...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Arcola

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Specializing in personal injury law, Carlson Bier provides unparalleled legal representation for victims of medical malpractice. Knowledge and experience rooted deeply in Illinois’ legislative framework empowers us to fight inefficiencies prevalent within the healthcare system. Serving Arcola, we are committed to ensuring your rights are protected when you’ve experienced negligent care from a trusted health professional. Unwavering dedication sets us apart as valued advocates for our clients; tirelessly negotiating settlements reflecting rightful compensation they truly deserve whilst navigating complexities surrounding medical negligence cases with utmost skill and understanding. Thanks to our indefatigable pursuit of justice, countless individuals avowedly regard Carlson Bier as their preferred source of relief during challenging times faced due to inadequate healthcare standards leading credence through struggles towards restoring normalcy back into their lives again. So choose Carlson Bier – not just an eminent name but a steadfast ally against Medical Malpractice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Arcola Illinois

Carlson Bier is a premier personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, offering expertise and dependable representation for medical malpractice victims. We pride ourselves on our commitment to championing the rights of those who have been injured due to the negligence or mistakes of healthcare professionals.

Understanding medical malpractice is crucial when you are considering legal action. Essentially, this term refers to instances where a healthcare professional delivers substandard care that directly results in harm or injury to the patient. This can include misdiagnosis, prescription errors, surgical mistakes, failure to properly monitor patients or communicate effectively about treatment options.

Several key elements play a significant role in determining a valid case of medical malpractice:

– Duty: Every doctor-patient relationship implies a duty which obliges the healthcare provider to provide an acceptable standard of care.

– Breach: A breach occurs if this duty isn’t upheld – if your doctor has acted negligently by failing to adhere to accepted practices.

– Damages: To be eligible for compensation, there must be measurable damage–physical pain, emotional anguish, loss of wage earning ability/disability etc.

– Causation: The breach must be directly responsible for these damages; not all negative health outcomes stem from medical malpractice.

It’s important not just for potential claimants but indeed everyone dealing with the healthcare system understands how consent factors into cases of alleged medical misconduct as well. Informed consent ensures autonomy – that patients themselves take decisions about their body and treatment plans independently after being provided complete information by their doctors about benefits and risks associated with procedures they’ve been recommended. Deviations from this without valid reason might ground legal claims on lacking informed consent against practitioners/agencies involved.

Proving these elements often requires expert testimony and considerable resources resources; turning complex facts into cogent arguments ensuring your rights aren’t compromised even slightly is what Carlson Bier does day-in-day-out under these circumstances .

Medical malpractice laws vary both in terms of statute limitations and maximum compensation amounts allowed under different heads across states. Illinois law, for instance, allows 2 years from discovering the injury to file a lawsuit while damages are uncapped (allowing full rights to patients seeking fair compensation).

It’s critical ever aware of prevalent procedural nuances since claims might be dismissed if not filed both correctly or in timely manner.

These claims can involve considerable sums – money that could help cover medical bills, replace lost income, compensate for pain and suffering, etc.; hence thorough examination of each case’s merits is essential. A crucial step often demanding scrutiny beyond the ability/understanding/discernment of most individuals needing legal assistance .

At Carlson Bier, we understand how complex and daunting filing medical malpractice suits seem. Our primary objective stays ensuring our clients’ needs remain paramount through out their legal journey so they focus on recovery instead worrying about repercussions of injuries caused due other’s negligent actions

With a team seasoned investigators paralegals medical experts backing us , we can offer big-firm resources combined with a small-firm feel . We firmly staunchly believe trust compassion integrity make up bedrock any attorney-client relationship , making sincere efforts towards creating an atmosphere openness understanding our office .

Finally reaching out get touch us first step towards asserting your rights ensuring these unfortunate circumstances don’t unduly burden you further . Please click the button below discover just much case really worth AFTER consulting simply no obligation whatsoever experts at Carlson Bier

Remember pursuit justice doesn’t need challenging journey you alone ; instead one where experienced friendly voices guide path office personal attention closer typically expect enjoy larger law firms .

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Arcola Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Arcola

Areas of Practice in Arcola

Bicycle Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing professional legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Extending professional legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering expert legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Slip Occurrences

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Delivering legal aid for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents receive fair recompense for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Mishap

Ensuring expert legal representation for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cerebral Harms

Committed to offering dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Neural Trauma

Focused on assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​