...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Amity

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be a traumatic event with long-lasting repercussions. Understanding this, Carlson Bier Law Firm stands as your committed advocate in Amity. With profound knowledge rooted within Illinois law, our team of experienced attorneys specializes in handling dog bite injuries cases diligently and empathetically. We believe that each client deserves personalized attention, which is why we dedicate ourselves to understanding the intricate aspects of your case comprehensively. Our experience has taught us that achieving favorable outcomes relies upon listening carefully to your story and acting compassionously yet persuasively in asserting rights on our clients’ behalf.

When it comes to navigating complex legal procedures related to such incidents, Carlson Bier offers invaluable support designed around preventing you from carrying this burden alone. Our track record reflects successful resolution of numerous dog bite cases through actionable advice and steadfast commitment.

Choose Carlson Bier for any legal recourse following canine-inflicted harm – ensuring comprehensive representation grounded by expertise and propelled towards justice coupled with proper compensation for victims’ plights.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Amity Illinois

At Carlson Bier, proficient at adeptly handling personal injury cases across Illinois, we assertively advocate for the victims of dog bite injuries. We understand that these scary incidents can abruptly intrude on your life causing both physical and emotional traumas. Moreover, dog bite-related injuries often surface intricate legal matters that require a discerning eye and in-depth experience. This is why our tenacious team is committed to providing you with informative content regarding your rights and potential remedies following a dog bite incident.

A foremost point to grasp about dog bite law in Illinois is encapsulated by the fact that it is categorized as a ‘strict liability’ state. In straightforward terms, this means that the owner of the aggressive canine cannot evade liability by stating they were oblivious to their pet’s hostile propensities – they are held accountable regardless of prior knowledge or lack thereof.

• Understanding strict liability

Strict Liability indicates direct responsibility from the animal’s owner for any injury or damage inflicted upon others irrespective of negligence or intent.

In concert with this, Illinois also imposes what effectively stands as a ‘one-bite’ rule where you do not necessarily need to prove negligence if an individual becomes a victim of such an unfortunate event under circumstances revolving around an illegally unconfined household pet.

• Exploring the one-bite rule

The One-Bite Rule places legal accountability on pet owners when their dogs have bitten someone before—directly placed upon them without proof of negligence or prior awareness required for other personal injuries.

It might seem conundrum but grasping its nuances go far off into ensuring maximum restitution possible. Therefore arranging immediate medical attention after such accidents are imperative irrespective to severity involved; Documenting externally visible wounds while keeping track records pertaining medical interventions would provide crucial evidence massively augmenting chances winning lawsuits against defaulters responsible whilst claiming coverage from insurance agencies correspondingly easier than otherwise envisaged.

As daunting as this process may sound pursuing it nonetheless ensures fair compensation for incurred medical expenses, lost wages and indemnities pertaining pain or suffering endured; Encompassing unforeseen repercussions requiring future medical assistance cutting financial restraints assumed otherwise. Being victims to traumatic events shouldn’t impose additional burdens in your lives.

• Seek immediate medical attention

The single most important step following a dog bite is to seek immediate medical care, even if the injury seems minor at first.

• Document Your Injuries

Take photographs of your wounds right after the incident and during recovery. This documentation can be crucial evidence in your case.

At Carlson Bier we’re committed towards ensuring deserved justice upon victims affirming consistency throughout these trying times knowing you’ve got steadfast advocates by side. At no point our principled stance wavers attesting unwavering support absolutely necessary standing up against proceedings held within courtroom battles pervasive across such cases. Regardless where innocent individual’s affected, we’re ready extending utmost dedication going over all inches ensuring rightful claims appropriately addressed benefitting parties wrongfully afflicted through others’ thoughtless actions nipping off-life altering implications beforehand.

In dealing with a law firm like ours, rest assured that your needs are being served by lawyers who truly understand what it means to navigate this area of law with dexterity. So don’t let unfortunate circumstances overwhelm sovereignty reclaim rightfulness deserved clicking on button below discovering how much potentially worth genuinely is being victim under an unrestrained dog owner’s negligence within strict ‘One-Bite rule’ state Illinois contextually adheres maintaining accountability constantly fighting off injustices laid unforeseen incidents undeniably devastating bringing life back track indeed empowering.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Amity Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Amity

Areas of Practice in Amity

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying skilled legal assistance for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Malpractice

Offering professional legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Fall Accidents

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Mishaps: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents gain appropriate recompense for damages and damages.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Incident

Providing adept legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in extending expert legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on representing patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer