Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Andover

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries, consider the services of Carlson Bier: a respected and proficient team of attorneys based in Illinois. Their expertise in personal injury law is well recognized and their success rate serves as an assurance for victims seeking fair compensation. Dog bite incidents are often traumatic physically and emotionally, making legal representation by professionals like Carlson Bier essential to navigate through complex layers of negotiations successfully. They understand the laws governing dog bites excellently: from the rights and responsibilities of pet owners to fighting victim cases relentlessly against insurance companies’ lowball offers. With years of litigation experience, they also possess insightful knowledge on the trends within appellate court decisions affecting these types of cases which gives them competitive edge above many others,resulting in optimal client outcomes repeatedly… these are some reasons why considering retaining Carlson Bier will provide you strategic legal advice ensuring your case is on solid ground legally while you focus on recovery.Don’t let your location deter you; despite focusing attention towards Andover’s victims,CB does not confine its practice jurisdiction only there..they proudly serve throughout Illinois state.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Andover Illinois

At Carlson Bier, it is our mission to ensure justice and protection for dog bite victims in Illinois. As a team of dedicated personal injury attorneys with vast expertise in handling such cases, we offer more than just legal support. We understand that being involved in a dog-bite incident can be traumatically devastating on both physical and mental fronts. Hence, our tailored services extend beyond mere legal representation to compassionately aid you through this challenging period.

With nearly 4.7 million Americans victomized by dog bites each year, it’s not surprising that more than half the claims filed under homeowners’ insurance revolve around such injuries. The severity of these instances ranges widely from minor punctures to life-threatening attacks which may result in scarring, disfiguring wounds and substantial medical bills.

Several crucial facts about dog bite incidents:

• Not merely limited to physical trauma: Dog bite incidents initiate a traumatic cycle of recovery involving medical expenses, loss of wages due to missed workdays or even psychological counseling costs.

• A need for immediate medical attention: It’s critical post-incident care incorporates immediate wound cleansing and appropriate professional aid.

• Not all breeds are equal: Certain breeds are indeed statistically proven to cause severe harm more frequently; however, any breed can exhibit aggression under certain circumstances.

• Legislative protectiveness: In Illinois, strict liability laws insinuate that pet owners remain responsible for their canine’s actions irrespective of the circumstance leading up to them or any prior aggressive behavior displayed by the animal.

Being well-informed aids preparedness for unexpected challenges. Thus studying individual local statutes concerning dogs — leash lawsanchoring’ ordinances along with specific rules governing ”dangerous’, “vicious” dogs — equip individuals better should an unfortunate event occur.

Navigating the complex legal aftermath may seem daunting but at Carlson Bier we aim ease this process. Our unique approach involves understanding your specific needs and formulating a strong strategy rooted in diligent research and effective negotiation. Our primary target: achieving maximum compensation that thoroughly covers medical costs for treatment, rehabilitation, along with pain and suffering caused. Additionally, possible recovery for lost wages or any property damage incurred is also sought.

Dog bites incidents are unique when it comes to Illinois personal injury law due the comprehensive protections offered by state statutes held against dog owners whose animals cause harm. The Illinois Animal Control Act beholds the dog owner completely accountable if their pet harms another individual elsewhere than on the owner’s property unless provoked into doing so. Thus your ability to recover is not hindered by conventional defenses such as ‘contributory negligence’ in this case.

While striving to make your legal journey smooth, Carlson Bier pledges surety in every step taken towards gaining justice onto victims of dog bite injuries. Important stages encompass:

• Establishing a claim under the strict liability provision of Illinois law.

• Analyzing all available insurance coverage— homeowner’s insurance policy or renters insurance namely.

• Documenting all aspects of bite incidents — photo capturing injuries sustained and obtaining testimony from potential witnesses involved.

• Engaging detailed follow-ups with medical practitioners treating victimized parties ensuring most valid evidences come forth strengthening claims pursued.

We proudly stand committed to securing adequate compensation deserved while offering personalized guidance throughout our engagement.

As experienced champions of many successful personal injury cases across Illinois, we assure you – no client stands alone at Carlson Bier. Ensuring each individual understands his/her right to pursue a legal claim after enduring severe implications like permanent disfigurement or psychological trauma is part of our established commitment.

We pride ourselves in fighting relentlessly for just settlements within appropriate timelines while steering clear off unwelcoming delays. To aid understanding your rights better along with what stands achievable via legal routes, believe in connecting through transparent communication policies studded with frequent updates throughout all stages of your case evolution.

The aftermath of canine attacks disrupt lives on some level threatening financial security and overall well-being of victims. If you are one such victim seeking legal advice or representation in Illinois, contact Carlson Bier — our position in the personal injury landscape evolved through highly personalized client interactions bound by utmost confidentiality.

Legal matters may seem daunting promoting hesitation and anxiety but remember, help is just a click away. Want to understand your case value? Ready to claim justice for your suffering? Click below immediately and allow us at Carlson Bier put forth an astute evaluation of your case – pursuing rightful compensation isn’t merely about adhering to laws but crucially upholding dignity intrinsically deserving by all individuals affected adversely by feathered friends within our society.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Andover Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Andover

Areas of Practice in Andover

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Extending specialist legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Extending expert legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering specialist legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for harms and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Mishap

Extending adept legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Dedicated to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Specializing in extending compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in assisting patients with paralysis, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer