...

Bicycle Accidents in Arcola

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a bicycle accident in Arcola, it’s pivotal to seek legal representation from attorneys with proven expertise and determined advocacy. The Carlson Bier law firm excels at handling these complex cases, proficiently guiding victims through each stage of their claim. Our extensive experience reveals that bicycle accidents often stem from negligent drivers or infrastructural failings, both areas within our proficiency ambit. At Carlson Bier, we understand your rights as a cyclist and commit ourselves to secure fair compensation for damage endured.

Strategically deciphering evidence followed by aggressive negotiations forms the core strength of our reputable legal practice. With an intimate knowledge about Illinois laws pertaining to cycling mishaps, our approach aims for resilience and resourcefulness in representing you diligently against formidable opponents such as insurance companies who overlook cyclists’ welfare frequently.

Feel assured knowing that with Carlson Bier advocating on your behalf; you are collaborating with attorneys marked by unwavering perseverance towards achieving optimal results in the case resolution process related specifically to Bicycle Accidents. Trust us when we say – Your relief is our triumph!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Arcola Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pledge to provide expert legal assistance for individuals who have become the unintended victims of bicycle accidents in Illinois. Our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys aims at helping you navigate through the intricate landscapes of your case so that you can claim what’s rightly yours.

In scenarios where bicyclists are involved in tragic accidents – often due to negligent drivers, poorly maintained roads or faulty cycling equipment – it becomes crucial to understand one’s rights and options. Insurance coverage may not always suffice or be awarded timely, introducing further complexity into an already distressing situation.

• Dedicated Representation: We prioritize our client’s trauma and recovery above all else as we zealously engage on their behalf against insurance companies that sometimes tend to trivialize a victim’s predicament.

• Negotiated Settlements: Bicycle accident cases can often extend over an extended period when fair compensation is disputed or negligence contested. Our skilled attorneys work diligently towards negotiating settlements outside courtrooms if possible.

• Tireless Litigation: If out-of-court negotiations fail, our lawyers are prepared fully to litigate till justice prevails. They guide you confidently through each stage ensuring your best interests remain protected during the legal proceedings.

• Empathetic Support: We comprehend the emotional toll such an unfavorable incident could take on both you and your loved ones. At Carlson Bier, we will always respond empathetically while continually striving for justice on your behalf.

Undeniably, anyone suffering from injuries due to a bicycling accident deserves uplifting care and rightful compensation. The physical pain induced by such an accident introduces an additional layer of financial strain resulting from accumulating medical bills involving treatment costs, surgeries or rehabilitation expenses.

Additionally, studies show that close encounter with deaths or severe injuries inflicted on someone close might lead to unforeseen psychological strains such as depression, stress disorders etc., taking a significant toll on well-being and productivity levels. Every aspect adds up gradually eroding peace of mind once enjoyed.

Moreover, handling insurance companies tends to become arduous for victims and their families. Delays or outright denials by insurers intensify the distress manifold while you still grapple with recovery. At such critical times, having a professional legal team by your side that firmly knows how to tackle these pressures makes all the difference.

At Carlson Bier, we believe in standing strong with our clients against adversity. Our vigorous approach combined with vast experience gives us an edge while dealing with various issues related to bicycle accidents. Remember, Illinois law protects bicyclists’ rights allowing them fair compensation for both physical injuries and psychological hindrance they might suffer due to negligent actions of others.

Let us help you pave a smoother path towards rightful recovery and restorative justice! Join hands with Carlson Bier – renowned personal injury attorney-law group operating from Illinois only – not located in Arcola. Acquire added reassurance as we bring fresh perspectives into your case ensuring optimal results are achieved relieving undue hassles off your shoulder completely.

We invite you to take advantage of our free consultation suitable conveniently around your schedule giving us an opportunity to earn your trust rightly deserved. Click on the button below generously provided by our trusted associates at Carlson Bier; let’s ascertain together what just compensation worth is entitled rightfully about your specific case! Together we stand fostering justice & promoting harmony across communities- come join us today transforming despair into optimism one case at a time!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Arcola Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Arcola

Areas of Practice in Arcola

Cycling Accidents

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending specialist legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Abuse

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Slip Injuries

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents secure equitable remuneration for wounds and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Crash

Ensuring specialist legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Focused on extending compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to representing clients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer