Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Antioch

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one in Antioch has suffered a spinal cord injury due to someone else’s negligence, Carlson Bier law firm is here to fight for your rights. Specializing in representing victims of such catastrophic injuries, our team utilizes their vast legal knowledge and experience to ensure the best possible outcome for each case. A spinal cord injury can be life-altering – mentally, physically, and financially. With Carlson Bier by your side, we will advocate relentlessly on your behalf while navigating the complexities of personal injury litigation process fiercely yet compassionately. Our attorneys understand that every situation is unique; hence they devise strategies tailored specifically towards individual needs and circumstances resulting from these severe accidents.

In Illinois – trust none other than the exceptional lawyers at Carlson Bier for comprehensive guidance through this challenging journey.

Remember: No matter how complex your case might appear initially; with us on board advocating tirelessly in pursuit of justice – you’re never alone! Dedicated representation from qualified experts like ours proves indispensable when seeking compensation after suffering Spinal Cord Injuries.

With years of proven success handling tough negotiations with unwavering perseverance – choose wisely; Choose Carlson Bier because every detail matters!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Antioch Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are staunch advocates for victims of personal injury and seek justice on their behalf. Today’s focus is Spinal Cord Injuries, a severe type of injury that can have life-altering consequences. These injuries often result from incidents such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports mishaps, or violent encounters. Understanding the intricate details of spinal cord injuries not only aids in prompt management but also helps our clients understand the gravity of such cases.

Spinal cord injuries are classified into two major types – complete and incomplete. A complete spinal cord injury implies total loss of sensory and motor function below the level of injury. On the other hand, an incomplete spinal cord injury means there is some function left; one might move one limb more than another or have more functionality on one side of the body than the other.

These classifications bear significant weight legally due to their impact on quality-of-life adjustments required post-injury, future healthcare expenses, long-term disability implications among others—elements that play substantial roles in determining rightful compensation.

• The enervating blow dealt to trauma victims physically

• The financial turbulence with unforeseen medical bills

• The emotional turmoil faced by victims and families.

• Long-term rehabilitation process alongside career implications

For each element mentioned above lies a plethora of intangible nuances that earmark each case’s uniqueness—a crucial factor considered meticulously during legal processes at Carlson Bier.

Unanticipated factors like subsequent complications also form an integral part in these cases. Secondary conditions following a spinal cord injury can include deep vein thrombosis (DVT), urinary tract infections (UTIs), bedsores, chronic pain issues, muscle spasms—the list continues unabatedly.

Rehabilitation after experiencing a spinal cord injury nudges patients into further unfamiliar territory where they encounter an array of new specialists — neurologists , physiotherapists , psychologists , orthopedic surgeons etc., building up layers over already mounting healthcare costs.

• Costs of medical aids like wheelchairs or walkers

• Home modification expenses to accommodate special needs.

• Ongoing treatment & rehabilitation expense predictions

The legal umbrella interwoven with spinal cord injury cases opens doors to executional challenges, imperative for navigating through complex legal battles. Thus, procuring professional aid via experienced attorneys is no longer a choice but essentiality.

It’s important to remember that Illinois law dictates strict limitations on filing personal injury lawsuits, adopting the comparative negligence rule when an injured person was partly at fault for their accident—indicating a further deduction in compensation recoverable. Hence seeking early intervention from seasoned attorneys versed well with these nuances would streamline this arduous process significantly.

Carlson Bier group prides itself as being at the forefront of championing justice for victims of spinal cord injuries throughout Illinois. Our relentless pursuit towards achieving fair compensation rightly acknowledges both apparent and veiled damages suffered by our clients due to these unfortunate incidents. Guided by years of experience handling such complicated matters, we provide tailored advice finely woven together after meticulous information analysis – offering customized solution suiting the unique attributes each case presents us with.

In conclusion, knowledge though vital is seldom sufficient—an axiom holding true especially within the sphere of spinal cord injury-based litigation . The journey towards securing rightful compensation invariably requires proficient navigation guided by legal wisdom—a trait manifestly prominent amongst our dedicated team here at Carlson Bier Group.

Backed by vast experience underpinning numerous successful result stories- we assure you our undeterred dedication in uncovering every hidden detail spearheading onto victory rightfully owed to you! Are you curious about your case’s worth? Don’t remain in wonderment any longer. Click on the button below now and let Carlson Bier guide your steps upon this overwhelming pathway decorated with uncertain dilemmas lined painfully alongside colossal repercussions posed unjustly onto unsuspecting victims by spinal cord injuries—a path leading undoubtedly onto justice with Carlson Bier aiding your stride!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Antioch Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Antioch

Areas of Practice in Antioch

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing skilled legal support for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying adept legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Slip Mishaps

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on aiding sufferers of car accidents secure just compensation for harms and damages.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Trucking Crash

Providing expert legal services for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for damages.

Building Incidents

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Focused on providing expert legal representation for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Focused on defending patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer