Bicycle Accidents in Antioch

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the realm of personal injury litigation, Carlson Bier stands above the rest due to its unrivalled expertise in bicycle accident cases. Anchored in Illinois with vast experience and law acumen concerning vehicular mishaps, their accomplished attorneys are primed to handle even the most complicated bike-related incidents effectively. When you encounter a bicycle incident within Antioch’s jurisdiction, opting for Carlson Bier ensures proficient legal support that gender relentless pursuit of justice on your behalf. Their formidable understanding of cyclists’ rights coupled with profound familiarity about local road dynamics sets them apart while advocating for clients involved in accidents around Antioich area. The firm stands committed towards establishing a strong case strategy by collating concrete evidence and flawless documentation which is essential following any cycling collision claim process.Their goal remains singular – secure rightful compensation for affected cyclists whilst paving way for safer roads within communities they serve.Imbued deeply with dedication and integrity; choosing Carlson Bier signifies aligning oneself with exceptional legal prowess successfully maneuvering through challenging territories embedded in bicycle accident legislation exclusively tailored according to individual case complexities.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Antioch Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted ally in personal injury law with a firm base throughout Illinois. We bring to our valued clients impeccable expertise and unwavering commitment when representing victims of bicycle accidents.

Navigating the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be overwhelming and intricate. It’s paramount for you, as the wounded party or concerned loved one, to understand some essential facts about these types of accidents:

• Bicycle accidents often result in catastrophic injuries due to the apparent lack of protection that cyclists have compared to motorists.

• These injuries can range from fractures and traumatic brain injuries to spinal cord damage—all of which may necessitate extensive medical treatment.

• The emotional trauma following such an incident should not be underestimated either—the event’s shock paired with potentially lasting physical consequences could lead to psychological distress like depression or anxiety.

Unfortunately, crucial contributing factors in many bicycle incidents are motorist negligence or road conditions unsuitable for biking. Regardless of these common causes manifesting through reckless driving or poor infrastructure maintenance, it’s clear they must be addressed—and restitution sought after where applicable—to promote safer roads while reassuring victims on their path towards recovery.

However, cases involving cycling collisions present unique challenges relating mainly to liability identification—which is why having professional representation becomes vital. Our dedicated legal team at Carlson Bier possesses comprehensive knowledge coupled with years worth experience tackling issues precisely related to responsibility disputes—enhancing your prospects during compensation claims significantly.

It’s also important that you remain mindful about statuary timelines within which you ought yours action—a matter acknowledged as ‘Statute Of Limitations.’ Generally speaking, Illinois state law demands filing your claim within 2 years following the mishap date. However, different circumstances might affect this time limit—for instance concerning minors involved during the collision—or if municipal bodies require serving notices sooner than typical deadlines permit. Therefore immediately reaching out post-incident remains imperative—to avoid forfeiting possible compensatory rights unnecessarily.

Your journey post-bicycle-accident should primarily concentrate on your recovery and peace of mind, with legalities handled by capable, compassionate professionals who genuinely care. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in—we promise unflinching advocacy and proactive communication from our first meeting onward to secure you the justice you deserve.

• We will collaborate closely with medical practitioners to understand the full scope of your injuries—being hands-on about estimating present and future financial necessities.

• We are committed to exhaustive exploration of every accident detail, focusing not just on motorist action but also possible bike equipment defects or road maintenance negligence.

• Through rigorous negotiation with insurance companies we ensure that your rights as a cyclist are recognized.

• And finally, if necessary we’re primed for battling it out within courtrooms producing well-rounded evidence-based arguments supporting your claim.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that no compensation can truly offset the emotional trauma accompanied by physical suffering following a bicycle accident. However, fighting aggressively for fair repayment can alleviate some burdens associated with unforeseen medical expenses and wage loss – letting stakeholders concentrate more constructively upon getting back their normal life track without agonising over finances constantly.

Within Illinois’ vast geography we provide robust representation—having strategic presences across several locales while never forgetting one vital ethical advertising limitation: implying existing office facilities within cities housing none. So whether needing counsel concerning personal injury laws or seeking relentless legal associates regarding bicycle mishap repercussions—you can trust Carlson Bier for delivering unwavering support whenever required throughout regions of legitimate practice.

From navigating complex liability issues to tenacious negotiations with insurance adjusters—we act as an integrative helping hand enabling equitable recoveries per case merit specifics. Our clients are at the center of everything we do at Carlson Bier—and their satisfaction along with positive outcomes remain paramount victory symbols—for us providing necessary motivation maintaining remarkable service standards sustainably.

Curious about potential compensation numbers relevant to a case like yours? Or contemplating how witnessed deviations might translate into recovery claim amounts? We invite you to study the justice journey pursued on their behalf by our past clients—thereby experiencing first-hand insights concerning likely legal processes upcoming for your organically drawn queries. And perhaps inspiring further confidence about starting this very crucial step towards healing—with an unwavering pillar of support right beside you.

So, are you ready to understand your case’s worth more closely and meet specialists who put ‘your best interest’ in their top priorities consistently? If yes, simply click on the button below, taking that empowering next action—we at Carlson Bier eagerly look forward to embarking on a shared journey fostering hope, promoting reassurance while restoring trust-partnering within your fight against unfairness effectively.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Antioch Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Antioch

Areas of Practice in Antioch

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering specialist legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring professional legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending adept legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Fall Occurrences

Adept in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents secure just compensation for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Extending adept legal support for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for harms.

Building Mishaps

Committed to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Focused on delivering specialized legal assistance for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Skilled in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to representing clients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer