptions surrounding liabilities specifically correlated with dog attacks.

To unveil more about what incredible value our top-notch professional assistance could bring forth along this challenging legal journey allowing smooth transition through complex process), click the button below! Discover today how much worth ends up attributed to your unique case with Carlson Bier helping rightfully recover deserved funds following distress caused by traumatic canine attacks.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Altona Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Altona

Areas of Practice in Altona

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying adept legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing professional legal support for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Liability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal help to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Tumble Incidents

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for harms and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Head Impairments

Expert in extending specialized legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Expert in representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440