...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Anna

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we’re devoted to serving those suffering from spinal cord injuries with comprehensive personal injury legal services. Our tailored strategies and relentless determination have helped countless clients navigate the complexities of their cases in Anna, Illinois. We offer unmatched expertise in understanding the intricacies surrounding spinal cord injury claims, always aiming to secure favorable outcomes for our valued clients. At Carlson Bier, we believe that every client deserves justice and an opportunity to live fully despite their injuries. You can rely on us to pursue all possible damages aggressively: medical expenses, lost wages or earning capacity – also covering non-economic losses such as pain and emotional distress associated with your traumatic event – fighting vigorously for your legal rights while you focus on recovery. Above all else at Carlson Bier, your well-being is our top priority; hence providing compassionate representation while delivering results is critical here because it marks our commitment towards achieving justice genuinely.” With its vast experience in spinal cord injury law across various scenarios, Carlson Bier emerges as a robust choice for fighting such complicated cases”.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Anna Illinois

As your trusted advocates, Carlson Bier, a reputable Illinois-based law firm, underscores its commitment to guiding victims of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) towards the path of legal justice. Our assemblage of seasoned personal injury attorneys acquaints clients with an incredibly complex yet crucial subject: Spinal Cord Injuries – empowering you with knowledge, and ultimately unlocking the doors to potential compensation.

Spinal Cord Injuries, primarily caused by traumatic events such as falls or traffic accidents, can lead to a drastically altered quality of life. Key indicators emulating such injuries include loss of movement or sensation, excruciating pain, impaired breathing and difficulties in balance.

Understanding SCI’s diverse classifications significantly aids in grasping their implication. Completeness and location are two pivotal categories that medical professionals use to classify these injuries. A complete injury implies total lack of sensory and motor functions below the level of injury. Alternatively, incomplete injury signifies partial preservation of this functionality.

In terms of location-centric categorization:

– Cervical spinal cord injuries affect upper limbs and could potentially impact breathe.

– Thoracic spinal cord injuries predominantly influence torso and legs.

– Lumbar spinal cord injuries dictate hips & legs while sacral spinal cord damages majorly interfere with pelvic organs.

The aftermath enfolding an incident resulting in SCI typically encompasses massive medical expenditure secondary only to incalculable physical discomfort along the lines panic attacks or persistent mental distress. As monetary burdens amplify post-incidents primarily concerning hefty hospital bills for surgeries or physiotherapy sessions; appointing an accomplished personal injury attorney at Carlson Bier not just assists surviving this ordeal but also provides viable monetary relief intertwined with comprehensive emotional support during such taxing times.

Your rightful claim is frequently calculated under distinctive subjects including economic damages representing quantifiable hurt like loss wages due compensation time-off work or increased living expenses owing extended hospital stays besides non-economic damage accounting intangible hurt akin chronic pain or decreased enjoyment life post-injury.

Legal complexities enclosing SCI claims can be daunting, with convoluted legal definitions and intricate paperwork. That’s where our role as dedicated personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier emerges crucial. Our team will untangle the knotty legal threads intertwining your rightful claim while empowering you to focus primarily on recovery.

Expect nothing short of ardent representation making tireless efforts securing maximum compensation cases involving medical malpractices concerning misdiagnosis or surgical errors, negligent individual/establishment causing accidents, or product liabilities resulting defective consumer goods contributing injurious outcome.

Once we’re retained as your counsel, we delve into exhaustive investigations launching equally detailed examinations threading through medical records rounding up evidence supporting your case; contracting industry-leading experts rendering clear-cut understanding intricacies tangled in spinal cord injuries whether it’s about locating fault or assessing decisive long-term care costs seamlessly banking on our time-tested negotiation skills for bolstering case settlement in client’s favor.

If you’ve suffered a devastating spinal cord injury, trusting us as your fearless advocates could make the difference when standing against massive healthcare system or big-shot insurance companies trying downplay rightful compensation. We urge you not just navigate but also prosper this unnerving journey bestowing undeterred faith upon us – leading players proficient arms law diligently attending clients’ requirements yielding groundbreaking outcomes since inception till date throughout Illinois.

Why struggle alone amidst an ocean of uncertainties post-trauma! Find the support you need right here at Carlson Bier. Are you curious about the potential worth of your Spinal Cord Injury case? Allow us to provide clarity wrapped in confidentiality – click on the button below to discover how much value your valid claim holds!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Anna Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Anna

Areas of Practice in Anna

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Proficient in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying skilled legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring specialist legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Mishaps

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents gain equitable compensation for damages and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Offering specialist legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in ensuring expert legal advice for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Harm

Expert in supporting persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer