...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Aroma Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one have been victim of a dog bite injury in Aroma Park, you need the experienced representation that Carlson Bier can provide. Renowned and respected throughout Illinois for their legal expertise in personal injury cases, specifically involving dog bites, our team works diligently to ensure rightful compensation is secured for harm sustained due to negligent pet owners’ actions. Despite no immediate physical presence within Aroma Park itself, this has never compromised our commitment nor service quality provided to clients from this area. In fact, it’s quite the opposite; we continue demonstrating unwavering dedication and thorough understanding of local law as well as its direct impact on your specific situation. We stand confident with an impressive track record which speaks volumes about experience and success ratio attained by us in this niche field across various Illinois regions including Aroma Park area too. So don’t continue suffering without fairness! Let Carlson Bier help turn your traumatic incident into a just outcome today.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Aroma Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on providing high-quality legal services for those who have suffered personal injuries – including dog bite incidents. Our team, based in Illinois, is made up of experienced attorneys committed to advocating tirelessly for your rights and securing the compensation you deserve.

Dog bites constitute a substantial portion of personal injury cases across the nation. Illnesses or issues resulting from such incidents can be distressing, with potential outcomes ranging from physical harm to mental trauma. Distinctive features associated with dog-related accidents include:

– High Risk: A large number of people are at risk of dog bite injuries due to factors such as increased pet ownership and interaction between dogs and people.

– Severity: The damage inflicted by a dog bite can range from mild discomfort to serious physical pain or disfigurement.

– Disease Transmission: In rare instances, there are situations where diseases like rabies could potentially be transmitted via a dog bite.

Our group acknowledges that every case has unique circumstances and varies greatly in terms of complexity. For this reason, our dedicated attorneys thoroughly investigate each case individually to form an accurate understanding and lay out all possible options before proceeding further.

Illinois observes a strict liability law when it comes to dog bites which means that even if the owner was unaware of their animal’s aggression or previous record didn’t indicate any harmful behavior, they would still be liable for damages caused by their pet biting someone else. This fact highlights the immediate need for sound legal advice in such scenarios.

Trust Carlson Bier for expert consultation grounded on experience within this specialized area of law. Our dedication shines through not merely in our passion but also our commitment toward diligently working upon your case until its resolution.

Whilst managing through complex layers surrounding these cases may seem daunting initially — trust us when we say we’ve got your back! Should you decide to choose us as your preferred legal partner following a dog-bite incident; here’s what you can always expect:

– A dedicated attorney working on your case from start to finish.

– Passionate representation fighting for your rights and advocating for the compensation you deserve.

– Clear communication ensuring you are informed about all aspects of your case

Remember, time is the essence when dealing with personal injury cases. In Illinois, victims generally have two years from the date of the injury to file a lawsuit against responsible parties. Given this limited window, it’s imperative to act promptly following an incident.

So, if you or someone who care about has been bitten by a dog and suffered injuries as a result — use Carlson Bier as your reliable source of legal support. Navigate through these tricky waters buoyed up by our rich past experience of successfully representing our clients in similar matters.

Take that first step towards securing your future now! We call upon every visitor reading this to know that they can leverage our deep knowledge base complimented by an empathetic approach toward handling their private trauma. Whether it’s about learning how we’ve advocated for previous clients or exploring what could potentially be recovered and compensated within lawsuits— there’s tremendous value waiting just below! For further curiosity around understanding the worthiness of their unique case – simply click on the button below! Together let’s pave way for justice starting today! Your journey towards recovery starts here at Carlson Bier – where law meets compassion.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Aroma Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Aroma Park

Areas of Practice in Aroma Park

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Injuries

Supplying adept legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Delivering professional legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal services to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Skilled in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents receive just settlement for damages and damages.

Motorbike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Crash

Offering professional legal representation for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in ensuring expert legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​