Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Argenta

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to tackling the complex legal aspects related to Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Carlson Bier is your best ally in Argenta. Equipped with an impressive track record, our litigators possess extensive expertise in the manifold of SCI-associated cases. Their proficiency and deep understanding contribute significantly towards devising robust representations tailored for every unique scenario, optimizing results according to Argenta’s jurisdictional context.

We prioritize fact-finding through advanced investigative techniques that enable a broader comprehension of incurred losses, providing leverage essential for impactful negotiations or aggressive courtroom presentations if needed. On the human side, we empathize deeply with all challenges that SCI survivors and their families undergo; henceforth, our counsel extends beyond law imparting guidance on adjustment mechanisms post trauma too.

At Carlson Bier, resilience pairs up aptly alongside solid professional acumen honed over years working on intricate spinal cord injury lawsuits stretches far across Illinois territory giving you quality representation close home without confining within city-limits alone. Opt for effectual legal assistance geared specifically towards advocating your rights by placing your trust in us.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Argenta Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, specializing in cases involving spinal cord injuries. We emphasize providing comprehensive educational resources to our clientele and potential clients who seek valuable information about the complex nature of spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries are among the most devastating afflictions that an individual can experience. These traumatic events often occur suddenly and without warning, forever changing the lives of victims and their loved ones. Spinal Cord Injuries can be catastrophic due to their profound impact on mobility and vital functions including respiration, bladder control, bowel control among others.

Understanding the detailed medical facts about spinal cord injuries can significantly enhance your capability for strategic legal action. Broadly categorized, there are two types of such damages―complete and incomplete. A complete injury results in total loss of sensory and motor function below the level of injury while an incomplete one is defined by a partial retention of neurological function.

There exist multiple causes for these severe forms of personal bodily harm:

– Motor vehicle accidents: The leading cause which accounts for almost half.

– Falls: Predominantly affecting individuals aged 65 years or older.

– Sports-related mishaps: Especially impactful on young teens/adults participating in high-intensity games

– Violence: Including gunshot wounds and knife assaults contributing to nearly 15% cases

– Medical/Surgical incidents: Representing approximately 4% incidence rate

It’s important to comprehend that each case remains unique concerning severity levels, long-term consequences & recovery potential—an ongoing process which requires time & specialized therapy treatments.

The value here at Carlson Bier lies not only in understanding our clients’ specific circumstances but also explaining them with clarity how Illinois law applies to their condition effectively aiming for fair compensation they rightfully deserve.

Moreover, the financial implications related with rehabilitation after a severe spinal cord injury should not be underestimated. The lifetime costs associated vary greatly depending on age at injury & damage severity level – which further underlines the importance of an experienced personal injury attorney by your side, seeking maximal possible compensation.

Pertaining to Illinois, some pivotal legal considerations include:

– The Statute of Limitations: Setting a time limit for initiating a lawsuit from the date of injury

– The Damage Caps Law: Some limitations may apply concerning non-economic damages such as emotional distress or loss of consortium.

– Contributory Negligence: In case the victim shares any fault in accident occurrence, it could act as a determinant on overall claimable amount.

Navigating these complexities is where our strengths lie. We at Carlson Bier diligently seek justice for victims affected by spinal cord injuries. Delivering personalized legal representation & guiding clients through each step of their cases has been our practice norm since inception.

We value transparency immensely and provide honest assessments about the potential outcome of your case while intently working towards providing you with relief during challenging moments in life—which makes denying skilled legal assistance appear less beneficial if not detrimental when considering gaining rightful reparations for costs associated like—for medical care services, wage loss due to inability to work, physical & emotional therapy sessions among others.

The severity of spinal cord damage cannot be underestimated nor should its corresponding impact on your life. Recognizing this reality fuels our unwavering commitment to aggressively represent our client’s rights within the purview of Illinois law.

Life post-spinal cord injury intensifies complexity surrounding aspects previously taken granted for—financial stability, healthy relationships & peace-of-mind—but remember—you don’t have to confront these challenges alone! With professional guidance from Carlson Bier’s committed team assisting you every step ahead…everything becomes simplified!

Curious about estimating the worthiness of your case? Tap into this opportunity today and grant yourself true clarity about available options lying in waiting – positioned right at your fingertips! Move ahead confidently and click on the button below that aligns with saving precious time—an expert call away from eliminating any lingering uncertainties regarding safeguarding the future you care for deeply!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Argenta Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Argenta

Areas of Practice in Argenta

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying professional legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Obligation

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Fall Incidents

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents obtain just settlement for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Offering experienced legal services for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Crashes

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Committed to delivering expert legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in defending individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer