...

Bicycle Accidents in Amboy

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re embroiled in a bicycle accident within the jurisdiction of Amboy, navigating through the legality maze can be burdensome. That’s where Carlson Bier enters the scenario – an outstanding personal injury lawyer firm from Illinois, armed with expertise specifically tailored for handling bicycle accidents. Their robust understanding of specific local laws and federal regulations offers strategic advantages when fighting your case. The compassionate team at Carlson Bier is experienced in crafting compelling arguments that resonate with jurors and judges alike, maximizing compensation potential effectively. Additionally, they are consummate professionals who go above and beyond to ensure their client’s rights are protected while maintaining ethical boundaries. With diligent attention to every detail of your case during investigation or litigation processes, they work tirelessly towards achieving optimal outcomes – making them an ideal consideration as attorneys for bicycle accidents scenarios. They possess unparalleled dedication essential to protect your interests conclusively; let Carlson Bier chart a course through this legal storm on your behalf today.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Amboy Illinois

As experts in personal injury law, Carlson Bier proudly serves the state of Illinois with an enduring commitment to victims of bicycle accidents. Safety on the road is paramount and we recognize that bicycle-related incidents can be life-altering experiences. Our competent team works tirelessly for our clients to obtain compensation they rightfully deserve.

Bicycle accidents often have serious consequences ranging from minor scrapes and bruises to severe bodily injuries or even fatalities. This could happen due to a variety of reasons including negligence by motorists, faulty roadway design, mechanical failure, and more. Victims are often left physically hurt, financially burdened by medical bills or repair costs, emotionally distressed, and sometimes unable to return to their daily lives.

The intricacies involved in handling such cases neatly highlight the importance of having a proficient attorney who understands the specifics of these claims:

• Differentiating bike accident laws specific to Illinois.

• Proving liability for your bicycle crash incident.

• Navigating through insurance company negotiations.

At Carlson Bier, we abide by intricate details within Illinois’ personal injury law:

– Assisting clients understand legal nuances: Being aware of relevant local statutes simplifies building a strong case. For instance, Illinois binds bicyclists with obligations similar to motor vehicle drivers under its ‘Vehicle Code’. Not adhering could potentially affect your claim during proceedings.

– Establishing fault: Determining liability is fundamental yet essential as it significantly impacts compensatory decisions Implicating another party successfully requires substantial evidence showcasing their negligent behavior caused your damages.

– Liaising with insurance companies: Talking terms with insurers can be daunting. As experienced professionals familiar with requisite tactics used by insurance companies, we ensure you get maximum benefit from your claim.

Bicycle safety is largely neglected within road user policy discussions. Enhanced understanding about cyclists’ rights on roads forms part of our larger mission at Carlson Bier where education synchronizes seamlessly with legal assistance ensuring holistic client support.

This compendium provides a comprehensive glimpse into one of Carlson Bier’s areas of specialization within personal injury law. We intend to build relationships not clients.

We encourage individuals who have been victims of bicycle accidents to promptly seek legal assistance. A delay can risk potential evidence disappearing, witnesses becoming unreachable, or exceeding the statute of limitations specific to Illinois state making your claim null and void. Seeking early consultation also allows more time for gathering requisite information building a strong case.

Simply pursuing a claim after being involved in an accident isn’t sufficient – choosing the right representation matters significantly too. Our proficient team at Carlson Bier assesses every aspect meticulously thereby assuring that each client receives a personalized experience meeting their individual needs with empathy, expertise and energetic effort.

Should you find this overview beneficial and wish to explore it further, we are available for consultations regarding any queries or concerns you may have about bike accident claims or related content hereof.

In conclusion, if you or someone close has been affected by a bike accident in Illinois; seeking justice shouldn’t be daunting – Carlson Bier is here with you throughout your journey offering unconditional support through tactical advice teamed with compassionate counsel ensuring optimum positive outcomes

Click on the button below and discover how much your case could potentially be worth! Let us help guide you through your rights under Illinois law while ensuring potential compensation stands maximized pertaining to the specifics of your individual case. With Carlson Bier by your side, ensure no stone is left unturned toward receiving due justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Amboy Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Amboy

Areas of Practice in Amboy

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Extending adept legal help for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing dedicated legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, delivering expert legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Committed to helping patients of car accidents get just compensation for hurts and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Extending experienced legal representation for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Damages

Focused on providing dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Damage

Focused on supporting clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer