...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Annawan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Annawan, it’s crucial to retain proven legal representation. Carlson Bier excels at championing for victims of such incidents, known for securing substantial compensation. Our experts specialize in navigating the complexities of dog bite injury cases and relentlessly fight on behalf of injured parties to ensure the best possible judgement. Driven by compassionate care and dedicated professionalism, Carlson Bier thrives on its ability to understand each case uniquely while upholding Illinois’ rigorous legal standards. As your chosen law firm, we offer personalized strategies that maximize recovery potential from negligent pet owners or insurance companies unwilling to settle fairly. Our extensive experience with these specific personal injury cases has solidified our reputation as outstanding advocates within this arena, making us a foremost consideration for anyone grappling with dog bite injuries across Illinois – including Annawan residents who deserve nothing less than exceptional legal support during such challenging times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Annawan Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted partner in personal injury law. With deep roots and experience in Illinois, our team has extensive knowledge of laws concerning dog bite injuries. It’s a topic that many overlook until they or a loved one become victims. Understanding the technicalities surrounding this type of incident can prepare you for any unforeseen circumstances while bringing to light how we can assist.

Dog bites happen more frequently than most might think, leaving physical and psychological scars. As seen in victim testimonials and medical cases presented against negligent pet owners, dog bites inflict serious injuries which sometimes lead to long-term health complications such as nerve damage, infections or emotional trauma.

Investigating the event is critical in establishing liability and building foundational ground for both negotiations with insurance companies and subsequent potential litigation processes.

• A clear description of the event enhances comprehension of its nature – time, location, events leading up to it etc.

• Witness accounts are key materials; they provide different perspectives to substantiate the claim.

• Photographic evidence helps document physical injury severity that could fade with healing over time.

In our dedication to professionalism at Carlson Bier, we advocate effectively against parties who may be responsible for negligence causing these injuries like recklessness by the pet owner or property administrators where incidents occur on public premises.

Illinois embraces the “strict liability” rule applied when dogs bite or cause injury while not provoked. According to Illinois Dog Bite Law (510 ILCS 5/16), the injured person should prove

– The defendant owned the dog

– They conducted themselves peacefully

– At no point did they provoke the said animal

Under these tenets upheld by strict liability: irrespective if a dog previously showed vicious behavior or caused similar harm – its owner still holds responsibility for damages experienced from unprovoked attacks.

State statutes stipulate two years from an injury date for filing personal injury lawsuits – including those arising out of dog-bite accidents (735 ILCS 5/13-202). Legal prowess could mean the difference between having some compensation and realizing full entitled rights. Therefore, getting expert advice from Carlson Bier will surely be advantageous.

As personal injury lawyers well-established in Illinois, we at Carlson Bier empower victims of dog bites by assuring that each case’s unique particulars are diligently evaluated for pursuing substantial lawsuit claims or settlements. We advocate fiercely to ensure you get appropriate medical treatment costs, lost wages due to potential ability impairment to work post-injury and pain/suffering associated with such incidents.

We endeavor working passionately on your behalf, streamlining an often complex legal process while enlightening clients on evolving dynamics — reducing unnecessary stress when it matters most ensuring a seamless journey towards recuperation.

Trust us with navigating the complexities of personal injury law – especially as pertains to dog bite cases in Illinois. Know that our team is both qualified and committed giving maximum effort in representing your interests.

You’ve tirelessly navigated what seem unending scrolls of text wondering: “what’s my case worth?” Hesitation might deprive you of justice rightfully yours! Click the button below now; let’s embark on this empowering journey together today. Don’t leave any stone unturned– start exploring potentially positive outcomes highlighting value that only seasoned law firms like Carlson Bier can bring!

Through consistently delivering successful verdicts & settlements defining our stellar reputation built over years of dedication – we’ll walk with you every step till you see justice served. So why wait? Let’s get started right away!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Annawan Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Annawan

Areas of Practice in Annawan

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Giving specialist legal help for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Trip Injuries

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting sufferers of car accidents gain fair payout for wounds and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Offering specialist legal support for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for injuries.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Expert in offering expert legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Trauma

Specializing in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​