Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Amity

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is known for its exemplary service in handling Spinal Cord Injuries cases. With a lauded reputation in the personal injury field, our firm possesses extensive experience and robust knowledge on spinal cord injuries law intricacies: aiding those affected by life-altering events to secure the rightful compensations they deserve. A notable expertise that sets us apart is understanding individual case nuances which ensures not only personalized services but also maximized compensation delivery. Engaging Carlson Bier drives exponential legal backing strength, upping your chances greatly of obtaining just redress for loss suffered due to another’s negligence or wrongful action leading to your injury. Servicing Amity community with distinguished legal representation from investigations, case building through settling or litigating has made us preferred choice there. Never compromising clients’ needs forms our work core while safeguarding your rights stands paramount over all undertakings at Carlson Bier – Your reliable partner navigating complex landscape of spinal cord injuries lawsuits ensuring favourable resolution outcomes are realized timely and efficiently with minimum stress involved.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Amity Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that spinal cord injuries are a complex matter. Injuries to the spinal cord can have a profound effect on all aspects of your life—physical health, emotional well-being and financial stability. As established personal injury attorneys in Illinois, we aim to provide comprehensive educational content regarding this critical health issue.

Spinal cord injuries usually begin with a blow or trauma that fractures or dislocates your vertebrae—the segments of bone or cartilage forming the spine. The damage begins at the moment of injury when displaced bone fragments, disc material, or ligaments bruise or tear into spinal cord tissue. This instigates an array of changes that can extend over days or weeks.

The upper segment of your spine – cervical region – when injured can fundamentally affect movement and feeling in arms and body below the neck area also termed ‘quadriplegia’. Further down around chest level – thoracic regions: These injuries mainly impact legs while still retaining control and functionality over upper body (‘paraplegia’). Lower back region – lumbar and sacral spine: This affects hips and legs.

Understanding every aspect about how such an injury can disrupt one’s daily activities is essential as it forms the evidence for any legal case pertaining to personal injuries. Bulleted below are key points you may consider:

• Social Implication: Not being able to work renders little opportunity for social interaction.

• Financial Impact: Large medical bills combined with lack of work causes economic strain.

• Psychological Effects: Decreased mobility may lead to depression.

Considering these debilitating effects associated with spinal cord injuries, comprehending your rights is important if you intend to pursue a claim against those responsible for your plight.

Given our experience in managing cases related personally-acquired injuries due human fault; we have successfully advocated for clients who suffered from falls on slippery surfaces at public places like shopping malls among others which resulted in spinal conditions affecting their life quality thereafter. Additionally, we provide legal representation to victims who have suffered from injuries due to vehicle accidents where defense is usually required against large insurance companies.

Our team at Carlson Bier is well-prepped to aid you navigate through complexities of personal injury law while ensuring maximum compensation claim. We offer a free case evaluation and operate on a contingency basis, meaning we only get paid if there’s a successful outcome for your case. A financial victory would entail covering medical bills, future treatment costs and compensation for pain and suffering. Your wellbeing is our priority.

Finally, we believe that information sharing allows an opportunity for understanding; vital when considering adversities such as spinal cord injuries which can be pronounced life-changing incidents. Thus, in pursuit of making such critical decisions regarding your wellbeing and financial stability post-injury , it is wise to acquire expert counsel like ours at Carlson Bier law firm.

Below, there is placed button to help you understand what your case might amount monetarily in order to secure most rightful damage recovery against those responsible for causing harm knowingly or otherwise.

Let us fight this battle with you because no matter how arduous the journey maybe; remember you never walk alone! Click below now so that our expertise can contribute significantly towards securing success in attaining maximum settlement possible under laws established within Illinois state jurisdiction level by its lawmakers governing area-based specific tort offences involving gross bodily harm caused due others’ negligence shown during course of their duties.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Amity Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Amity

Areas of Practice in Amity

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Injuries

Providing specialist legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal services for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Accountability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Trip Incidents

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Offering legal support for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents receive fair payout for harms and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Trucking Crash

Delivering expert legal representation for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to extending expert legal services for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Focused on defending clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer