...

Bicycle Accidents in Aroma Park

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a bicycle accident in Aroma Park can be distressing and disorientating. Navigating the legal aftermath need not be. The experienced team at Carlson Bier is prepared to guide you through this arduous process with expert counsel. Known for their detailed understanding of Illinois cycling laws, their proficiency in tackling complex compensation claims ensures all aspects of your case are meticulously examined for optimal outcomes. With numerous successful personal injury cases under our belt, clients can trust Carlson Bier’s meticulous approach to gathering evidence, proving liability and fighting relentlessly on behalf of cyclists’ rights & safety. Our reputation as an authoritative advocate after a bicycle accident makes us the smart choice amongst residents pursuing justice post-accident who want comprehensive legal assistance without any compromise on dedication or quality service. Be assured that with Carlson Bier by your side you will receive steadfast support throughout every step of your journey back to empowerment after such life-altering incidents.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Aroma Park Illinois

In the bustling state of Illinois, bicycle accidents are unfortunately a common occurrence. At Carlson Bier, we dedicate ourselves to representing those who have suffered such misfortunes. As leading personal injury attorneys, we strive not only to secure justice for our clients but also to educate and empower them with essential knowledge about their circumstances.

Bicycle accidents can arise from various situations—ranging from negligent motorists, hazardous road conditions to equipment failure. Negligent motorists remain a major cause of bicycle collisions in Illinois. On many occasions, drivers overlook cyclists’ rights on the road or fail to observe safety protocols which can result in severe injuries for the cyclist involved.

Similarly, dangerous road conditions pose another risk factor for these unfortunate incidents. Potholes, poor signage or lack of designated bike lanes often contribute to numerous cycling accidents yearly within Illinois jurisdiction. Importantly too is that defective gears and improperly maintained bicycles could lead to serious crashes causing substantial harm even without involving any other party.

The fallout after a bicycle accident can be both physically and emotionally distressing. Medical bills can pile up swiftly accompanied by loss of earning potentials due to your inability to work during recovery periods. This situation hence emphasizes why it’s crucially important to understand your rights as an accident victim under Illinois law.

Notably:

– You have every right under the law of negligence if injured through no fault of your own.

– Legally speaking, all bicyclists should receive just as much consideration on the road as motorized vehicles.

– If a cyclist adheres strictly with traffic rules and yet becomes injured due non-compliant motorist(s), then they are rightfully entitled compensation(s).

– Damage claims could cover medical costs, lost wages along with pain and suffering induced by the experience endured.

In essence, you don’t bear sole responsibility for mitigating potential risks while biking out there—the entities (drivers/officials responsible for keep roads safe) share equal accountability too!

With the complexities involved in such claims, our professional team at Carlson Bier stand ready to oversee your case from start-to-finish. Our expertise lies in gathering evidence comprehensively, scrutinizing all conditions contributing to the mishap and strategically building a robust lawsuit that maximizes your compensation.

Remember also, Illinois emphasizes a statute of limitations—which marks two years following an accident—or within five years for property damage or financial loss resulting thereof—constituting legal deadlines within which you must file lawsuits related to bicycle accidents. After this duration, chances at receiving any compensation may vanish completely so don’t delay! Act fast!

From assessment stages through trial (if necessary), we ensure transparent communication taking you confidently through each step thoroughly on way towards diligently achieving that justice deserved.

At Carlson Bier – Personal Injury Attorney group—we don’t just preach it—we practice it! Through tireless dedication plus vast experience dealing with bicycle accidents, rest assured that your cause is set on winning ways always.

Navigating post-accident aftermaths can truly be murky waters—but not when equipped with the right knowledge and fitting legal support. Let Carlson Bier guide seamlessly clear down those foggy paths propelling cases ultimately towards victory shores of rightful compensations justified under Illinois State laws.

Feeling curious about what exactly is worth? Just click on the button below—it’s simple—and find out today precisely how much value we could retrieve for your case! You aren’t alone—Carlson Bier stands firmly together protecting cyclists’ rights throughout these challenging times and beyond.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Aroma Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Aroma Park

Areas of Practice in Aroma Park

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying expert legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending expert legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Slip Mishaps

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to helping victims of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for injuries and damages.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring experienced legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Undeserved Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Damage

Expert in defending individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer